Distribution of Pupil Offset and Angle Kappa in a Refractive Surgery Preoperative Population of 750 Myopic, Emmetropic, and Hyperopic Eyes.

PURPOSE: To report the distribution of pupil offset and angle kappa in 750 myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic eyes presenting for refractive surgery. METHODS: A retrospective study included 750 consecutive eyes screened for corneal refractive surgery between January 2006 and February 2013. The eyes were divided into three equal groups based on manifest refraction spherical equivalent (SEQ): emmetropic group between -0.25 and +0.50 diopters (D) and cylinder up to 1.00 D, myopic group greater than -0.50 D, and hyperopic group greater than +0.50 D. Angle kappa was measured with the Orbscan II software (Bausch & Lomb, Inc) and pupil offset defined as the distance at the corneal plane between the corneal vertex and the pupil center. Correlations with SEQ, cylinder, scotopic pupil diameter, average keratometry, and age were performed. RESULTS: All results are reported for myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic groups, respectively. Mean SEQ was -4.84 ± 2.89 D (range: -0.88 to -14.00 D), +0.21 ± 0.23 D (range: -0.25 to +0.50 D), and +2.44 ± 1.58 D (range: +0.63 to +7.75 D). Mean pupil offset magnitude was 0.27 ± 0.14 mm (range: 0.00 to 0.68 mm), 0.34 ± 0.14 mm (range: 0.02 to 0.78 mm), and 0.39 ± 0.13 mm (range: 0.07 to 0.75 mm). Mean pupil offset X-component was -0.18 ± 0.18, -0.28 ± 0.16, and -0.34 ± 0.15 mm (temporally displaced from the corneal vertex). Mean pupil offset Y-component was 0.06 ± 0.15, 0.03 ± 0.16, and 0.01 ± 0.16 mm (superiorly displaced from the corneal vertex). Multivariate linear regression for pupil offset magnitude found statistically significant variables were SEQ, cylinder, scotopic pupil diameter, and average keratometry. For pupil offset X-component, significant variables were SEQ, cylinder, and scotopic pupil diameter. For pupil offset Y-component, significant variables were SEQ and scotopic pupil diameter. Mean angle kappa was 5.28 ± 1.49°, 6.14 ± 1.44°, and 5.77 ± 1.29°. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to common belief, a pupil offset is present in the vast majority of eyes regardless of refractive error, with the mean temporal offset of at least 0.18 mm. Confirming previous studies, the largest pupil offset was found in the hyperopic group. However, there was also a wide range of pupil offset in myopic and emmetropic eyes. Correlations with SEQ and keratometry support the theory that pupil offset is also correlated with axial length. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(1):49-58.].

Incidence and Outcomes of Optical Zone Enlargement and Recentration After Previous Myopic LASIK by Topography-Guided Custom Ablation.

PURPOSE: To report the incidence, visual and refractive outcomes, optical zone enlargement, and recentration using topography-guided CRS-Master TOSCA II software with the MEL 80 excimer laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) after primary myopic laser refractive surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 73 eyes (40 patients) with complaints of night vision disturbances due to either a decentration or small optical zone following a primary myopic laser refractive surgery procedure using the MEL 80 laser. Multiple ATLAS topography scans were imported into the CRS-Master software for topography-guided ablation planning. The topography-guided re-treatment procedure was performed as either a LASIK flap lift, a new LASIK flap, a side cut only, or photorefractive keratectomy. Axial curvature maps were analyzed using a fixed grid and set of concentric circles superimposed to measure the topographic optical zone diameter and centration. Follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: The incidence of use in the population of myopic treatments during the study period was 0.79% (73 of 9,249). The optical zone diameter was increased by 11% from a mean of 5.65 to 6.32 mm, with a maximum change of 2 mm in one case. Topographic decentration was reduced by 64% from a mean of 0.58 to 0.21 mm. There was a 44% reduction in spherical aberration, 53% reduction in coma, and 39% reduction in total higher order aberrations. A subjective improvement in night vision symptoms was reported by 93%. Regarding efficacy, 82% of eyes reached 20/20 and 100% reached 20/32 (preoperative CDVA was 20/20 or better in 90%). Regarding safety, no eyes lost two lines of CDVA and 27% gained one line. Regarding predictability, 71% of re-treatments were within ±0.50 diopters. CONCLUSIONS: Topography-guided ablation was effective in enlarging the optical zone, recentering the optical zone, and reducing higher order aberrations. Topography-guided custom ablation appears to be an effective method for re-treatment procedures of symptomatic patients after myopic LASIK. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(2):121-130.].

LASIK for the Correction of High Hyperopic Astigmatism With Epithelial Thickness Monitoring.

PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of high hyperopic LASIK using the MEL 80 excimer laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 830 consecutive high hyperopic LASIK procedures using the MEL 80 excimer laser and either the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) or zero compression Hansatome microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY). Inclusion criteria were attempted hyperopic correction of +4.00 diopters [D] or higher in one axis and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/20 or better. Patients were observed for a minimum of 1 year. Epithelial thickness monitoring by Artemis very high-frequency (VHF) digital ultrasound (ArcScan Inc., Morrison, CO) was used to evaluate potential for further steepening as a re-treatment. RESULTS: One-year data were available for 785 eyes. Mean attempted spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) was +4.52 ± 0.84 D (range: +2.00 to +6.96 D) for the primary treatment and mean cylinder was 1.05 ± 0.86 D (range: 0.00 to 5.25 D). Mean age was 50 ± 12 years (range: 18 to 70 years) and 61% were women. Postoperative SEQ was ±0.50 D in 50% and ±1.00 D in 77% of eyes after primary treatment. After re-treatment, 67% of eyes were within ±0.50 D and 89% were within ±1.00 D. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 76% of eyes after final treatment. One line of CDVA was lost in 25% of eyes and two lines were lost in 0.4%. There was a clinically insignificant but statistically significant decrease (P < .05) in contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000) by less than 1 log unit at 3 and 6 cycles per degree (cpd) and by 1 log unit at 12 and 18 cpd. Diurnal fluctuation in refraction was identified in 2 eyes, proven by VHF digital ultrasound to be due to diurnal epithelial remodeling overnight and unrelated to maximum postoperative keratometry induced. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK for hyperopia by cumulative treatment of up to +8.33 D with the MEL 80 excimer laser was found to satisfy accepted criteria for safety, efficacy, and stability when applying specialized protocols, including epithelial monitoring. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(5):314-321.].