Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Anticancer Res ; 42(3): 1189-1198, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35220208

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: To review the current literature on pineal region gliomas, summarizing the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were used to identify relevant articles. Comprehensive clinical characteristic review and survival analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Twelve studies describing 81 patients were included. The median age was 39 years (male=54.3%). Fifty patients (61.7%) had obstructive hydrocephalus requiring cerebrospinal fluid diversion with either ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) (40.0%) or endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) (24.0%). Patients who underwent VPS had significant survival benefits compared to ETV (p<0.05). All patients in our review underwent surgery, and gross-total resection (≥98%) was achieved in 34.6%. The supracerebellar infratentorial approach was the most employed surgical approach (62.3%). Chemotherapy was administered in 32.1% of cases, and radiotherapy in 40.7%. The median overall survival (OS) was 12 months, and the overall one-year survival rate was 60%. CONCLUSION: This study could not establish a correlation between the extent of tumor resection and positive treatment outcomes. However, among cases with hydrocephalus, patients who underwent VPS placement had better survival as compared to ETV.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Glioma/surgery , Pineal Gland/surgery , Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt , Ventriculostomy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Glioma/mortality , Glioma/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Pineal Gland/pathology , Progression-Free Survival , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt/adverse effects , Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt/mortality , Ventriculostomy/adverse effects , Ventriculostomy/mortality , Young Adult
2.
World Neurosurg ; 154: e82-e101, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34224880

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Blood blister aneurysms are small, thin-walled, rapidly growing side-wall aneurysms that have proved particularly difficult to treat, and evidence-based guidance for treatment strategies is lacking. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to aggregate the available data and compare the 3 primary treatment modalities. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search according to PRISMA guidelines followed by an indirect meta-analysis that compares the safety and efficacy of surgical, flow-diverting stents (FDS), and other endovascular approaches for the treatment of ruptured blood blister aneurysms. RESULTS: A total of 102 studies were included for quantitative synthesis, with sample sizes of 687 treated surgically, 704 treated endovascularly without FDS, and 125 treated via flow diversion. Comparatively, FDS achieved significantly reduced rates of perioperative retreatment compared with both surgical (P = 0.025) and non-FDS endovascular (P < 0.001). The FDS subgroup also achieved a significantly lower incidence of perioperative rebleed (P < 0.001), perioperative hydrocephalus (P = 0.012), postoperative infarction (P = 0.002), postoperative hydrocephalus (P < 0.001), and postoperative vasospasm (P = 0.002) compared with those patients in the open surgical subgroup. Although no significant differences were found among groups on the basis of functional outcomes, angiographic outcomes detailed by rates of radiographic complete occlusion were highest for surgical (90.7%, 262/289) and FDS (89.1%, 98/110) subgroups versus the non-FDS endovascular subgroup (82.7%, 268/324). CONCLUSIONS: Flow diversion seems to be an effective treatment strategy for ruptured blood blister aneurysms, with lower rates of perioperative complications compared with surgical and other endovascular techniques, but studies investigating long-term outcomes after flow diversion warrant further study.


Subject(s)
Endovascular Procedures/methods , Intracranial Aneurysm/surgery , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Aneurysm, Ruptured/surgery , Humans , Recurrence , Stents , Treatment Outcome
3.
World Neurosurg ; 148: 15-23, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33422713

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Microwave ablation (MWA) is a novel technique that offers several potential advantages over existing ablation systems, which include production of larger ablation zones, shorter procedural times, and more effective heating through high impedance tissues such as bone. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using inclusion criteria defined as follows: 1) metastatic spinal tumors treated with open or percutaneous MWA alone or in combination with other treatments, 2) available data on pain palliation and/or local tumor control, and 3) retrospective or prospective studies with at least 1 patient. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients harboring 196 spinal lesions underwent MWA in the 8 included studies. Most studies employed the use of additional interventions, which included minimally invasive open surgery with pedicle screw fixation, traditional open surgical intervention, and cement augmentation. Despite the variability in time intervals for pain assessment, postoperative pain scores decreased considerably in both percutaneous and open MWA studies. No evidence of tumor progression was additionally seen in >80% of patients at the last follow-up across 5 studies. Complications were reported in 6.5% of all patients who underwent percutaneous MWA and in 12.2% of patients who underwent open MWA. CONCLUSIONS: This review showed that MWA can be effective in achieving analgesia for up to 6 months in select cases, although most procedures were performed in combination with augmentation and/or open surgery. Local tumor control was additionally successful in most patients, suggestive of a potential curative role for MWA.


Subject(s)
Microwaves/therapeutic use , Radiofrequency Therapy/methods , Spinal Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Pain Measurement , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Treatment Outcome
4.
Cureus ; 12(7): e9391, 2020 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32850257

ABSTRACT

Spinal facet joint cysts (FJCs) are an increasingly reported cause of lower back pain, radiculopathy, and neurological deficits owing to their proximity to adjacent nerve roots. The etiology of these cysts has not yet been fully elucidated, although they appear to be related to degenerative changes in the facet joints themselves. Conservative management strategies including physical therapy and oral analgesics rarely result in spontaneous regression of an FJC, often providing only short-term relief. The current treatment modalities reported for FJCs generally range from percutaneous cyst aspiration to decompression surgery with or without instrumented spinal fusion. However, instrumented fusion often results in a higher rate of complications such as pseudoarthrosis and adjacent segment disease. The Coflex® (Paradigm Spine, LLC, New York, NY) interlaminar stabilization (ILS) implant is a novel titanium, U-shaped device which acts as a motion-preserving stabilizer and has proven to be a viable alternative to instrumental fusion. Here, we discuss a case of an FJC treated with both decompression and placement of a Coflex ILS device.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...