Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neuroimaging ; 31(4): 706-713, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33979019

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Evaluation and treatment of acute ischemic syndromes, in the heart and brain, require vessel visualization by iodinated X-ray contrast agents. However, these contrast agents can induce injury, in both the kidneys and target organs themselves. Sulfobutylether beta cyclodextrin (SBECD) added to iohexol (SBECD-iohexol) (Captisol Enabled-iohexol, Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA) is currently in clinical trials in cardiovascular procedures, to determine its relative renal safety in high-risk patients. Preclinical studies showed that SBECD-iohexol reduced contrast-induced acute kidney injury in rodent models by blocking apoptosis. The current study was undertaken to determine whether SBECD-iohexol is also cardioprotective, in the male rat ischemia-reperfusion model, compared to iohexol alone. METHODS: After anesthesia, the left coronary artery was ligated for 30 min and the ligation released and reperfusion followed for 2 h prior to sacrifice. Groups 1-4 were injected in the tail vein 10 min prior to ischemia with: (1) vehicle; (2) iohexol; (3) SBECD; and (4) SBECD-iohexol. Infarct size, hemodynamics, and serum markers were measured. RESULTS: An eight-fold increase in serum creatine kinase in the iohexol-alone group was observed, compared with no increase in the SBECD-iohexol group. The mean arterial pressure and rate pressure product were depressed in the iohexol-alone group, but not in the SBECD-iohexol group, or controls. No difference in infarct size or serum creatinine among the groups was observed. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that SBECD-iohexol is superior to iohexol alone, for both the preservation of cardiomyocyte integrity and preservation of myocardial function in myocardial ischemia.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Contrast Media , Animals , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Humans , Iohexol/adverse effects , Kidney , Male , Pilot Projects , Rats
2.
J Neurol Sci ; 415: 116935, 2020 08 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32534807

ABSTRACT

Here, in Part II of a duology on the characterization and potential treatment for COVID-19, we characterize the application of an innovative treatment regimen for the prevention of the transition from mild to severe COVID-19, as well as detail an intensive immunotherapy intervention hypothesis. We propose as a putative randomized controlled trial that high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin (HDMTX-LR) rescue can abolish 'PANIC', thereby 'left-shifting' severe COVID-19 patients to the group majority of those infected with SARS-CoV-2, who are designated as having mild, even asymptomatic, disease. HDMTX-LR is endowed with broadly pleiotropic properties and is a repurposed, generic, inexpensive, and widely available agent which can be administered early in the course of severe COVID-19 thus rescuing the critical and irreplaceable gas-exchange alveoli. Further, we describe a preventative treatment intervention regimen for those designated as having mild to moderate COVID-19 disease, but who exhibit features which herald the transition to the severe variant of this disease. Both of our proposed hypothesis-driven questions should be urgently subjected to rigorous assessment in the context of randomized controlled trials, in order to confirm or refute the contention that the approaches characterized herein, are in fact capable of exerting mitigating, if not abolishing, effects upon SARS-CoV-2 triggered 'PANIC Attack'. Confirmation of our immunotherapy hypothesis would have far-reaching ramifications for the current pandemic, along with yielding invaluable lessons which could be leveraged to more effectively prepare for the next challenge to global health.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Clinical Trial Protocols as Topic , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Leucovorin/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , COVID-19 , Disease Management , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy/methods , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Cephalalgia ; 39(1): 3-14, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30449151

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of external trigeminal nerve stimulation for acute pain relief during migraine attacks with or without aura via a sham-controlled trial. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study conducted across three headache centers in the United States. Adult patients who were experiencing an acute migraine attack with or without aura were recruited on site and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either verum or sham external trigeminal nerve stimulation treatment (CEFALY Technology) for 1 hour. Pain intensity was scored using a visual analogue scale (0 = no pain to 10 = maximum pain). The primary outcome measure was the mean change in pain intensity at 1 hour compared to baseline. RESULTS: A total of 109 participants were screened between February 1, 2016 and March 31, 2017. Of these, 106 patients were randomized and included in the intention-to-treat analysis (verum: n = 52; sham: n = 54). The primary outcome measure was significantly more reduced in the verum group than in the sham group: -3.46 ± 2.32 versus -1.78 ± 1.89 ( p < 0.0001), or -59% versus -30% ( p < 0.0001). With regards to migraine subgroups, there was a significant difference in pain reduction between verum and sham for 'migraine without aura' attacks: mean visual analogue scale reduction at 1 hour was -3.3 ± 2.4 for the verum group versus -1.7 ± 1.9 for the sham group ( p = 0.0006). For 'migraine with aura' attacks, pain reduction was numerically greater for verum versus sham, but did not reach significance: mean visual analogue scale reduction at 1 hour was -4.3 ± 1.8 for the verum group versus -2.6 ± 1.9 for the sham group ( p = 0.060). No serious adverse events were reported and five minor adverse events occurred in the verum group. CONCLUSION: One-hour treatment with external trigeminal nerve stimulation resulted in significant headache pain relief compared to sham stimulation and was well tolerated, suggesting it may be a safe and effective acute treatment for migraine attacks. STUDY PROTOCOL: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02590939.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Migraine Disorders/therapy , Pain Management/methods , Trigeminal Nerve/physiology , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
4.
J Neurol Sci ; 372: 187-195, 2017 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28017209

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: At sufficiently high doses, methotrexate (HDMTX) achieves substantial CNS penetration, whereas other tissues can be rescued from the effects of HDMTX by leucovorin rescue (LR), which does not penetrate the blood-brain barrier. OBJECTIVES: To report on the efficacy and safety of HDMTX with LR (HDMTX-LR), in the treatment of acute demyelinating inflammatory CNS syndromes refractory to conventional immunotherapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 12 patients treated (6 multiple sclerosis [MS], 4 neuromyelitis optica [NMO], and 2 Sjogren's syndrome myelopathy [SSM]) with HDMTX-LR after failing to improve, or exhibiting worsening following conventional immunotherapy. 11 patients were followed for a total of 6months following HDMTX-LR (one was lost to follow up after 1month); and clinical findings were documented at 1month, 3months, and 6months following HDMTX-LR therapy. RESULTS: Ten patients demonstrated both clinical and radiologic evidence of near, if not complete, abolishment of disease activity, in conjunction with impressive reconstitution of neurologic function in the 6-month period following HDMTX-LR. Mean Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) prior to HDMTX-LR was 8.1 (±1.4). Following HDMTX-LR, mean EDSS was 6.6 (±2.4) at 1month, 5.8 (±2.3) at 3months, and 5.7 (±2.3) at 6months. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective assessment of treatment-recalcitrant fulminant inflammatory CNS syndromes, HDMTX-LR was observed to be a safe and highly effective treatment, producing the rapid and near complete cessation of disease activity, in conjunction with an important corresponding and 'durable remission' in the majority of our small treatment cohort.


Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Neuromyelitis Optica/drug therapy , Sjogren's Syndrome/drug therapy , Adult , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/drug effects , Brain/pathology , Disability Evaluation , Drug Repositioning , Drug Resistance , Female , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Leucovorin/adverse effects , Male , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Sclerosis/pathology , Neuromyelitis Optica/diagnostic imaging , Neuromyelitis Optica/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Sjogren's Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Sjogren's Syndrome/pathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Neuroimaging ; 26(5): 511-8, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27171830

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a serious complication of the use of iodinated contrast agents. This problem is particularly acute in interventional neurology and interventional cardiology, probably due to the intra-arterial route of injection, high contrast volumes, and preexisting risk factors of these patients. In an attempt to develop a contrast agent that is less damaging to the kidneys, we have studied the effects of adding a small amount of the substituted cyclodextrin, sulfobutyl-ether-ß-cyclodextrin (SBECD), to iohexol in rodent models of renal toxicity. METHODS: Renally compromised mice and rats were injected with iohexol and iohexol-SBECD via the tail vein. The renal pathology, creatinine clearance, and survival benefits of iohexol-SBECD were studied. The safety of direct intra-arterial injection of the iohexol-SBECD formulation was studied in a dog heart model system. Mechanism of action studies in cell culture model using a human kidney cell line was performed using flow cytometry. RESULTS: Nephrotoxicity was significantly reduced using iohexol-SBECD compared to iohexol alone, at mole ratios of iohexol:SBECD of 1:0.025. SBECD increased survival from 50% to 88% in a rat survival study. In the dog heart model, iohexol-SBECD was safe. Cell culture studies suggest that SBECD interferes with the early stages of contrast-induced apoptosis in a human renal cell line. CONCLUSION: We have shown that the addition of a small amount of SBECD (one molecule of SBECD per 40 iohexol molecules) significantly protects rodent kidneys from CI-AKI. Further development of this new formulation of iodinated contrast is warranted.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Acute Kidney Injury/prevention & control , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Iohexol/adverse effects , Kidney/drug effects , beta-Cyclodextrins/pharmacology , Animals , Apoptosis , Cell Line/drug effects , Contrast Media/chemistry , Contrast Media/pharmacology , Disease Models, Animal , Dogs , Female , Iohexol/chemistry , Iohexol/pharmacology , Kidney/pathology , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , beta-Cyclodextrins/adverse effects , beta-Cyclodextrins/chemistry
6.
Neurol Clin Pract ; 4(2): 95, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29443227
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...