Fluctuations of Steady-State Accommodation Is a Marker for Screening Spasm of Near Reflex.

Purpose: To determine the utility of root mean squared (RMS) deviations of steady-state accommodation as a noncycloplegic marker for spasm of near reflex (SNR) vis-à-vis regular refractive errors. Methods: Binocular steady-state responses of accommodation, pupil, and vergence of 20 patients with accommodative spasm subtype of SNR (SNR-A; 9-23 years) and 91 with regular refractive errors (29 emmetropes, 41 myopes, 21 hyperopes; 19-38 years) was recorded in the uncorrected refractive error state for 120 seconds using a dynamic (50 frames per second), infrared photorefractor. Mean and RMS deviation of raw data was calculated for three 20-second-long epochs and their diagnostic utility was determined using standard ROC curves. Results: RMS deviations of accommodation increased with mean refractive error in SNR-A (y = -0.23x + 0.38; r2 = 0.69; P < 0.001) and regular refractive error (y = -0.02x + 0.10; r2 = 0.14; P = 0.002) cohorts, albeit with steeper slope and higher y-intercept in the former rather than the latter cohort. RMS deviation of 0.19D reliably distinguished SNR-A from regular refractive errors with a sensitivity and specificity of 95.2% and 92.2%, respectively [mean (±1 SEM) area under ROC curve: 0.98 ± 0.01]. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under ROC curve for RMS deviations of pupil (66.7%, 80%, and 0.70 ± 0.09) and vergence (52.4%, 84.6%, and 0.68 ± 0.08) were smaller than accommodation. Conclusions: RMS deviations of steady-state accommodation is a robust noncycloplegic marker for differentiating SNR-A from regular refractive errors. Pupil and vergence fluctuations have limited utility in this regard. Translational Relevance: RMS deviations of accommodation may be easily obtained using commercial photorefractors, and the cut-off values reported herein may be implemented to identify SNR-A during refractive error screening.

Spasm of near reflex: a comprehensive management protocol and treatment outcomes.

PURPOSE: To report a consolidated management protocol for patients with spasm of near reflex (SNR), including classification of cases as mild, moderate, and severe based on treatment outcomes. METHODS: Patients with SNR treated at a single institution between August 2016 and November 2018 were included. Management of SNR included modified optical fogging, vision therapy, and pharmacological intervention (cyclopentolate eye drops and, if required, atropine eye drops). Outcome measures were visual acuity (20/25 or better) and refractive error (reduction of excessive myopia). RESULTS: Of 1,306 patients examined during the study period, 66 were diagnosed with SNR, yielding a prevalence of 5% among first-time patients visiting our binocular vision and orthoptics clinic. Of the 45 patients recruited for this study (mean age, 14 ± 5 years; 24 males), all three near-triad components were involved in 11 patients (24%), only the accommodation component in 32 (71%), and only the convergence component in 2 (4%). SNR was relieved in the first post-cyclopentolate refraction visit or with the modified optical fogging technique in 29 patients (66%; mild SNR) and with one-time usage of atropine eyedrops in 10 patients (22%; moderate SNR). In 6 patients (13%), atropine was continued long-term (severe SNR). Of 15 patients with long-term follow-up (1 year), 11 (73%) had persistent relief of SNR. CONCLUSIONS: In our study cohort, SNR with accommodation component was the most common and could be largely relaxed through a one-time use of cycloplegic eye drops and optical intervention. Only severe forms of SNR may require extended use of strong cycloplegics.

Spasm of Near Reflex: Objective Assessment of the Near-Triad.

Purpose: To characterize binocular steady-state accommodation, pupil and convergence responses (near triad) in spasm of near reflex (SNR) before and after optical and pharmacological intervention. To identify the putative source of SNR in the neural control schema of accommodation-vergence interaction using controls-engineering modeling. Methods: Near-triad of 15 patients with SNR (9 to 23 years) was recorded using an infrared photorefractor at 2m viewing distance for 120s during clinical presentation, after optical fogging intended to relieve spasm, with cycloplegia, post-cycloplegia and long-term follow-up visits. Data were also collected without cycloplegia in 15 age-matched controls. Schor (1999) model was used to computationally simulate accommodation and vergence responses of controls and SNR. Results: Both eyes of SNR exhibited significant myopia and refraction fluctuations (<1.0Hz) during clinical presentation [median (25th to 75th IQR) refraction: -1.7D (-3.2 to -0.8D); root mean squared (RMS) deviation: 1.1D (0.5 to 1.5D)], relative to controls [0.8D (-0.03 to 1.4D); 0.2D (0.1 to 0.3D)] (p < 0.001). These decreased after optical fogging, largely eliminated with cycloplegia and partially re-appeared in the post-cycloplegia and follow-up visits. SNR responses could be modeled by increasing the gain and decay time of tonic accommodation, vis-à-vis, controls. Pupil and convergence responses in SNR were similar to controls at all visits (p > 0.1). Conclusions: Exaggerated fluctuations of steady-state accommodation may be a signature feature of SNR, even while their pupil and convergence responses may remain unaffected. These fluctuations may arise from the tonic accommodation controller, the properties of which could be potentially altered after optical fogging to relieve the disorder.