ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The impact of gender on the outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains a topic of active discussion with limited exploration thus far. The study aims to elucidate the gender effect on clinical outcomes, complications, pre- and postoperative radiological outcomes following the implantation of a medial UKA at mid-term follow-up in a large section of patients. METHODS: This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study encompassing patients undergoing medial UKA between 2011 and 2019. The International Knee Society (IKS) Knee and Function score, patient satisfaction, complications, revisions, pre- and postoperative radiological outcomes (coronal plane alignment, femoral and tibial component positioning, posterior tibial slope) were evaluated. Survival rate at the time of the last follow-up was also recorded. RESULTS: Of the 366 knees that met the inclusion criteria, 10 were lost to follow-up, accounting for a 2.7% loss. Mean follow-up was 5.2 ± 2 years [2.1-11.3]. Out of the total population, 205 patients were females (57.6%, 205/356) and 151 were males (42.4%, 151/356). Men exhibited superior pre- and postoperative IKS function scores (p = 0.017). However, no significant differences were observed between women and men regarding improvements of IKS Knee and Function scores, radiographic outcomes and implant survivorship. CONCLUSION: At a mean follow-up of 5 years, this study revealed no significant impact of gender on clinical outcomes and complications in patients undergoing medial UKA. Furthermore, no significant differences were evident in radiographic outcomes, implant positioning and knee phenotype. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
ABSTRACT
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is considered an excellent alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the treatment of unicompartmental femoro-tibial degeneration with superior functional scores, reduced morbidity and fewer complications. However, revision rates are higher, mainly during the early postoperative period. Failures are attributed to incorrect indications, surgical technical errors and to the low threshold to revision. Several clinical and radiological parameters have to be considered for a correct indication. A high surgical volume is mandatory to assure optimal outcome and survivorship.
La prothèse unicompartimentale du genou (PUC) est considérée comme une excellente alternative à la prothèse totale du genou (PTG) dans le traitement de l'arthrose monocompartimentale avec des scores fonctionnels supérieurs, une morbidité réduite et des taux de complications plus faibles. Cependant, les taux de révision sont plus élevés et se produisent principalement durant la période postopératoire précoce. Ils sont attribués à des indications incorrectes, à des erreurs chirurgicales et au fait que le seuil de révision est plus bas que pour une PTG. Plusieurs paramètres cliniques et radiologiques doivent être pris en considération afin de poser la bonne indication. Un volume chirurgical suffisant est nécessaire pour obtenir un résultat optimal et une survie prolongée de la PUC.
