Valuing mortality attributable to present and future temperature extremes in Argentina.

This study analyzes the weather-related health damage of present and future extreme temperatures in Argentina. Focusing on mortality, short-term impacts of temperature are obtained by regressing monthly mortality rates on inter-annual monthly weather variability. For this purpose, a countrywide panel dataset at the municipal level was constructed from the universe of deaths between 2010 and 2019, and daily meteorological records from the ERA5 weather dataset. Then, NASA Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Projections (NEX-GDDP) are used to project future mortality by 2085 under two climate scenarios. Finally, present and future mortality-related economic damages are assessed using the Value of a Statistical Life. The results show that one additional day of extreme temperatures increase all-cause mortality rates relative to mild weather and that the impact of hotter-than-average temperatures is greater in magnitude than that of colder ones. Substantial heterogeneity exists between causes of death and age groups, with older people facing greater risks, while the results for gender are inconclusive. All days of extreme cold in a year generate damage equivalent to 0.64% of GDP, while heat damage is 0.11% of GDP. The total damage by extreme temperatures adds up to 0.75% of the 2019 GDP. When future temperatures are valued, the total damage increases by an additional 1.45% under scenario RCP8.5 because the lower mortality occurring on cold days only partially offsets the increase in the number of hot days. On the contrary, if temperature changes were to be mild (i.e., under scenario RCP4.5), overall mortality would be lower at the national level and the corresponding damages would decrease by 0.02%.

A Global-Level Model of the Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Child Stunting via Income and Food Price in 2030.

BACKGROUND: In 2016, 23% of children (155 million) aged [Formula: see text] were stunted. Global-level modeling has consistently found climate change impacts on food production are likely to impair progress on reducing undernutrition. OBJECTIVES: We adopt a new perspective, assessing how climate change may affect child stunting via its impacts on two interacting socioeconomic drivers: incomes of the poorest 20% of populations (due to climate impacts on crop production, health, labor productivity, and disasters) and food prices. METHODS: We developed a statistical model to project moderate and severe stunting in children aged [Formula: see text] at the national level in 2030 under low and high climate change scenarios combined with poverty and prosperity scenarios in 44 countries. RESULTS: We estimated that in the absence of climate change, 110 million children aged [Formula: see text] would be stunted in 2030 under the poverty scenario in comparison with 83 million under the prosperity scenario. Estimates of climate change-attributable stunting ranged from 570,000 under the prosperity/low climate change scenario to [Formula: see text] under the poverty/high climate change scenario. The projected impact of climate change on stunting was greater in rural vs. urban areas under both socioeconomic scenarios. In countries with lower incomes and relatively high food prices, we projected that rising prices would tend to increase stunting, whereas in countries with higher incomes and relatively low food prices, rising prices would tend to decrease stunting. These findings suggest that food prices that provide decent incomes to farmers alongside high employment with living wages will reduce undernutrition and vulnerability to climate change. CONCLUSIONS: Shifting the focus from food production to interactions between incomes and food price provides new insights. Futures that protect health should consider not just availability, accessibility, and quality of food, but also the incomes generated by those producing the food. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2916.