Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 76
Filter
1.
J Dent Res ; 99(8): 891-897, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32325007

ABSTRACT

In the United States, state Medicaid programs pay for medical and dental care for children from low-income families and support nondental primary care providers delivering preventive oral health services (POHS) to young children in medical offices ("medical POHS"). Despite the potential of these policies to expand access to care, there is concern that they may replace dental visits with medical POHS. Using Medicaid claims from 38 states from 2006 to 2014, we conducted a repeated cross-sectional study and used linear probability regression to estimate the association between the annual proportion of children in a county receiving medical POHS and the probability that a child received 1) dental POHS and 2) a dental visit in a given year. Models included county and year fixed effects and controlled for child- and county-level factors, and standard errors were clustered at the state level. In a weighted population of 45.1 million child-years (age, 6 mo to <6 y), we found no significant nor substantively important association between the proportion of children in a county receiving medical POHS and the probability that a child received dental POHS or a dental visit. Additionally, we found an almost zero probability (<0.001) that the reduction in dental POHS was at least as large as the expansion in medical POHS (full substitution) and a 0.50 probability that increased medical POHS was associated with an increase in dental POHS of at least 6.6% of the expansion of medical POHS. Results were similar when receipt of dental visits was examined. This study failed to find evidence that medical POHS replaced dental visits for young children enrolled in Medicaid and, in fact, offers evidence that increased medical POHS was associated with increased utilization of dental care. Given lower-than-desired rates of dental visits for this population, delivery of medical POHS should be expanded.


Subject(s)
Dental Care for Children , Medicaid , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Infant , Male , Oral Health , Preventive Health Services , United States
2.
JDR Clin Trans Res ; 4(2): 167-177, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30931710

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the oral health screening and referral practices of pediatric providers, their adherence to American Academy of Pediatrics oral health guidelines, and barriers to adherence. METHODS: Providers in 10 pediatric practices participating in the North Carolina Quality Improvement Initiative, funded by the Child Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009, were asked to complete a 91-item questionnaire. Questions on risk assessment and referral practices were based on those recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Adherence to oral health guidelines was assessed by practitioners' evaluation of 4 vignettes presenting screening results for an 18-mo-old child with different levels of risk and caries status. Respondents chose referral recommendations assuming adequate and inadequate dentist workforces. Logit models determined the association between barriers specified in Cabana's framework and adherence (count of 6 to 8 adherent vignettes vs. 0 to 5). RESULTS: Of 72 eligible providers, 53 (74%) responded. Almost everyone (98.1%) screened for dental problems; 45.2% referred in at least half of well-child visits. Respondents were aware of oral health guidelines, expressed strong agreement with them, and reported confidence in providing preventive oral health services. Yet they underreferred by an average of 42% per vignette for the 7 clinical vignette-workforce scenarios requiring an immediate referral. Frequently cited barriers were providers' beliefs that 1) parents are poorly motivated to seek dental care, 2) oral health counseling has a small effect on parent behaviors, 3) there is a shortage of dentists in their community who will see infants and toddlers, and 4) information systems to support referrals are insufficient. CONCLUSION: Pediatric clinicians' beliefs lead to a conscious decision not to refer many patients, even when children should be referred. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: Evidence suggests that the primary care-dental referral process needs improvement. This study identifies barriers to delivering recommended preventive oral health services in pediatrics. The information can be used to improve the screening and referral process and, thus, the quality of preventive oral health services provided in primary care. Results also can guide researchers on the selection of interventions that need testing and might close gaps in the referral process and improve access to dental care.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries , Oral Health , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , North Carolina , Primary Health Care , Referral and Consultation , United States
3.
JDR Clin Trans Res ; 2(4): 353-362, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28944292

ABSTRACT

The objective of the study was to examine the mediating effect of child dental use on the effectiveness of North Carolina Early Head Start (EHS) in improving oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). In total, 479 parents of children enrolled in EHS and 699 parents of Medicaid-matched children were interviewed at baseline when children were approximately 10 mo old and 24 mo later. In this quasi-experimental study, mediation analysis was performed using the counterfactual framework analysis, which employed 2 logit models with random effects: 1) for the mediator as a function of the treatment and covariates and 2) for the outcome as a function of the treatment, mediator, and covariates. The covariates were baseline dental OHRQoL, dental need, survey language, and a propensity score. We used in-person computer-assisted, structured interviews to collect information on demographic characteristics and dental use and to administer the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale, a measure of OHRQoL. Dental use had a mediation effect in the undesired direction with a 2-percentage point increase in the probability of any negative impact to OHRQoL (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3%-3.9%). Even with higher dental use by EHS participants, the probability of any negative impact to OHRQoL was approximately 8 percentage points lower if an individual were moved from the non-EHS group to the EHS group (95% CI, -13.9% to -1.2%). EHS increases child dental use, which worsens family OHRQoL. However, EHS is associated with improved OHRQoL overall. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Study results can inform policy makers that comprehensive early childhood education programs improve oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) for disadvantaged families with young children in pathways outside of clinical dental care. This awareness and its promotion can lead to greater resource investments in early childhood education programs. Information about the negative impacts of dental use on OHRQoL should lead to the development and testing of strategies in dentistry and Early Head Start to improve dental care experiences.

4.
J Dent Res ; 96(10): 1115-1121, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28644755

ABSTRACT

The emergence of first permanent molars (FPMs) and second permanent molars (SPMs) is an important developmental milestone influencing caries risk and the timing of sealant placement. Emergence times have been shown to vary by sex and race/ethnicity, while recent reports suggest a positive association with adiposity. Amid the changing demographics of the US population and the rising rates of pediatric overweight/obesity, we sought to examine the association of body mass index (BMI) with FPM/SPM emergence in a representative sample of US children and adolescents. We used cross-sectional data from 3 consecutive cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2009 to 2014). The FPM analysis included ages 4 to 8 y ( n = 3,102 representing ~20 million children), and the SPM analysis included ages 9 to 13 y ( n = 2,774 representing ~19 million children/adolescents). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's growth chart data were used to calculate age- and sex-specific BMI percentiles, as measures of adiposity. Initial data analyses relied on descriptive statistics and stratified analyses. We used multivariate methods, including survey linear and ordinal logistic regression and marginal effects estimation to quantify the association between pediatric overweight/obesity and FPM/SPM emergence, adjusting for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Forty-eight percent of 6-y-olds and 98% of 8-y-olds had all FPMs emerged, whereas SPM emergence varied more. Blacks (vs. whites) and females (vs. males) experienced earlier emergence of FPMs and SPMs. Overweight/obesity was associated with earlier FPM emergence, particularly among black females. Obesity but not overweight was associated with earlier SPM emergence. Overall, overweight/obesity accounted for 6 to 12 mo of dental acceleration. This study's results emanate from the most recent US-representative data and affirm that FPM/SPM emergence varies by race/ethnicity and sex and is positively influenced by BMI. Future research should further elucidate these associations with detailed eruption data and examine the implications of this variation for clinical care.


Subject(s)
Molar , Tooth Eruption/physiology , Adolescent , Age Factors , Body Mass Index , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dental Caries/prevention & control , Dentition, Permanent , Female , Humans , Male , Nutrition Surveys , Pit and Fissure Sealants/therapeutic use , Sex Factors , United States
5.
J Public Health Dent ; 76 Suppl 1: S4-S10, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27990676

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A new set of competencies for entry-level specialists in dental public health (DPH) developed in 2016 updates the 1998 version. Our objective is to provide some context and perspective on this update. METHODS: We discuss the evolution of this dental specialty, how it differs from other dental specialties, and its importance for the public's oral health. Some societal trends that provide the rationale for this update are summarized. The ways in which this set of competencies differs from the last version are described. RESULTS: The first set of behavioral objectives was established in 1974 and updated at workshops in 1988 and 1997. Advanced population-based knowledge and public health perspectives beyond that obtained in predoctoral dental education continue to be essential for the nation's oral health. Since 1998, the impact of the digital age, advances in science and technology, changes in population demographics, health status and increasing inequalities, treatment needs, prevention and treatment modalities, healthcare delivery systems, financing, personnel, legislation, and regulations have all influenced DPH practice. The updated competencies include guiding principles for the specialty, a new focus on social determinants of health, and more flexibility to address the increasing complexity and interdisciplinary nature of public health problems and the expanding knowledge and skills needed to address them. The rapid expansion of public health education might serve as an important pipeline for future DPH specialists. CONCLUSION: The updated competencies can guide the educational preparation of DPH specialists and are aligned with the rapidly changing environment.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Public Health Dentistry/education , Public Health Dentistry/standards , Curriculum/trends , Education, Dental/trends , Humans , United States
6.
J Dent Res ; 93(10): 972-9, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25154834

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study were to determine the impact of enamel fluorosis and dental caries on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in North Carolina schoolchildren and their families. Students (n = 7,686) enrolled in 398 classrooms in grades K-12 were recruited for a onetime survey. Parents of students in grades K-3 and 4-12 completed the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) and Family Impact Scale (FIS), respectively. Students in grades 4-12 completed the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ8-10 in grades 4-5; CPQ11-14 in grades 6-12). All students were examined for fluorosis (Dean's index) and caries experience (d2-3fs or D2-3MFS indices). OHRQoL scores (sum response codes) were analyzed for their association with fluorosis categories and sum of d2-3fs and D2-3MFS according to ordinary least squares regression with SAS procedures for multiple imputation and analysis of complex survey data. Differences in OHRQoL scores were evaluated against statistical and minimal important difference (MID) thresholds. Of 5,484 examined students, 71.8% had no fluorosis; 24.4%, questionable to very mild fluorosis; and 3.7%, mild, moderate, or severe fluorosis. Caries categories were as follows: none (43.1%), low (28.6%), and moderate to high (28.2%). No associations between fluorosis and any OHRQoL scales met statistical or MID thresholds. The difference (5.8 points) in unadjusted mean ECOHIS scores for the no-caries and moderate-to-high caries groups exceeded the MID estimate (2.7 points) for that scale. The difference in mean FIS scores (1.5 points) for the no-caries and moderate-to-high groups exceeded the MID value (1.2 points). The sum of d2-3fs and D2-3MFS scores was positively associated with CPQ11-14 (B = 0.240, p < .001), ECOHIS (B = 0.252, p ≤ .001), and FIS (B = 0.096, p ≤ .01) scores in ordinary least squares regression models. A child's caries experience negatively affects OHRQoL, while fluorosis has little impact.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/psychology , Fluorosis, Dental/psychology , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Cariostatic Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , DMF Index , Dental Care , Dental Caries/prevention & control , Educational Status , Family Health , Fluorides/therapeutic use , Fluorosis, Dental/classification , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , North Carolina , Oral Health , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Self Concept , Socioeconomic Factors
7.
J Dent Res ; 93(7): 633-8, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24891593

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Nearly all state Medicaid programs reimburse nondental primary care providers (PCPs) for providing preventive oral health services to young children; yet, little is known about how treatment outcomes compare with children visiting dentists. This study compared the association between the provider of preventive services (PCP, dentist, or both) with Medicaid-enrolled children before their third birthday and subsequent dental caries-related treatment (CRT) and CRT payment. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of young children enrolled in North Carolina Medicaid during 2000 to 2006. The annual number of CRT and CRT payments per child between the ages of 3 and 5 yr were estimated with a zero-inflated negative binomial regression and a hurdle model, respectively. Models were adjusted for relevant child- and county-level characteristics and used propensity score weighting to address observed confounding. RESULTS: We examined 41,453 children with > 1 preventive oral health visit from a PCP, dentist, or both before their third birthday. Unadjusted annual mean CRT and payments were lowest among children who had only PCP visits (CRT = 0.87, payment = $172) and higher among children with only dentist visits (CRT = 1.48, payment = $234) and both PCP and dentist visits (CRT = 1.52, payment = $273). Adjusted results indicated that children who had dentist visits (with or without PCP visits) had significantly more CRT and higher CRT payments per year during the ages of 3 and 4 yr than children who had only PCP visits. However, these differences attenuated each year after age 3 yr. CONCLUSIONS: Because of children's increased opportunity to receive multiple visits in medical offices during well-child visits, preventive oral health services provided by PCPs may lead to a greater reduction in CRT than dentist visits alone. This study supports guidelines and reimbursement policies that allow preventive dental visits based on individual needs.


Subject(s)
Dental Care for Children , Preventive Dentistry , Primary Health Care , Child, Preschool , Composite Resins/economics , Crowns/economics , Crowns/statistics & numerical data , Dental Amalgam/economics , Dental Care for Children/economics , Dental Care for Children/statistics & numerical data , Dental Caries/economics , Dental Caries/therapy , Dental Materials/economics , Dental Restoration, Permanent/economics , Dental Restoration, Permanent/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Male , Medicaid/economics , Preventive Dentistry/economics , Preventive Dentistry/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/economics , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Pulpectomy/economics , Pulpectomy/statistics & numerical data , Pulpotomy/economics , Pulpotomy/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Stainless Steel/economics , Tooth Extraction/economics , Tooth Extraction/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , United States
8.
J Dent Res ; 91(3): 282-7, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22202124

ABSTRACT

The aims of this study were to estimate the caries-preventive effects of a school-based weekly fluoride mouthrinse (FMR) program and to determine whether its effectiveness varied by school-level caries risk. We used clinical and parent-reported data for 1,363 children in grades 1 through 5 from a probability sample of North Carolina (NC) schoolchildren. Children's caries experience was measured using decayed and filled primary (d(2,3)fs) and total (d(2,3)fs+D(2,3)MFS) tooth surfaces. Program participation was quantified using 'FMR years'. To estimate caries risk at program entry, children were matched with NC kindergarten-surveillance data representing school-level mean untreated decay (low-risk school: < 1 and high-risk school: ≥ 1 untreated carious teeth). Mean d(2,3)fs was 4.1 [95% confidence limits (CL) = 3.7, 4.5]. Overall, each 'FMR year' was associated with weak reduction of caries prevalence in the primary [prevalence ratio (PR) = 0.98; 95% CL = 0.90, 1.06] and the mixed dentition (PR = 0.98; 95% CL = 0.91, 1.05). We found a trend toward a larger caries-preventive benefit among children in high-risk schools compared with those in low-risk schools (i.e., 55% vs. 10% caries reduction for 5 to 6 yrs of FMR participation compared to none). Although this difference was not confirmed statistically, our results indicate that children in high-risk schools, as identified by school-level surveillance data, may experience substantial caries-preventive benefits from long-term FMR participation.


Subject(s)
Cariostatic Agents/therapeutic use , Dental Caries/epidemiology , Dental Caries/prevention & control , Fluorides/therapeutic use , Mouthwashes/therapeutic use , School Dentistry , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , DMF Index , Humans , Multivariate Analysis , North Carolina/epidemiology , Prevalence , Regression Analysis , Risk
9.
Caries Res ; 42(6): 419-28, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18832828

ABSTRACT

A biomarker for lifetime fluoride exposure would facilitate population-based research and policy making but currently does not exist. This study examined the suitability of primary tooth dentin as a biomarker by comparing dentin fluoride concentration and fluoride exposures. Ninety-nine children's exfoliated primary teeth were collected from 2 fluoridated and 2 fluoride-deficient communities in North Carolina. Coronal dentin was isolated by microdissection and fluoride concentration assayed using the microdiffusion, ion-specific electrode technique. Information on children's fluoride exposures since birth from drinking water, toothpaste, supplements, rinses, food and beverages was collected by a self-reported questionnaire administered to caregivers. Only a small portion of the variance (10%) in incisor dentin fluoride (mean 792, SD 402 mg/kg) was accounted for by the best linear regression model as evaluated by the adjusted R(2). A moderate portion of the variance (60%) of molar dentin fluoride (mean 768, SD 489 mg/kg) was predicted by dietary fluoride supplement exposures, community of residence, and frequent tea consumption. Results for molars suggest that primary tooth dentin concentration may prove to be a satisfactory biomarker for fluoride exposure.


Subject(s)
Cariostatic Agents/analysis , Dentin/chemistry , Environmental Exposure , Fluorides/analysis , Tooth Exfoliation , Tooth, Deciduous/chemistry , Beverages , Biomarkers/analysis , Cariostatic Agents/administration & dosage , Child , Child, Preschool , Dietary Supplements , Diffusion , Female , Fluoridation , Fluorides/administration & dosage , Food , Humans , Incisor/chemistry , Ion-Selective Electrodes , Male , Microdissection , Molar/chemistry , Mouthwashes/administration & dosage , North Carolina , Tea , Toothpastes/administration & dosage , Water Supply/analysis
10.
J Dent Res ; 87(2): 169-74, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18218845

ABSTRACT

A barrier to providing sealants is concern about inadvertently sealing over caries. This meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of sealants in preventing caries progression. We searched electronic databases for comparative studies examining caries progression in sealed permanent teeth. We used a random-effects model to estimate percentage reduction in the probability of caries progression in sealed vs. unsealed carious teeth. Six studies, including 4 randomized-controlled trials (RCT) judged to be of fair quality, were included in the analysis (384 persons, 840 teeth, and 1090 surfaces). The median annual percentage of non-cavitated lesions progressing was 2.6% for sealed and 12.6% for unsealed carious teeth. The summary prevented fraction for RCT was 71.3% (95%CI: 52.8%-82.5, no heterogeneity) up to 5 years after placement. Despite variation among studies in design and conduct, sensitivity analysis found the effect to be consistent in size and direction. Sealing non-cavitated caries in permanent teeth is effective in reducing caries progression.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/prevention & control , Pit and Fissure Sealants/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Disease Progression , Follow-Up Studies , Glass Ionomer Cements/therapeutic use , Humans , Models, Statistical , Probability , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Resin Cements/therapeutic use , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
11.
J Dent Res ; 84(10): 942-6, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16183795

ABSTRACT

When randomization is not possible, researchers must control for non-random assignment to experimental groups. One technique for statistical adjustment for non-random assignment is through the use of a two-stage analytical technique. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the use of this technique to control for selection bias in examining the effects of the The Supplemental Program for Women, Infants, and Children's (WIC) on dental visits. From 5 data sources, an analysis file was constructed for 49,512 children ages 1-5 years. The two-stage technique was used to control for selection bias in WIC participation, the potentially endogenous variable. Specification tests showed that WIC participation was not random and that selection bias was present. The effects of the WIC on dental use differed by 36% after adjustment for selection bias by means of the two-stage technique. This technique can be used to control for potential selection bias in dental research when randomization is not possible.


Subject(s)
Aid to Families with Dependent Children , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Dental Care for Children/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Research/methods , Logistic Models , Adult , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Delivery of Health Care , Dental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Dental Health Surveys , Dental Research/methods , Female , Humans , Infant , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Models, Economic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Regression Analysis , Selection Bias , Socioeconomic Factors , United States
12.
J Dent Educ ; 65(10): 1063-72, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11699978

ABSTRACT

This paper summarizes and rates the evidence for the effectiveness of methods available to dental professionals for their use in the primary prevention of dental caries. It reviews operator-applied therapeutic agents or materials and patient counseling. Evidence of effectiveness is extracted from published systematic reviews. A search for articles since publication of these reviews was done to provide updates, and a systematic review of the caries-inhibiting effects of fluoride varnish in primary teeth is provided. Good evidence is available for the effectiveness of fluoride gel and varnish, chlorhexidine gel, and sealant when used to prevent caries in permanent teeth of children and adolescents. The evidence for effectiveness of fluoride varnish use in primary teeth, chlorhexidine varnish, and patient counseling is judged to be insufficient. Use of fluoride, chlorhexidine and sealant according to tested protocols and for the populations in which evidence of effect is available can be recommended. However, they may need to be used selectively. Estimates for the number of patients or tooth surfaces needed to treat to prevent a carious event suggest that the effects of these professional treatments are low in patients who are at reduced risk for dental caries. The literature on use of these preventive methods in individuals other than school-aged children needs expansion.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/prevention & control , Adolescent , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Cariostatic Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Databases, Bibliographic , Fluorides, Topical/administration & dosage , Fluorides, Topical/therapeutic use , Gels , Health Education, Dental , Humans , Lacquer , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Pit and Fissure Sealants
13.
Am J Public Health ; 91(11): 1877-81, 2001 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11684619

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective cohort analysis of children enrolled in the North Carolina Medicaid program compared the likelihood of restorative treatments and associated cumulative Medicaid expenditures for teeth with or without dental sealants. METHODS: We assessed the dental experience of the cohort of 15 438 children from 1985 to 1992 on the basis of enrollment and claims files. We conducted regression analyses for outcomes (caries-related services involving the occlusal surface [CRSOs] of permanent first molars) and cumulative expenditures, controlling for characteristics of the child, the treating dentist, and the child's county of residence. RESULTS: Overall, 23% of children received at least 1 sealant and 33% at least 1 CRSO. Sealants were effective in preventing CRSOs, although the degree of effectiveness was highest for children with the greater levels of CRSOs before sealant placement. Estimated cumulative Medicaid expenditures indicated expenditure savings from sealants within 2 years of application for children with 2 or more prior CRSOs. CONCLUSIONS: Sealant placement was associated with expenditure savings to Medicaid for certain high-risk children, so Medicaid and, more broadly, society will benefit by providing for sealant placement in these children.


Subject(s)
Dental Care for Children/economics , Dental Caries/economics , Dental Caries/epidemiology , Insurance, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Pit and Fissure Sealants/economics , Child , Child, Preschool , Dental Care for Children/statistics & numerical data , Dental Caries/therapy , Female , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Likelihood Functions , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Molar/pathology , North Carolina/epidemiology , Pit and Fissure Sealants/therapeutic use , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
14.
Cancer ; 92(8): 2109-16, 2001 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11596027

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Alcohol and tobacco, the primary etiologic agents for head and neck carcinoma (HNCA), cause other chronic diseases and may contribute to the high prevalence of comorbid conditions and generally poor survival of persons with HNCA. METHODS: The authors explored the prognostic role of comorbidity in persons with HNCA using Health Care Finance Administration Medicare (HCFA) files linked with the appropriate files of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. The Charlson comorbidity index was applied to in-patient data from the HCFA files. The SEER data were used to ascertain survival and identify persons with HNCA diagnosed from 1985 to 1993 (n = 9386). RESULTS: In a proportional hazards regression model adjusted for age and historic stage at diagnosis, race, gender, marital status, socioeconomic status, histologic grade, anatomic site, treatment, and pre-1991 diagnosis, Charlson index scores of 0, 1, and 2+ had estimated relative hazards (RHs) with 95 confidence intervals (CIs) of 1.00, 1.33 (95% CI, 1.21-1.47), and 1.83 (95% CI, 1.64-2.05), respectively (P value for trend < 0.0001). The adjusted RH for a Charlson index score of 1 or more compared with 0, using stratified models, was found to be greater in whites (RH, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.43-1.67) than blacks (RH, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.96-1.60), local (RH, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.50-1.96) versus distant stage (RH, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.00-1.56), and age 65-74 years (RH, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.38-1.69) versus age 85+ years (RH, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.09-1.84). CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes comorbidity as a predictor of survival in an elderly HNCA population and lends support to the inclusion of comorbidity assessment in prognostic staging of patients with HNCA diagnosed after 65 years of age.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/epidemiology , Humans , Laryngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Laryngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Mouth Neoplasms/mortality , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , SEER Program , United States/epidemiology
16.
Inquiry ; 37(1): 33-44, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10892356

ABSTRACT

North Carolina Medicaid increased nominal Medicaid reimbursement to dentists 23% from 1988 to 1991 and doubled enrollment through eligibility expansions from 1985 to 1991. Using Medicaid claims data and panel data techniques, this analysis investigates the effect of these policy changes on the probability that a dentist participated in Medicaid, and on the number of Medicaid children seen per provider per quarter. The results suggest that eligibility expansions and reimbursement rate increases were only marginally effective in increasing access to dental services for the Medicaid population.


Subject(s)
Dental Care for Children/statistics & numerical data , Dentists/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Child , Dental Care for Children/economics , Eligibility Determination , Female , Health Policy , Humans , Male , Medicaid/organization & administration , North Carolina , Regression Analysis , United States
17.
Soc Sci Med ; 51(3): 395-405, 2000 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10855926

ABSTRACT

This analysis questions the appropriateness of inflation adjustment in analyses of provider behavior by comparing results from estimations using adjusted financial variables with those from estimations using unadjusted financial variables. Using Medicaid claims from 1984-1991, we explored the effects of Medicaid reimbursement increases on dentists' participation. Using results from inflation adjusted analyses, we would conclude that a 23% nominal increase in Medicaid reimbursement rates yields no increase in the number of Medicaid children seen by dentists. In contrast, estimations based on unadjusted reimbursement rates suggest that this same 23% nominal increase in reimbursement leads to an expected 16-person (15.4%) increase in the number of Medicaid patients seen per provider per year. These analyses demonstrate that results are sensitive to adjustment for inflation. While adjusting for inflation is a generally accepted practice in health services research, doing so without evidence that providers respond to adjusted reimbursement may be unjustified. More research is needed to determine the appropriateness of inflation adjustment in analyses of provider behavior, and the circumstances under which it should or should not be done.


Subject(s)
Economics, Dental , Inflation, Economic , Medicaid/economics , Health Services Research , Humans , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , North Carolina , United States
18.
Pediatr Dent ; 21(2): 97-103, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10197333

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To characterize the patterns of dental care in the North Carolina (NC) Medicaid Program for three- and eight-year-old children who began dental treatment in the 1985-86 and 1990-91 groups. We also compared the children's patterns of care by provider (general dentists versus pediatric dentists). METHODS: Our extensive data set included claims, enrollment, and provider data. Children were assigned to one of five categories or patterns of care as follows: complete care, general anesthesia care, sporadic care, emergency only care, and no care. Statistical comparisons of the variables age, cohort year, and provider groups were made. RESULTS: The use of Medicaid dental services by both age groups was severely limited in both yearly cohorts. Pediatric dentists tended to provide more complete and less sporadic care for both age groups and both yearly cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Financing dental care through Medicaid results in very low levels of complete care among enrollees, and any plan that limits referral to pediatric dentists might adversely affect the number of enrollees who receive complete care.


Subject(s)
Dental Care for Children/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Dentists'/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Analysis of Variance , Child , Child, Preschool , Factor Analysis, Statistical , General Practice, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Humans , North Carolina , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Pediatric Dentistry/statistics & numerical data , United States
20.
J Public Health Dent ; 59(4): 239-46, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10682330

ABSTRACT

The question considered in this review is the extent to which changes in the prevalence or severity of enamel fluorosis have occurred over the last half-century. Emphasis is given to a review of those studies in which subjects are drinking water that is fluoride deficient and those in which subjects are drinking optimally fluoridated water, either adjusted or natural. Trends in fluorosis were examined using two definitions of fluorosis (definite and any signs) and three types of comparisons--comparisons of pooled estimates from all available studies that include data from different communities and time periods, comparisons of estimates from the same communities at different times, and comparisons of estimates from selected studies in the early years of fluorosis research with results of the US National Fluorosis Survey done by the National Institute of Dental Research. A clear increase in fluorosis among populations drinking community water that contains less than 0.3 ppm fluoride was found. Results of the comparisons using studies with Dean's Index pooled at different time points, comparisons in the same communities over time, and comparisons of prevalence found in selected communities before fluoride was widely available with the National Fluorosis Survey all support this conclusion. An increase in the prevalence of fluorosis in those drinking optimally fluoridated water likely has occurred as well; however, evidence for such a trend is not as clear as for fluoride deficient communities because of mixed results depending on the type of comparison. The majority of fluorosis cases continue to be mild and seem of little esthetic consequence for most of the public or dental profession. But a few cases of more severe fluorosis can be found now in some communities. Because the prevalence of fluorosis is now higher than 50 years ago, we can conclude that fluoride availability to the developing enamel during critical periods when enamel is at risk of fluorosis has increased in North American children.


Subject(s)
Fluorosis, Dental/epidemiology , Adolescent , Amelogenesis/drug effects , Cariostatic Agents/adverse effects , Cariostatic Agents/analysis , Child , Dental Enamel/drug effects , Fluoridation , Fluorides/adverse effects , Fluorides/analysis , Fluorosis, Dental/classification , Humans , North America/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Water Supply/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...