Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 120(1-4): 74-7, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16644929

ABSTRACT

Initial results are reported of a Polish-Finnish project to verify electron dose distributions calculated by treatment planning systems (TPSs), CadPlan v.6.3.2 and Theraplan v.3.5, which use different electron beam dose distribution algorithms. Treatment of gross tumour volumes representing lung and parotid cancer was simulated in an Alderson anthropomorphic phantom with thermoluminescent detectors (TLDs) (Li(2)B(4)O(7):Mn,Si) placed at selected measurement points inside its volume. The observed discrepancy between relative values of dose calculated and measured by TLDs at each of the measurement points and those calculated by the different TPSs at the same points is discussed.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Electrons/therapeutic use , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/methods , Anthropometry/methods , Benchmarking/methods , Body Burden , Finland , Humans , Poland , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/standards , Radiotherapy, Conformal/standards , Reference Values , Relative Biological Effectiveness , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 101(1-4): 477-80, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12382795

ABSTRACT

A treatment planning system (TPS) was validated in conditions of simulated radiotherapy (RT) of an anthropomorphic tissue-equivalent phantom. Individually calibrated solid MTS-N (LiF:Mg,Ti) detectors were placed within the treatment volume in this phantom which was then repeatedly irradiated by external 60Co or 6 MV X ray beams. On the basis of TLD-measured depth-dose curves for the two beams, the relative accuracy of determining dose (of the order of 1 Gy) at live depths in a water phantom is about 0.4-0.6%. In the volume of interest representing the target volume, the relative standard difference between the calculated and measured dose values ranged between 1.3% and 2.2% for the 60Co and 6 MV X ray beams, respectively. The TPS-calculated uniformity of irradiation of that volume is within 1%. While fraction-to-fraction repeatability was within 1-2%, systematic underexposure around the reference point, by 2-3%, was found in two consecutive exposures by sets of both beams.


Subject(s)
Radioisotopes/pharmacokinetics , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/methods , Absorption , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Radiotherapy Dosage , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...