ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: During the early coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020, researchers cautioned about the potential neuroinvasive capability of the virus and long-term neurological consequences. Although a few preliminary studies have found delayed communication, fine motor, and problem-solving skills in infants after COVID-19 infection, there continues to be a paucity of data on long-term development of neonates diagnosed with COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 20 neonates who acquired severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during the first wave of the pandemic (April-July 2020). At 18-24 months corrected age, we assessed neurodevelopment by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, the third edition (BSID-III), along with growth, hearing, and vision evaluation. RESULTS: The mean corrected age at assessment was 21 months 11 days ± 1 month 28 days. We found developmental delay in nearly half of the children with scores below one standard deviation in either of the BSID-III domains. Mild delay in either motor, cognitive, or language domains was found in 9 (45%) children and moderate delay in 2 (10%). Expressive language, fine motor, and receptive language were predominantly affected. None of the children had hearing impairment, blindness, or significant growth faltering including clinically severe microcephaly. The mean composite cognitive, language, and motor scores were significantly lower in those with neurodevelopmental delay (p value - 0.02, 0.000, and 0.03, respectively) without any differences in their disease characteristics. CONCLUSION: Neonates infected with SARS-CoV-2 have an increased risk of developmental delays in expressive language, fine motor, and receptive language skills at 18-24 months of age. The severity of delays is predominantly mild.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Sepsis often prompts clinicians to start empirical antibiotics in suspected neonates while awaiting diagnosis. The next-generation testing with point-of-care (POC) techniques offers a lead-time advantage that could bridge the gap by providing a timely diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective diagnostic study in 82 neonates enrolled between May and October 2022 in a level III neonatal intensive care unit. All neonates with a new episode of clinically suspected sepsis were included. Diagnostic accuracy of POC testing of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT) with standard laboratory methods was performed. RESULTS: The mean gestation age and birth weight of the neonates were 33.17 ± 4.25 weeks and 1,695.4 ± 700.74 grams, respectively. Most neonates were preterm (75%) with nearly equal proportions of early (51.22%) and late-onset (48.78%) sepsis. The POC CRP correlated well with standard CRP (r = 0.8001, 95% CI: 0.706-0.867, p < 0.0001). Among the three biomarkers, CRP had the maximum diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] - 0.73) followed by PCT (AUC - 0.65) and IL-6 (0.55). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of CRP (p = 0.46), PCT (p = 0.29), and IL-6 (p = 0.60) in early- and late-onset sepsis. The mean time for POC estimation of IL-6, PCT, and CRP was 12 ± 3 min which was significantly less compared to 366 ± 61 min for standard techniques (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: POC CRP correlates well with standard techniques of estimation, and CRP alone and in combination with PCT has good diagnostic accuracy in neonatal sepsis.
