Sedoanalgesia With Ketamine in the Emergency Department: Factors Associated With Unsatisfactory Effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE: Ketamine is a safe and widely used sedative and analgesic in children. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the response to sedoanalgesia for painful procedures in the pediatric emergency department. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in children younger than 16 years who underwent painful procedures with intravenous/intranasal ketamine between January 2016 and December 2022. We collected demographic variables, effectiveness, route of administration, indication, dose, sedation strategy, duration of procedure, and associated adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of 671 ketamine sedation procedures (411 males/260 females) were included, with a mean age of 7.2 years. Closed reduction was the most common painful procedure (53.8%), followed by burn healing (24.6%). Ketamine was administered intravenously in 93.4% of procedures and intranasally in 6.6%. The result of sedoanalgesia was satisfactory in 84.9% and unsatisfactory in 15.1%. The percentage of cases with unsatisfactory analgesia was higher with intranasal administration (36.4%; P < 0.001). In the intravenous group, the percentage of cases with unsatisfactory effectiveness (28.7%) was higher for patients younger than 2 years of age (P < 0.001). Arthrocentesis procedures were associated with the highest percentage of unsatisfactory sedoanalgesia failures among patients receiving intravenous ketamine (39.3%; P < 0.001). Intranasal ketamine patients who received a dose between 3.6 and 4 mg/kg had a significantly higher percentage of unsatisfactory sedoanalgesia (66.7%; P = 0.048). Patients receiving intravenous ketamine had significantly higher rates of unsatisfactory sedoanalgesia when the initial dose interval was 1.6 to 2 mg/kg (11.8%; P = 0.002) and when the final total dose was also 1.6 to 2 mg/kg (17.6%; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This study concludes that intravenous/intranasal ketamine can provide safe and successful analgesia in pediatric patients in the ED. At intravenous doses of 1-1.5 mg/kg, good effectiveness was achieved in almost 90% of cases. Arthrocentesis had the highest percentage of unsatisfactory results. Repeat dosing should be considered for procedures longer than 20 minutes.

Estudio multicéntrico de ingesta de imanes en los servicios de urgencias pediátricos españoles / Multicentre study of magnet ingestion in Spanish paediatric emergency departments

Introducción: Las ingestas de objetos imantados pueden presentar complicaciones en el niño, no existiendo datos epidemiológicos ni clínicos en España. Objetivos: Conocer la incidencia de ingesta de objetos imantados en los servicios de urgencias pediátricos españoles, sus características epidemiológicas y su manejo. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional prospectivo multicéntrico realizado durante 3 años. Población de referencia menores de 14 años. Resultados: La incidencia fue de 4,8/100.000 urgencias. De los 72 pacientes incluidos (edad media de 7,2 años), el 54% fueron varones. El 7% presentaron antecedentes neuropsiquiátricos. El 61% de los imanes fueron esféricos y el 69% procedían de juguetes. El tamaño fue variable con un predominio de los imanes entre 5 y 10mm (50%). El 86% fueron asintomáticos. El síntoma más frecuente fue el dolor abdominal. El 83% de los pacientes consultaron en menos de 6h y el 92% en las primeras 24h. El 31% fueron ingestas múltiples. El 15% precisó intervención endoscópica, cifra que ascendió al 36% en los casos de ingestas múltiples. No se realizó ninguna intervención quirúrgica. No se observó ninguna complicación gastrointestinal secundaria. Conclusiones: Las ingestas de imanes múltiples son menos frecuentes que las simples y en este estudio no se han observado complicaciones a pesar de que las intervenciones realizadas han sido menores que en otros estudios. (AU)

Introduction: The ingestion of magnetic objects can cause complications in children, and there are no epidemiological or clinical data on the subject in Spain. Objectives: To determine the incidence, epidemiological characteristics and management of magnet ingestion in paediatric emergency departments in Spain. Material and methods: Prospective observational multicentre study conducted over a 3-year period. The study universe consisted of patients aged less than 14 years. Results: The incidence was 4.8 cases per 100 000 emergency care episodes. Of the 72 patients included (mean age, 7.2 years), 54% were male. Seven percent had neuropsychiatric disorders. Sixty-one percent of the magnets were spherical and 69% came from toys. The size was variable, most frequently between 5 and 10mm (50%), and ranging from 3 to 30mm. Eighty-six percent of patients were asymptomatic. The most frequent symptom was abdominal pain. Eighty-three percent of the patients sought medical care within 6h of ingestion and 92% within 24h. Thirty-one percent of the cases were of multiple ingestion. Endoscopy was required for extraction in 15% of cases, a proportion that rose to 36% in the group of cases of multiple ingestion. None of the patients required surgery. We did not observe any gastrointestinal complications of magnet ingestion. Conclusions: The ingestion of multiple magnets is less frequent than single magnet ingestion, and we did not observe any complications despite the lower frequency of procedures compared to other studies. (AU)

Multicentre study of magnet ingestion in Spanish paediatric emergency departments.

INTRODUCTION: The ingestion of magnetic objects can cause complications in children, and there are no epidemiological or clinical data on the subject in Spain. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence, epidemiological characteristics and management of magnet ingestion in paediatric emergency departments in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational multicentre study conducted over a 3-year period. The study universe consisted of patients aged less than 14 years. RESULTS: The incidence was 4.8 cases per 100 000 emergency care episodes. Of the 72 patients included (mean age, 7.2 years), 54% were male. Seven percent had neuropsychiatric disorders. Sixty-one percent of the magnets were spherical and 69% came from toys. The size was variable, most frequently between 5 and 10 mm (50%), and ranging from 3 to 30 mm. Eighty-six percent of patients were asymptomatic. The most frequent symptom was abdominal pain. Eighty-three percent of the patients sought medical care within 6 h of ingestion and 92% within 24 h. Thirty-one percent of the cases were of multiple ingestion. Endoscopy was required for extraction in 15% of cases, a proportion that rose to 36% in the group of cases of multiple ingestion. None of the patients required surgery. We did not observe any gastrointestinal complications of magnet ingestion. CONCLUSIONS: The ingestion of multiple magnets is less frequent than single magnet ingestion, and we did not observe any complications despite the lower frequency of procedures compared to other studies.

Clinical Characteristics of Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant in Children: A Multicenter Study in Spain

No disponible

Child sexual abuse detection in the pediatric emergency room.

BACKGROUND: Children who report sexual abuse are often first evaluated in a Pediatric Emergency Room (ER). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe clinical characteristics and management among these children. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of child sexual abuse (CSA) cases in the ER of a tertiary hospital in Madrid over a 9-year period (January 2011 to April 2020) was conducted. 213 children up to 16 years old were included. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: An 83% of victims were girls, of whom 97.7% reported physical contact. The mean age was 8.5 ± 4.4 years, with two peaks of incidence at ages of 3 and 13. Aggressors were known by the victim in 77.8% of cases. Anogenital lesions were present in 39.9% of children who described physical contact, of which 31.7% were suspicious or specific of CSA. We obtained positive microbiological samples in 41 patients, with 14.6% specific findings for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). 23,9% received prophylaxis for bacterial STIs and 13.6% against HIV. 59.6% were followed-up in outpatient clinics. Since our protocol renovation in 2019, we observe a statistically significant increase in microbiological detection (p < .005) and outpatient follow-up (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: STIs screening should always be done when physical contact is reported for eventual treatment and perpetrator prosecution, as physical lesions are frequently not found. The optimal treatment of CSA requires the use of renewed specific protocols and the involvement of multidisciplinary trained teams to ensure adequate medical and personal care.

Infección urinaria febril en el niño con patología nefrourológica / Urinary tract infection in children with nephrourological pathology

No disponible

PCR urgente de Bordetella en lactantes menores de 3 meses, una herramienta útil en el Servicio de Urgencias Pediátricas / Urgent Bordetella PCR in infants under 3 months, a useful tool in the Pediatric Emergency Department

Introducción: En pacientes menores de 3 meses con sospecha de tosferina se recomienda ingreso y tratamiento con azitromicina debido a su mayor morbimortalidad, por lo que muchos pacientes con tos sin otros signos de alarma ingresan con antibioterapia hasta obtener el resultado de la PCR de Bordetella. La realización de esta técnica de forma urgente proporciona el diagnóstico en pocas horas. Nuestro objetivo fue determinar si su introducción en los servicios de Urgencias mejoraba el manejo de estos pacientes. Métodos: Estudio de cohortes histórico de pacientes menores de 3 meses a los que se realizó en Urgencias la PCR de Bordetella de secreciones respiratorias desde marzo de 2011 hasta diciembre de 2017. A partir de diciembre de 2015 era procesada de forma urgente. Resultados: Se realizaron 158 PCR, 16 (10%) de las cuales resultaron positivas para B. pertussis. Los resultados negativos (142; 90%) se dividen en 2 grupos de estudio: PCR-convencional, con 74 casos, y PCR-urgente, con 68 casos. Los 2 grupos son homogéneos en cuanto a características clínicas y analíticas. En el grupo PCR-urgente se realizaron un 18% menos de radiografías de tórax (p=0,008) e ingresaron 33 pacientes (48,5%), frente a 49 (66,2%) en el grupo PCR-convencional (p=0,042). Recibió tratamiento antibiótico el 32% en el grupo PCR-urgente frente al 67% en el PCR-convencional (p=0,000047), sin aumento significativo de las reconsultas en Urgencias ni peor evolución. Conclusiones: La PCR urgente de Bordetella es una herramienta útil en los servicios de Urgencias para el manejo de los lactantes menores de 3 meses con sospecha de tosferina, ya que puede evitar ingresos, pruebas y tratamientos antibióticos innecesarios.(AU)

Introduction: Whooping cough in patients aged under 3 months has higher rates of morbimortality. Hospitalization and treatment with azithromycin is generally recommended. Many patients with cough without other signs of alarm, are admitted and started antibiotic therapy until a result of Bordetella-PCR is available. This technique, when performed urgently, can provide the diagnosis in a few hours. The objective of this study is to determine if its generalisation in the Emergency Department allows to improve patient management. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients aged under 3 months who underwent Bordetella-PCR testing from upper respiratory tract secretions since March 2011 to December 2017. From December 2015 the test was performed urgently. Results: One hundred and fifty-eight PCR were performed, 16 (10%) were positive for B. pertussis. Negative results (142; 90%) were divided in 2 cohorts: conventional-PCR, with 74 cases, and urgent-PCR, with 68 cases. The 2 groups were homogeneous in terms of clinical and analytical characteristics. In the urgent-PCR group there was 18% reduction in chest X-rays performed (P=.008). There were 33 (48.5%) patients admitted in the urgent-PCR group, compared to 49 (66.2%) in the conventional-PCR (P=.042). Antibiotic treatment was initiated in 32% of the patients in the urgent-PCR group compared to 67% in the conventional-PCR group (P=.000047), without observing any significant increase in the number of visits to the Emergency Department or worse clinical performance. Conclusions: The introduction of urgent PCR in the Emergency Department is a useful tool in the management of infants under 3 months of age with suspected pertussis, since it can avoid unnecessary admissions, diagnostic tests and antibiotic treatments.(AU)

Urgent Bordetella PCR in infants under 3 months, a useful tool in the Pediatric Emergency Department. / PCR urgente de Bordetella en lactantes menores de 3 meses, una herramienta útil en el Servicio de Urgencias Pediátricas.

INTRODUCTION: Whooping cough in patients aged under 3 months has higher rates of morbimortality. Hospitalization and treatment with azithromycin is generally recommended. Many patients with cough without other signs of alarm, are admitted and started antibiotic therapy until a result of Bordetella-PCR is available. This technique, when performed urgently, can provide the diagnosis in a few hours. The objective of this study is to determine if its generalisation in the Emergency Department allows to improve patient management. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients aged under 3 months who underwent Bordetella-PCR testing from upper respiratory tract secretions since March 2011 to December 2017. From December 2015 the test was performed urgently. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight PCR were performed, 16 (10%) were positive for B. pertussis. Negative results (142; 90%) were divided in 2 cohorts: conventional-PCR, with 74 cases, and urgent-PCR, with 68 cases. The 2 groups were homogeneous in terms of clinical and analytical characteristics. In the urgent-PCR group there was 18% reduction in chest X-rays performed (P=.008). There were 33 (48.5%) patients admitted in the urgent-PCR group, compared to 49 (66.2%) in the conventional-PCR (P=.042). Antibiotic treatment was initiated in 32% of the patients in the urgent-PCR group compared to 67% in the conventional-PCR group (P=.000047), without observing any significant increase in the number of visits to the Emergency Department or worse clinical performance. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of urgent PCR in the Emergency Department is a useful tool in the management of infants under 3 months of age with suspected pertussis, since it can avoid unnecessary admissions, diagnostic tests and antibiotic treatments.

Impacto de la pandemia COVID-19 en urgencias: primeros hallazgos en un hospital de Madrid / Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department: Early findings from a hospital in Madrid

INTRODUCCIÓN: SARS-CoV-2, responsable de la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), fue detectado por primera vez en España el 31 de enero de 2020. El 14 de marzo fue declarado el estado de alarma con el objetivo de controlar la pandemia. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar las consecuencias de esta crisis sanitaria sobre el patrón de demanda asistencial, así como el manejo y las características de los pacientes con sospecha de COVID-19 en el Servicio de Urgencias Pediátricas. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo observacional en niños y adolescentes menores de 18 años, atendidos en nuestro Servicio de Urgencias Pediátricas durante el periodo comprendido desde el 14 de marzo hasta el 17 de abril de 2020. RESULTADOS: Durante el periodo de estudio se atendieron 1.666 pacientes, un 65,4% menos que en el mismo periodo de 2019. La edad media fue de 5,4 años y el 51,2% eran varones. El 39,9% fueron clasificados con niveles de alta prioridad, un 6,5% más que en 2019. Los principales motivos de consulta fueron fiebre (26,5%), síntomas respiratorios (16,1%) y traumatismos (15,2%). Un total de 218 pacientes (13%) fueron diagnosticados de posible COVID-19, confirmándose la infección en el 18,4%. El 44% (96/218) fueron diagnosticados de infección respiratoria inferior y el 33,9% (74/218), superior. El 23,8% (52/218) fueron hospitalizados. CONCLUSIONES: Durante el brote epidémico SARS-CoV-2 disminuyó la demanda de asistencia pediátrica urgente, aumentando la proporción de casos con niveles de triaje de alta prioridad. La mayoría de los pacientes con sospecha o confirmación microbiológica de COVID-19 cursaron con clínica respiratoria leve

INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2, coronavirus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), was first detected in Spain on 31 January 2020. On 14 March 2020, a state of emergency was declared in Spain in a bid to control the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in the country. The aim of our study is to analyse the impact on emergency medicine attendance after the national lockdown, as well as the clinical presentation and the management of patients with suspected COVID-19 in the Paediatric Emergency Department. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study included children and adolescents under the age of 18, attended in our Paediatric Emergency Department during the period March 14 to April 17, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 1,666 patients were attended during the study period, 65.4% less than in the same period of 2019. Just over half (51.2%) were males, and mean age was 5.4 years. In triage, 39.9% were high priority levels, 6.5% more than 2019. Most frequent reasons for consultation at the Paediatric Emergency Department were fever (26.5%), respiratory symptoms (16.1%), and trauma (15.2%). A total of 218 patients (13%) received a diagnosis of possible COVID-19, with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed in 18.4%, and 23.8% (52/218) were hospitalised. At discharge, 44% (96/218) were diagnosed with lower, and 33.9% (74/218) with upper respiratory infection. CONCLUSIONS: During the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, the demand for urgent paediatric care decreased, with the proportion of cases with high priority triage levels increasing. Most of the patients with suspected or microbiological confirmation of COVID-19 had mild respiratory symptoms

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department: Early findings from a hospital in Madrid.

INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2, coronavirus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), was first detected in Spain on 31 January 2020. On 14 March 2020, a state of emergency was declared in Spain in a bid to control the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in the country. The aim of our study is to analyze the impact on emergency medicine attendance after the national lockdown, as well as the clinical presentation and the management of patients with suspected COVID-19 in the Paediatric Emergency Department. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study included children and adolescents under the age of 18, attended in our Paediatric Emergency Department during the period March 14 to April 17, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 1666 patients were attended during the study period, 65.4% less than in the same period of 2019. Just over half (51.2%) were males, and mean age was 5.4 years. In triage, 39.9% were high priority levels, 6.5% more than 2019. Most frequent reasons for consultation at the Paediatric Emergency Department were fever (26.5%), respiratory symptoms (16.1%), and trauma (15.2%). A total of 218 patients (13%) received a diagnosis of possible COVID-19, with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed in 18.4%, and 23.8% (52/218) were hospitalised. At discharge, 44% (96/218) were diagnosed with lower, and 33.9% (74/218) with upper respiratory infection. CONCLUSIONS: During the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, the demand for urgent paediatric care decreased, with the proportion of cases with high priority triage levels increasing. Most of the patients with suspected or microbiological confirmation of COVID-19 had mild respiratory symptoms.

INTRODUCCIÓN: SARS-CoV-2, responsable de la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), fue detectado por primera vez en España el 31 de enero de 2020. El 14 de marzo fue declarado el estado de alarma con el objetivo de controlar la pandemia. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar las consecuencias de esta crisis sanitaria sobre el patrón de demanda asistencial, así como el manejo y las características de los pacientes con sospecha de COVID-19 en el Servicio de Urgencias Pediátricas. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo observacional en niños y adolescentes menores de 18 años, atendidos en nuestro Servicio de Urgencias Pediátricas durante el periodo comprendido desde el 14 de marzo hasta el 17 de abril de 2020. RESULTADOS: Durante el periodo de estudio se atendieron 1.666 pacientes, un 65,4% menos que en el mismo periodo de 2019. La edad media fue de 5,4 años y el 51,2% eran varones. El 39,9% fueron clasificados con niveles de alta prioridad, un 6,5% más que en 2019. Los principales motivos de consulta fueron fiebre (26,5%), síntomas respiratorios (16,1%) y traumatismos (15,2%). Un total de 218 pacientes (13%) fueron diagnosticados de posible COVID-19, confirmándose la infección en el 18,4%. El 44% (96/218) fueron diagnosticados de infección respiratoria inferior y el 33,9% (74/218), superior. El 23,8% (52/218) fueron hospitalizados. CONCLUSIONES: Durante el brote epidémico SARS-CoV-2 disminuyó la demanda de asistencia pediátrica urgente, aumentando la proporción de casos con niveles de triaje de alta prioridad. La mayoría de los pacientes con sospecha o confirmación microbiológica de COVID-19 cursaron con clínica respiratoria leve.

[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department: Early findings from a hospital in Madrid]. / Impacto de la pandemia COVID-19 en urgencias: primeros hallazgos en un hospital de Madrid.

INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2, coronavirus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), was first detected in Spain on 31 January 2020. On 14 March 2020, a state of emergency was declared in Spain in a bid to control the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in the country. The aim of our study is to analyse the impact on emergency medicine attendance after the national lockdown, as well as the clinical presentation and the management of patients with suspected COVID-19 in the Paediatric Emergency Department. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study included children and adolescents under the age of 18, attended in our Paediatric Emergency Department during the period March 14 to April 17, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 1,666 patients were attended during the study period, 65.4% less than in the same period of 2019. Just over half (51.2%) were males, and mean age was 5.4 years. In triage, 39.9% were high priority levels, 6.5% more than 2019. Most frequent reasons for consultation at the Paediatric Emergency Department were fever (26.5%), respiratory symptoms (16.1%), and trauma (15.2%). A total of 218 patients (13%) received a diagnosis of possible COVID-19, with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed in 18.4%, and 23.8% (52/218) were hospitalised. At discharge, 44% (96/218) were diagnosed with lower, and 33.9% (74/218) with upper respiratory infection. CONCLUSIONS: During the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, the demand for urgent paediatric care decreased, with the proportion of cases with high priority triage levels increasing. Most of the patients with suspected or microbiological confirmation of COVID-19 had mild respiratory symptoms.