ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The link between diabetes mellitus and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is controversial. We assessed the relationship between glycemic control (GC) and GERD in morbidly obese patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients with morbid obesity (n = 86) underwent manometry, pH-metry, endoscopy, and contrasted X-ray after responding to a GERD questionnaire and dosing fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Patients with poor GC (HbA1c, 6.1-10% and FPG < 140 mg/dl) and those with very poor GC (HbA1c > 10% or FPG > 140 mg/dl) were compared. RESULTS: There were 63 patients with poor GC and 17 with very poor GC. Compared to patients with very poor GC, patients with poor GC showed higher heartburn scores [8 (0-12) vs. 0 (0-4); P = 0.003]; higher total esophageal acid exposure [5.2% (2.5-10.5%) vs. 2.3% (0.8-7.5%); P = 0.041]; lower distal esophageal amplitude (105 ± 38 vs. 134 ± 63 mmHg; P = 0.019); higher expiratory gastroesophageal pressure gradient (GEPG, 7 ± 3.4 vs. 5.2 ± 3 mmHg; P = 0.050); lower ventilatory gradient (inspiratory-expiratory GEPG, 10.9 ± 3.8 vs. 13.6 ± 4.1 mmHg; P = 0.012); lower waist-to-hip ratio (0.95 vs. 1; P = 0.040); and more hiatal hernia (38% vs. 6%; P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests an inverse relation between glycemic control and GERD in morbidly obese patients. This can be partially explained by a lower frequency of hiatal hernia in patients with very poor glycemic control.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/metabolism , Diabetes Complications , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Adolescent , Adult , Barium , Cross-Sectional Studies , Esophageal pH Monitoring , Esophagoscopy , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/blood , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Manometry , Middle Aged , Obesity, Morbid/blood , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for GERD and a potential modulator of esophageal motility. AIM: To assess whether obese patients differ from non-obese patients in terms of esophageal motility and reflux. METHODS: Patients (n = 332) were categorized in GERD and controls after clinical assessment, esophageal manometry, and pH monitoring. Non-obese (BMI 16-29.9) and obese (BMI 30-68) were compared in regard of distal esophageal amplitude (DEA), LES pressure (LESP), manometric diagnosis, and esophageal acid exposure (EAE). RESULTS: Obese showed higher DEA in both controls (122 ± 53 vs. 97 ± 36 mmHg, p = 0.041) and GERD patients (109 ± 38 vs. 94 ± 46 mmHg, p < 0.001), higher LESP in GERD patients (20.5 ± 10.6 vs. 18.2 ± 10.6 mmHg, p = 0.049), higher frequency of nutcracker esophagus in controls (30 vs. 0%, p = 0.001), lower frequency of ineffective motility in GERD patients (6 vs. 20%, p = 0.001), and higher EAE in both controls [total EAE: 1.6% (0.7-5.1) vs. 0.9% (0.2-2.4), p = 0.027] and GERD patients [upright EAE: 6.5% (3.8-11.1) vs. 5.2% (1.5-10.6), p = 0.048]. Multiple linear regression showed that BMI was associated either with EAE (p < 0.001), DEA (p = 0.006), or LESP (in men, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients differed from non-obese in terms of esophageal motility and reflux, regardless of the presence of GERD. Obese patients showed stronger peristalsis and increased acid exposure in the esophagus.
