Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Cureus ; 12(8): e9993, 2020 Aug 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32983692

ABSTRACT

Background After surgery for degenerative cervical spine problems, most patients hope to return to non-competitive sports and other leisure activities. Limited data are available to counsel patients about return to play (RTP) in non-competitive sports after cervical surgery. Methods Participants had cervical surgery for degenerative diagnoses from April 1, 2007, to April 1, 2018. Demographic data were collected, and participants were asked to complete a survey regarding sports participation before and after cervical surgery.  Results Of the 73 participants who responded to the study, the majority (81.1%) were able to return to one or multiple hobby sports after elective spine surgery. RTP rates at 12 months for golf, tennis, and swimming were 67.6%, 31.2%, and 81.6%, respectively. Younger age and lack of preoperative motor deficit were significant predictors of return to swimming after surgery. After surgery, 54.3% of golfers reported similar or improved levels of play.  Conclusions After elective cervical spine surgery, the majority of hobby athletes can expect to return to athletics. The majority of golfers returned to play with similar or improved frequency and quality of play compared to preoperative levels. Future prospective studies will further elucidate factors predicting RTP after different types of elective cervical surgeries.

2.
World Neurosurg ; 131: e433-e440, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31376558

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Catheter-related infections are a potentially life-threatening complication of having an external ventricular drain (EVD). Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) are at increased risk of infection associated with prolonged ventricular drainage, with a reported mean infection rate of 6%. We report the EVD-associated infection rate among patients with aSAH managed with a unique standardized treatment protocol without an occlusive EVD dressing. METHODS: Patients with aSAH admitted from August 2015 through August 2017 were retrospectively analyzed for EVD placement. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were obtained twice weekly for culture and routine studies. EVD-associated infection was defined as growth of CSF cultures. RESULTS: During the 2-year study period, 122 patients presented with an aSAH, with 91 (74.6%) having EVD placement. In patients with EVDs, the mean age was 57.9 years (68% women); 88% of aSAHs were Fisher grade III or IV. Mean duration of EVD was 14 days, and 13% of patients required EVD replacement. Endovascular coiling and surgical clipping were performed in 34 (37%) and 53 (58%) patients with EVD, respectively. A total of 347 CSF studies were performed with no EVD-associated infections. There were 3 CSF samples with false-positive Gram stain results but no growth on concurrent or multiple repeat cultures. CONCLUSIONS: Using a standardized protocol for placement and management of EVDs in patients with aSAH is associated with low risk of CSF infection. Our study demonstrates that occlusive EVD dressings are not necessary and that routine CSF sampling in patients with EVD may lead to false-positive findings and unnecessary antibiotic administration.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Cerebral Ventriculitis/epidemiology , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/surgery , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Ventriculostomy/methods , Adult , Aged , Bandages , Catheter-Related Infections/cerebrospinal fluid , Cerebral Ventriculitis/cerebrospinal fluid , Clinical Protocols , Drainage/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/cerebrospinal fluid
3.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 44(12): 848-854, 2019 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30830045

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiology of cervical spine injuries in collegiate football players. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The incidence and etiology of cervical spine injuries in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) football players has not been well defined in recent years. METHODS: The incidence and characteristics of cervical spine injuries were identified utilizing the NCAA-ISP database. Rates of injury were calculated as the number of injuries divided by the total number of athlete-exposures (AEs). AEs were defined as any student participation in one NCAA-sanctioned practice or competition. RESULTS: An estimated 7496 cervical spine injuries were identified. Of these, 85.6% were categorized as new injuries. These occurred at a rate of 2.91 per 10000 AEs. Stingers were most common (1.87 per 10000 AEs) followed by cervical strains (0.80 per 10000 AEs). Injuries were nine times more likely to occur during competition when compared with practice settings. When compared with the regular season, the relative risks of sustaining a cervical spine injury during the preseason and postseason were 0.69 (95% CI 0.52-0.90) and 0.39 (95% CI 0.16-0.94), respectively. The rate of cervical spine injuries was highest in Division I athletes. Direct contact-related injuries were most common, representing 90.8% of all injuries sustained. Injuries were most common in linebackers (20.3%) followed secondarily by defensive linemen (18.2%). Most players returned to play within 24 hours of the initial injury (64.4%), while only 2.8% remained out of play for > 21 days. CONCLUSION: Fortunately, the rate of significant and disabling cervical spine injuries appears to be low in the NCAA football athlete. The promotion of safer tackling techniques, appropriate modification of protective gear, and preventive rehabilitation in these aforementioned settings is of continued value. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Football/injuries , Football/trends , Neck Injuries/epidemiology , Students , Universities/trends , Adolescent , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Databases, Factual/trends , Humans , Incidence , Male , Neck Injuries/diagnosis , Prospective Studies , Seasons , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 44(14): E857-E864, 2019 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30817732

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a large administrative database. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study are to: 1) identify the incidence and cause of 90-day readmissions following primary elective lumbar spine surgery, 2) offer insight into potential risk factors that contribute to these readmissions, and 3) quantify the cost associated with these readmissions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: As bundled-payment models for the reimbursement of surgical services become more popular in spine, the focus is shifting toward long-term patient outcomes in the context of 90-day episodes of care. With limited data available on national 90-day readmission statistics available, we hope to provide evidence that will aid in the development of more cost-effective perioperative care models. METHODS: Using ICD-9 coding, we identified all patients 18 years of age and older in the 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) who underwent an elective, inpatient, primary lumbar spine surgery. Using multivariate logistic regression, we identified independent predictors of 90-day readmission while controlling for a multitude of confounding variables and completed a comparative cost analysis. RESULTS: We identified 169,788 patients who underwent a primary lumbar spine procedure. In total 4268 (2.5%) were readmitted within 90 days. There was no difference in comorbidity burden between cohorts (readmitted vs. not readmitted) as quantified by the Elixhauser Comorbidity index. Independent predictors of increased odds of 90-day readmission were: anemia, uncomplicated diabetes and diabetes with chronic complications, surgical wound disruption and acute myocardial infarction at the time of the index admission, self-pay status, and an anterior surgical approach. Implant complications were identified as the primary related cause of readmission. These readmissions were associated with a significant cost increase. CONCLUSION: There are clearly identifiable risk factors that increase the odds of hospital readmission within 90 days of primary lumbar spine surgery. An overall 90-day readmission rate of 2.5%, while relatively low, carries significantly increased cost to both the patient and hospital. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Subject(s)
Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Inpatients , Logistic Models , Lumbosacral Region/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Readmission/economics , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...