A Multicenter Study Evaluating the Risk Factors and Outcomes of Repeat Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK), currently the most common procedure for managing corneal endothelial dysfunction, may be repeated following DSEK failure from a variety of causes. This multicenter study reports the risk factors and outcomes of repeat DSEK. METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved multicenter retrospective chart review of patients who underwent repeat DSEK. Twelve surgeons from 5 Midwest academic centers and 3 private practice groups participated. The Eversight Eye Bank provided clinical indication and donor graft data. We also assessed the role of the learning curve by comparing cohorts from the first and second 5-year periods. RESULTS: A total of 121 eyes from 121 patients who underwent repeat DSEK were identified. The average age of the patients was 70 ± 12 years. The most common indication for repeat DSEK was late endothelial graft failure without rejection (58%, N = 63). Average preoperative and 12-month postoperative repeat DSEK corrected distance visual acuities were 20/694 and 20/89, respectively. Visual acuity outcomes, endothelial cell density, and cell loss did not significantly vary between the 2 cohorts. Initial graft rebubble rates for the first and second cohorts were 51% and 25%. The presence of glaucoma, prior glaucoma surgery, or a history of penetrating (full thickness) keratoplasty did not significantly affect visual outcomes. The median, mean, and range of intraocular pressures before repeat DSEK were 15.0, 15.7, and 6 to 37 mm Hg, respectively. Patients with higher intraocular pressures before repeat DSEK had improved postoperative corrected distance visual acuities. CONCLUSIONS: Repeating DSEK improves vision following failed or decompensated DSEK surgery. Higher preoperative repeat DSEK IOPs were associated with improved visual outcomes, and initial graft rebubble rates, which decreased over time, were likely due to surgeon experience.

Clostridium perfringens endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty with contaminated corneal allografts: a case series.

PURPOSE: To report the postoperative clinical course of 3 patients who underwent corneal transplantation with corneal allografts contaminated with Clostridium perfringens and to evaluate the risk factors for anaerobic contamination in 2 donors. METHODS: Patient records and adverse reaction reports from a single eye bank related to cases of posttransplant C. perfringens endophthalmitis were reviewed. Records regarding the mated corneas, donor autopsy reports, and other pertinent data were also reviewed. RESULTS: Three adverse reactions associated with transplantation of corneal allografts contaminated with C. perfringens were reported. Two cases were from mated corneas. Both patients developed fulminant endophthalmitis after undergoing uncomplicated penetrating keratoplasty and required subsequent enucleation. Another isolated case (with no adverse reaction in the mate cornea) developed hypopyon postoperatively that resolved with intravitreal and topical antibiotics. Possible risk factors for anaerobic tissue contamination in the donors included illicit drug use in the first donor and exposure to sewage at the time of death in the second donor. CONCLUSIONS: Clostridial endophthalmitis is an aggressive rapidly progressive infection with potentially poor visual outcomes that can be transmitted from infected corneal allografts. Further investigation is needed to clarify the role of anaerobic donor rim cultures and the donor risk factors associated with recovering corneal allograft tissue contaminated with C. perfringens.

Ocular adnexal MALTomas: case series of patients treated with primary radiation.

BACKGROUND: Ocular adnexal mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas (MALTomas) are rare, and there are no phase III trials to guide treatment. Primary radiation therapy has been the typical management. This retrospective series reports the experience of a single institution and adds to the current literature. METHODS: Our electronic medical record system and available paper charts were used to identify patients with MALTomas of the lacrimal gland or sac, conjunctiva, and orbital structures, including extraocular muscles. In order to determine pathology, staging, treatment information, local and distant control, salvage treatments, and late toxicity, records were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with ocular adnexal MALTomas had local radiation between 1992 and 2011 for primary or recurrent disease. Fifty percent of patients had lymphoma in the conjunctiva, 25% had lymphoma in the lacrimal sac/gland, and 25% of patients had lymphoma in the posterior orbit. Stage IAE disease occurred in 75% of patients, 6% had stage IIAE disease, and 19% of patients had a positive bone marrow biopsy. One patient received chemotherapy as part of initial therapy. The median radiation dose was 30 Gy (25.5-36 Gy) delivered with electrons (31%) or photons (69%). After a mean follow-up of 62.8 months, 2 patients had residual/progressive disease, 2 had contralateral recurrence, and 1 patient had a distant failure, for local control of 87.5% and overall disease control of 68.75%. Recurrence/progression occurred at a median of 35.45 months. Two patients with residual/progressive disease and 1 patient with a contralateral recurrence were followed, successfully salvaged, and have no evidence of disease. Fourteen patients are still alive, and there were no disease-related/toxicity deaths. Seven patients developed cataracts in the treated eye, 2 patients had radiation retinopathy, 2 had permanent dry eye syndrome, and 1 patient had severe keratopathy requiring enucleation. Six patients (3.75%) had worsening visual acuity of unclear etiology. CONCLUSIONS: Primary radiation therapy for ocular adnexal MALTomas with a median dose of 30 Gy led to excellent local control. Patients who did recur were successfully salvaged. Radiation was generally well tolerated, with expected cataractogenesis, given the dose required to achieve local control (with only 1 patient developing severe keratopathy after receiving the highest dose in this series).

Approaches to corneal astigmatism in cataract surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To outline current options for managing astigmatism during cataract surgery and update readers on new techniques for improving the final refractive outcome in these patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies continue to show the effectiveness of peripheral corneal relaxing incisions (PCRIs) for correcting astigmatism in combination with monofocal, multifocal, and toric intraocular lens (IOL) implants. The options in toric IOLs are expanding. Intraoperative aberrometry is a new tool that can improve the accuracy of PCRIs and toric IOLs. SUMMARY: PCRIs and toric IOLs are currently the two main options for astigmatism management during cataract surgery. Refractive outcomes are improved by new techniques, which refine the effectiveness and accuracy of these two options.

Retrospective review of graft dislocation rate associated with descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty after primary failed penetrating keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To report the rate of graft dislocation in patients who underwent Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) after a previous penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). METHODS: Institutional review board-approved, multicenter, retrospective chart review. Inclusion criteria included: prior failed PKP and subsequent DSAEK. The primary outcomes measured in this study were the presence of a graft dislocation, rate of rebubble, and graft attachment. Additional variables included: presence of a prior glaucoma drainage device, graft-to-host size disparity, number of sutures remaining in PKP, and stripping of the Descemet membrane at the time of DSAEK surgery. RESULTS: Ninety patients (97 eyes) were included in the study. In 31% (30 of 97), the endothelial graft dislocated after surgery. All 30 cases required a rebubble except 1, which reattached spontaneously. Ninety-eight percent (95 of 97) of all grafts remained attached for the duration of the follow-up period. Only 2 eyes (2.2%) required repeat graft. Endothelial grafts dislocated in 67% of patients with glaucoma draining devices. The dislocation rate for grafts larger than the host was 12 of 49 (24%), equal to the host was 3 of 17 (18%), and smaller than the host was 8 of 19 (42%). Dislocations occurred in 5 of 21 (24%) of grafts with sutures remaining and 22 of 76 (29%) of those with all sutures out. Five of 12 (42%) cases of grafts performed without stripping the Descemet had dislocations. CONCLUSIONS: The graft dislocation rate in DSAEK procedures after PKP is comparable to that after primary DSAEK cases. Donor grafts that are smaller than the host PKP and the presence of prior glaucoma drainage devices are risk factors for higher rates of graft dislocation.

External refinement of the donor lenticule position during descemet's stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty.

The authors describe a technique to facilitate the centration of the donor lenticule during Descemet's stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty. The donor corneal lenticule is unfolded and grossly centered in the anterior chamber using a barbed 30-gauge needle on a 3-cc air syringe or a reverse Sinsky hook. Fine adjustments to center the lenticule can be achieved by applying external pressure to the cornea with a laser in-situ keratomileusis flap roller. This simple technique provides a mechanism for simultaneously removing interface fluid and allows the surgeon to center the donor corneal lenticule without further risk of direct mechanical trauma to the donor endothelium.

Results of resident-performed laser in situ keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: To analyze the results of resident-performed laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Rush University Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Chicago, Illinois, USA. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 44 consecutive eyes of 22 patients who had LASIK performed from August 2000 through February 2002. Based on preoperative spherical equivalent, the eyes were divided into a low myopia group (A) (-1.0 to -6.0 diopter [D]) and a higher myopia group (B) (> -6.01 D). Preoperative and postoperative spherical equivalent (SE), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) were measured and analyzed within each group. Patients had at least 2 follow-up visits, with the second visit occurring between 1 and 9 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the mean SE in Group A was -3.93 D +/- 1.53 (SD) and in Group B, -8.49 +/- 1.70 D. At the final visit, the SE in Group A decreased to -0.29 +/- 0.55 D and in Group B, -1.09 +/- 0.87 D. The UCVA in Group A at the final visit was 20/20 or better in 43% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 100% of eyes. In Group B, the UCVA was 20/20 or better in 31% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 75% of eyes. In all eyes, the BCVA improved by 1 line in 16% or remained the same in 84%. No eyes lost any lines of BCVA. The SE taken at the last visit was within +/-0.5 D in 69% of all eyes and within +/-1.0 D in 82% of all eyes. The incidence of patients needing retreatment in resident-performed LASIK surgery was 3 of 44 (6.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis performed by residents is a safe and effective procedure for correction of refractive error. Postoperative UCVA, refractive error, retreatment rate, and loss of BCVA were consistent with published results from nonresident surgeons. These results also exceeded the U.S. Food and Drug Administration requirements for LASIK surgery.

Infectious keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis: results of an ASCRS survey.

To investigate the incidence, culture results, treatment, and visual outcomes of infectious keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) worldwide, the Cornea Clinical Committee of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) contacted 8600 United States and international ASCRS members by e-mail and asked them to respond to a questionnaire about post-LASIK infectious keratitis. One hundred sixteen infections were reported by 56 LASIK surgeons who had performed an estimated 338 550 procedures. Seventy-six cases presented in the first week after surgery, 7 during the second week, 17 between the second and fourth weeks, and 16 after 1 month. Forty-seven cases were not diagnosed on initial presentation. The most common organisms cultured were atypical mycobacteria and staphylococci. Empiric therapy is not recommended as most of the organisms are opportunistic and not responsive to conventional therapy. Flap elevation and culturing should be performed when post-LASIK infectious keratitis is suspected.