Animal-to-Human Dose Translation of ANTHRASIL for Treatment of Inhalational Anthrax in Healthy Adults, Obese Adults, and Pediatric Subjects.

Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous (AIGIV [ANTHRASIL]), was developed for the treatment of toxemia associated with inhalational anthrax. It is a plasma product collected from individuals vaccinated with anthrax vaccine and contains antitoxin IgG antibodies against Bacillus anthracis protective antigen. A pharmacokinetic (PK) and exposure-response model was constructed to assess the PKs of AIGIV in anthrax-free and anthrax-exposed rabbits, non-human primates and anthrax-free humans, as well as the relationship between AIGIV exposure and survival from anthrax, based on available preclinical/clinical studies. The potential effect of anthrax on the PKs of AIGIV was evaluated and estimates of survival odds following administration of AIGIV protective doses with and without antibiotic co-treatment were established. As the developed PK model can simulate exposure of AIGIV in any species for any dosing scenario, the relationship between the predicted area under the concentration curve of AIGIV in humans and the probability of survival observed in preclinical studies was explored. Based on the simulation results, the intravenous administration of 420 U (units of potency as measured by validated Toxin Neutralization Assay) of AIGIV is expected to result in a > 80% probability of survival in more than 90% of the human population. Additional simulations suggest that exposure levels were similar in healthy and obese humans, and exposure in pediatrics is expected to be up to approximately seven-fold higher than in healthy adults, allowing for doses in pediatric populations that ranged from one to seven vials. Overall, the optimal human dose was justified based on the PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of AIGIV in animals and model-based translation of PK/PD to predict human exposure and efficacy.

Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analysis of eptinezumab in the treatment of episodic and chronic migraine.

Eptinezumab is a humanized mAb that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide and is under regulatory review for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine (EM, CM). It is important to determine whether exposures achieved with intravenous (IV) administration of eptinezumab achieve desired pharmacologic effects. Population pharmacokinetics, including dose- and exposure-response analyses, were performed using patient-level data from the eptinezumab clinical trial program with IV doses ranging from 10 to 1000 mg in pharmacokinetic analyses or 10 to 300 mg in phase 2/3 clinical studies in patients with EM or CM. Exposure-response analysis explored the relationship between eptinezumab exposure metrics and efficacy parameters including monthly migraine days. The pharmacokinetic profile of eptinezumab was characterized by rapid attainment of maximum plasma concentration (ie, end of IV administration) and a terminal half-life of 27 days. Covariate analysis found that patient characteristics had no clinically significant effects on pharmacokinetic parameters and were insufficient to influence dosing. Dose- and exposure-response analyses found exposure with single doses ≥100 mg was associated with greater efficacy compared with doses ≤30 mg and a plateau of effect between 100 and 300 mg. A saturable inhibitory Emax model found the exposure over 12 weeks produced by single-dose eptinezumab 100 and 300 mg exceeded the exposure estimates required to achieve 90% of the maximal efficacy (EC90 ). This pharmacokinetic analysis of eptinezumab supports dosing every 12 weeks with no adjustment for patient characteristics, including exposures associated with 100- or 300-mg doses producing optimal efficacy effects. The similar efficacy profiles support 100 mg as the lowest effective dose of eptinezumab.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of neratinib during co-administration with loperamide in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of multiple doses of loperamide on the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single oral dose of neratinib. METHODS: This was an open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence study. Twenty healthy adult subjects received an oral dose of neratinib 240 mg daily on Days 1-4 of Period 1 followed by a 7-day washout. In Period 2, oral neratinib 240 mg was administered with loperamide 4 mg followed by two further doses of loperamide 2 mg 8 and 16 h later on Days 1-4. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed for 72 h following each neratinib dose. Safety was monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: A median tmax of ~ 6 h was observed for neratinib during both periods. Apparent clearance and volume of distribution were similar for Periods 1 and 2: mean CLss/F 308.2 and 322.1 L/h; mean Vzτ/F 7995 and 10,318 L, respectively. The half-life of neratinib increased in the presence of loperamide from 18.0 to 22.2 h. Mean exposure was within the same range without and with loperamide administration: Cmax 61.2 ng/mL and 49.5 ng/mL; AUClast 1086 ng h/mL and 1153 ng h/mL, and AUCtau 779 ng h/mL and 745 ng h/mL, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mainly mild in intensity, with the most frequent events being diarrhea (45%) and constipation (35%). CONCLUSIONS: Neratinib administered alone and concomitantly with multiple oral doses of loperamide is generally safe and well tolerated. Loperamide has minimal effects on neratinib pharmacokinetic parameters.

Onartuzumab with or without bevacizumab in combination with weekly paclitaxel does not prolong QTc or adversely affect other ECG parameters in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The potential effect of onartuzumab, when administered with or without bevacizumab in combination with weekly paclitaxel, on the corrected QT interval (QTc) and other electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters, was investigated in a randomized, phase 2 study OAM4861g of first- or second-line therapy in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. METHODS: Triplicate 12-lead ECGs were recorded at screening, pre- and post-dose on day 1 of cycles 1, 2, and 4, and at the study drug discontinuation visit (SDDV). Onartuzumab serum samples were collected pre- and post-dose on day 1 of cycles 1-4 and at the SDDV. Fridericia's correction was applied to QT recordings (QTcF), and change from baseline (ΔQTcF) was calculated. Post-baseline measurements were reported as baseline-adjusted control arm (placebo plus bevacizumab plus paclitaxel)-corrected values (ΔΔQTcF). Categorical ECG findings were noted. Linear mixed effects modeling evaluated a potential concentration-ΔQTcF relationship. RESULTS: Out of 185 enrolled patients, 165 patients had ECG-evaluable data for analyses. Similar ΔQTcF and ΔΔQTcF values were observed across all treatment arms, with mean increase <10 and <7 ms, respectively, across all time points. Similar changes in heart rate, PR interval, and QRS duration were noted across all treatment arms. Incidences of abnormal ECG findings of clinical interest were comparable in the onartuzumab-containing arms and the control arm. No concentration-ΔQTcF relationship was evident at onartuzumab serum concentrations up to 1,200 µg/ml. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that onartuzumab, at the dose and exposures studied in this clinical trial, does not meaningfully affect the QTcF interval.

Pharmacokinetics of amlodipine and olmesartan after administration of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil in separate dosage forms and as a fixed-dose combination.

The pharmacokinetics of amlodipine and olmesartan in healthy volunteers after coadministration of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil concomitantly as separate dosage forms and together in a fixed-dose combination tablet were characterized in 5 phase I, randomized, crossover studies. The mean steady-state pharmacokinetics of amlodipine and olmesartan were similar when olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/day and amlodipine 10 mg/day were administered separately or concomitantly for 10 days. The total and maximum exposure to amlodipine and olmesartan after administration of fixed-dose combination amlodipine/olmesartan medoxomil 10 mg/40 mg was bioequivalent to amlodipine 10 mg plus olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg. The ratio of least squares mean and 90% confidence intervals for the area under the drug concentration-time curve from time zero to time t, from time zero to infinity, and the maximum observed plasma drug concentration of amlodipine and olmesartan fell within the prespecified range for bioequivalence (80.0% - 125.0%). The area under the drug concentration-time curve from time zero to time t, from time zero to infinity, and the maximum observed plasma drug concentration of both drugs also met the prespecified criterion for bioequivalence when the fixed-dose combination tablet was taken 30 minutes after a high-fat breakfast. Total exposure to amlodipine and olmesartan was dose-proportional after administration of olmesartan medoxomil 10 mg to 40 mg in the fixed-dose combination formulation with amlodipine 5 mg to 10 mg. From a pharmacokinetic perspective, the 2 drugs are well suited to coadministration in a fixed-dose combination.