De-escalating axillary management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: The ratio of positive sentinel lymph nodes matters.

BACKGROUND: De-escalation of axillary surgery in breast cancer (BC) patients diminishes sequelae without compromising cancer outcomes. Surgical management of the axilla is challenging after neoadjuvant treatment. We aimed to identify the factors associated with residual axillary disease amenable to lymphadenectomy in patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study in Hospital 12 de Octubre (Spain). We included BC patients with positive SLNB who underwent axillary dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were performed to identify independent predictors of residual axillary disease. We estimated the ratio of positive nodes in SLNB and assessed the diagnostic validity of this ratio in relation to residual axillary disease. RESULTS: We included 103 patients in the study. Residual axillary disease was identified in 54 patients (52.4%). Clinically node positive status at diagnosis (OR = 18.3, 95%CI: 4.0-83.6) and a ratio of positive nodes in SLNB ≥0.5 (OR = 6.5, 95%CI 41.7-23.7) were associated with residual axillary disease. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of a ratio of positive nodes in SLNB ≥0.5 were 87% (95%CI 75.1%-94.6%) and 75% (95%CI 55.1%-89.3%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, for patients with positive SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, stage N+ at diagnosis and a ratio of positive nodes in SLNB ≥0.5 were independent risk factors of positive residual axillary disease. This ratio is a feasible measure with a good diagnostic validity for residual axillary disease and could be used as a guiding factor in the surgical management of these patients.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in ADAM17, IL23R and SLCO1C1 genes protect against infliximab failure in adults with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: To predict primary failure of infliximab (IFX) therapy in Crohn's disease (CD) and to identify patients who maintain long-term effectiveness to IFX is currently not feasible. Some genetic variations are proposed as potential biomarkers. AIM: We assessed a set of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes related to the IFX mechanism of action and the presence of HLA-DQA1 * 05 allele on the primary response and long-term durability in CD patients. METHODS: A multi-centre cross-sectional study of IFX-exposed adult patients with CD was undertaken. Treatment persistence and time to failure were co-primary endpoints. DNA from the 131 patients was genotyped. Association between SNPs and clinical variables with IFX persistence was assessed. RESULTS: Failure to IFX was documented in 65 (49.6%) out of 131 patients. IFX persistence was associated either with carrying the TT genotype in ADAM17 rs10929587 (ORa=0.2; 95%CI=0.1-0.8; p = 0.021), or the CC genotype in SLCO1C1 rs3794271 (ORa=0.2; 95%CI=0.1-0.7; p = 0.008), according to multivariate logistic regression. In contrast, previous bowel resection increased the risk of IFX failure (ORa=2.8; 95%CI=1.1-7.3; p = 0.025). Cox regression analysis confirmed these findings and also identified IL23R rs10489629-TT (HRa 0.41; 95%CI=0.22-0.75; p = 0.004) and concomitant immunosuppressants (HRa 0.46; 95%CI=0.27-0.77; p = 0.003) as protection from IFX failure. However, no association between HLA-DQA1 * 05 allele and persistence of IFX therapy was found, with similar failure rates among carriers and non-carriers (52.8% vs. 47.4%, respectively; p = 0.544). CONCLUSIONS: SNPs rs10929587-TT in ADAM17, rs10489629-TT in IL23R and rs3794271-CC in SLCO1C1, together with no previous bowel surgery and concomitant immunosuppression, were identified as protection from failure to IFX.

Clinical landscape of LAG-3-targeted therapy.

Lymphocyte-activated gene 3 (LAG-3) is a cell surface inhibitory receptor and a key regulator of immune homeostasis with multiple biological activities related to T-cell functions. LAG-3 is considered a next-generation immune checkpoint of clinical importance, right next to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4). Indeed, it is the third inhibitory receptor to be exploited in human anticancer immunotherapies. Several LAG-3-antagonistic immunotherapies are being evaluated at various stages of preclinical and clinical development. In addition, combination therapies blocking LAG-3 together with other immune checkpoints are also being evaluated at preclinical and clinical levels. Indeed, the co-blockade of LAG-3 with PD-1 is demonstrating encouraging results. A new generation of bispecific PD-1/LAG-3-blocking agents have also shown strong capacities to specifically target PD-1+ LAG-3+ highly dysfunctional T cells and enhance their proliferation and effector activities. Here we identify and classify preclinical and clinical trials conducted involving LAG-3 as a target through an extensive bibliographic research. The current understanding of LAG-3 clinical applications is summarized, and most of the publically available data up to date regarding LAG-3-targeted therapy preclinical and clinical research and development are reviewed and discussed.

Eficacia y seguridad de la inyección de onabotulinumtoxin A en pacientes varones con hiperactividad del detrusor tras la cirugía para incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo / Efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxin A injection in male patients with detrusor overactivity after stress urinary incontinence surgery

Introducción y objetivo El uso de la inyección de onabotulinumtoxin A (BoNT-A) en pacientes masculinos con hiperactividad del detrusor (HD) tras la cirugía para la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo (IUE) ha sido escasamente descrito. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar los resultados de este tratamiento en esta población específica.Materiales y métodosAnálisis retrospectivo desde 2010 en pacientes varones que reciben una primera inyección de 100U de BoNT-A para el tratamiento de HD tras someterse a una cirugía previa para la IUE en nuestro departamento. La respuesta al tratamiento se valoró mediante la Escala de Beneficio del Tratamiento: 1) mejoría significativa; 2) mejoría; 3) sin cambios; 4) empeoramiento tras el tratamiento (Escala de Beneficio del Tratamiento 1 o 2: respuesta al tratamiento). Las complicaciones se catalogaron según la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo. Se consideró la continuación del tratamiento si los pacientes habían recibido una inyección de BoNT-A durante los 12 meses previos a la última revisión. Se compararon las variables urodinámicas antes y después del tratamiento.Resultados Se incluyeron 18 pacientes, con una edad mediana de 71,1 (59,1-83,5) años. Doce (66,7%) pacientes refirieron respuesta al tratamiento. Se detectaron 2 (11,1%) complicaciones: retención urinaria que requirió cateterismo intermitente limpio (Clavien-Dindo 2). No se detectaron complicaciones relacionadas con la cirugía previa para la IUE. Quince (83,3%) pacientes recibieron un seguimiento>12 meses (mediana de seguimiento 57 [15-89] meses) y todos habían suspendido el tratamiento al final del seguimiento. Se observó una mejoría significativa en la presencia de HD y en la acomodación vesical en el estudio urodinámico.ConclusiónAunque la mayoría de los hombres con HD después de la cirugía de IUE responden a la inyección intradetrusor de BoNT-A, todos interrumpen el tratamiento por motivos personales. Se trata de un procedimiento seguro, cuya

Introduction and objective The use of onabotulinumtoxin A (BoNT-A) injection in male patients with detrusor overactivity (DO) after stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery has been scarcely described. Our aim was to assess results of this treatment in this specific population.Materials and methods Retrospective analysis of men with previous SUI surgery who had been treated with a first injection of 100U BoNT-A because of DO since 2010 in our department. Treatment response was assessed with the Treatment Benefit Scale: 1) greatly improved; 2) improved; 3) not changed; 4) worsened after treatment (Treatment Benefit Scale 1 or 2: treatment response). Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Treatment continuation was considered present if, at the last visit, patients had received a BoNT-A injection within the preceding 12 months. Pre- and post-treatment urodynamic variables were compared.Results Eighteen patients were included, median age 71.1 (59.1-83.5) years. Twelve (66.7%) patients reported response to treatment. Two (11.1%) complications were detected: urinary retention requiring clean intermittent catheterization (Clavien-Dindo 2). No complications related to previous SUI surgery were detected. Fifteen (83.3%) patients had a follow-up>12 months (median follow-up 57 [15-89] months) and all of them had discontinued treatment at the end of follow-up. Urodynamic studies showed significant improvement in terms of DO and bladder compliance.Conclusion Although most men with DO after SUI surgery respond to intradetrusor BoNT-A injection, all of them discontinue treatment due to personal reasons. It is a safe procedure, with urinary retention requiring clean intermittent catheterization being the most frequent complication (AU)

Efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxin A injection in male patients with detrusor overactivity after stress urinary incontinence surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The use of onabotulinumtoxin A (BoNT-A) injection in male patients with detrusor overactivity (DO) after stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery has been scarcely described. Our aim was to assess results of this treatment in this specific population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of men with previous SUI surgery who had been treated with a first injection of 100 U BoNT-A because of DO since 2010 in our department. Treatment response was assessed with the Treatment Benefit Scale: 1) greatly improved; 2) improved; 3) not changed; 4) worsened after treatment (Treatment Benefit Scale 1 or 2: treatment response). Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Treatment continuation was considered present if, at the last visit, patients had received a BoNT-A injection within the preceding 12 months. Pre- and post-treatment urodynamic variables were compared. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included, median age 71.1 (59.1-83.5) years. Twelve (66.7%) patients reported response to treatment. Two (11.1%) complications were detected: urinary retention requiring clean intermittent catheterization (Clavien-Dindo 2). No complications related to previous SUI surgery were detected. Fifteen (83.3%) patients had a follow-up >12 months (median follow-up 57 [15-89] months) and all of them had discontinued treatment at the end of follow-up. Urodynamic studies showed significant improvement in terms of DO and bladder compliance. CONCLUSION: Although most men with DO after SUI surgery respond to intradetrusor BoNT-A injection, all of them discontinue treatment due to personal reasons. It is a safe procedure, with urinary retention requiring clean intermittent catheterization being the most frequent complication.

Percepción de la validez del cuestionario Migraine Disability Assessment por una población de pacientes con migraña crónica / Perception of the validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire in a population of patients with chronic migraine

Objetivos: El cuestionario Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) es el instrumento más empleado para valorar el grado de discapacidad en los estudios de migraña. El objetivo del estudio es determinar el nivel de cumplimentación del cuestionario, valorar su facilidad de uso y conocer la percepción subjetiva del paciente sobre la capacidad del cuestionario para medir realmente su discapacidad.Material y métodosEstudio prospectivo sobre una población de 78 pacientes con migraña crónica. Se determina el nivel educativo y la situación laboral. En la visita basal se adiestra a los pacientes sobre la correcta cumplimentación del cuestionario. A los 3 meses se determina la puntuación total y el nivel de cumplimentación. Además los pacientes contestan una encuesta que mide: facilidad de uso y percepción del paciente sobre si la escala refleja su propia discapacidad.ResultadosSolo el 46% rellena completamente el cuestionario. El 69% de los pacientes indica que el cuestionario no les resulta fácil de cumplimentar (resultado no influido por el nivel educativo, pero sí por la situación laboral de los pacientes). El 62% de los encuestados opina que el cuestionario no refleja completamente su propia percepción de discapacidad.ConclusionesAunque está más que demostrada la validez y consistencia del cuestionario MIDAS, un porcentaje elevado de nuestra población reconoce que el cuestionario no es fácil de rellenar y además es percibido por muchos de nuestros pacientes como un cuestionario que no refleja adecuadamente su discapacidad. Conocer la opinión de los pacientes sobre la idoneidad de los cuestionarios administrados en las consultas es crucial para mejorar su cumplimentación. (AU)

Objectives: The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire is the most frequently used instrument for assessing the level of disability in studies into migraine. This study aims to determine the level of completion of the questionnaire, assess the ease of use, and understand patients’ subjective perception of the questionnaire's actual ability to measure disability.Material and methodsWe performed a prospective study of a sample of 78 patients with chronic migraine, determining their level of education and employment status. In a baseline visit, patients were trained to properly complete the questionnaire. At 3 months, we determined the total score and level of completion. Patients also completed a survey measuring ease of use of the questionnaire and patients’ perception of whether the score accurately reflected their disability.ResultsOnly 46% of patients fully completed the questionnaire. Sixty-nine percent reported finding it difficult to complete (this was influenced by patient's employment status but not by educational level). Sixty-two percent of respondents believed that the questionnaire did not fully reflect their own perception of their disability.ConclusionsAlthough the validity and consistence of the MIDAS questionnaire are well documented, a high percentage of the study population reported finding it difficult to complete; many patients also considered that the questionnaire did not accurately reflect their disability. Understanding patients’ opinions of the suitability of questionnaires used in consultation is crucial to improving completion. (AU)

Perception of the validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire in a population of patients with chronic migraine.

OBJECTIVES: The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire is the most frequently used instrument for assessing the level of disability in studies into migraine. This study aims to determine the level of completion of the questionnaire, assess the ease of use, and understand patients' subjective perception of the questionnaire's actual ability to measure disability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study of a sample of 78 patients with chronic migraine, determining their level of education and employment status. In a baseline visit, patients were trained to properly complete the questionnaire. At 3 months, we determined the total score and level of completion. Patients also completed a survey measuring ease of use of the questionnaire and patients' perception of whether the score accurately reflected their disability. RESULTS: Only 46% of patients fully completed the questionnaire. Sixty-nine percent reported finding it difficult to complete (this was influenced by patient's employment status but not by educational level). Sixty-two percent of respondents believed that the questionnaire did not fully reflect their own perception of their disability. CONCLUSIONS: Although the validity and consistence of the MIDAS questionnaire are well documented, a high percentage of the study population reported finding it difficult to complete; many patients also considered that the questionnaire did not accurately reflect their disability. Understanding patients' opinions of the suitability of questionnaires used in consultation is crucial to improving completion.

Efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxin A injection in male patients with detrusor overactivity after stress urinary incontinence surgery. / Eficacia y seguridad de la inyección de onabotulinumtoxin A en pacientes varones con hiperactividad del detrusor tras la cirugía para incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The use of onabotulinumtoxin A (BoNT-A) injection in male patients with detrusor overactivity (DO) after stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery has been scarcely described. Our aim was to assess results of this treatment in this specific population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of men with previous SUI surgery who had been treated with a first injection of 100U BoNT-A because of DO since 2010 in our department. Treatment response was assessed with the Treatment Benefit Scale: 1) greatly improved; 2) improved; 3) not changed; 4) worsened after treatment (Treatment Benefit Scale 1 or 2: treatment response). Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Treatment continuation was considered present if, at the last visit, patients had received a BoNT-A injection within the preceding 12 months. Pre- and post-treatment urodynamic variables were compared. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included, median age 71.1 (59.1-83.5) years. Twelve (66.7%) patients reported response to treatment. Two (11.1%) complications were detected: urinary retention requiring clean intermittent catheterization (Clavien-Dindo 2). No complications related to previous SUI surgery were detected. Fifteen (83.3%) patients had a follow-up>12 months (median follow-up 57 [15-89] months) and all of them had discontinued treatment at the end of follow-up. Urodynamic studies showed significant improvement in terms of DO and bladder compliance. CONCLUSION: Although most men with DO after SUI surgery respond to intradetrusor BoNT-A injection, all of them discontinue treatment due to personal reasons. It is a safe procedure, with urinary retention requiring clean intermittent catheterization being the most frequent complication.

Úlcera duodenal benigna con penetración en cabeza de páncreas, con obstrucción de la vía biliar / Benign duodenal ulcer penetrating into pancreas, with obstruction of common bile duct

Resumen Objetivo: Reportamos un caso clínico con presentación atípica de una úlcera duodenal benigna que simula el cuadro clínico y radiológico de una neoplasia de páncreas. Materiales y Método: Presentamos el caso de un varón de 83 años que debuta con un cuadro clínico de astenia e ictericia mucocutánea. En estudio de imagen se identifica una masa en cabeza pancreática. En estudio endoscópico se observa úlcera duodenal benigna penetrada a cabeza de páncreas que condiciona obstrucción de vía biliar. Discusión y Conclusiones: El manejo de estos pacientes suele ser quirúrgico porque desarrollan un deterioro asociado a sepsis o perforación. Si la situación clínica lo permite se puede intentar un tratamiento conservador. En nuestro caso el paciente precisó un mes de hospitalización con antibioticoterapia intravenosa de amplio espectro, reposo alimentario, nutrición parenteral y tratamiento con inhibidores de la bomba de protones (IBP) para la resolución del cuadro. La penetración o fistulización a la cabeza del páncreas es una complicación grave e infrecuente de la enfermedad ulcerosa péptica. Su manejo puede ser conservador en casos seleccionados donde no exista perforación de la úlcera a la cavidad peritoneal, ni exista deterioro séptico ni hemodinámico.

Aim: To report an atypical presentation of a benign duodenal ulcer that simulates pancreatic neoplasia. Materials and Method: A case of a 83 years old male patient with astenia and jaundice due to a benign duodenal ulcer penetrating into the pancreas with obstruction of common bile duct. Imagining study identified a pancreatic head mass. The patient required one month admission, receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics, parenteral nutrition and intravenous proton pump inhibitors. Discussion and Conclusion: Due to frequent complications associated to this condition, such as haemodynamic failure, sepsis or free peritoneal perforation, surgery is the main treatment. However, in mild cases, as in our patient, conservative management can be considered. Penetration or fistulization to the head of the pancreas is a rare and serious complication of peptic ulcer disease. Its management can be conservative in selected cases where there is no perforation of the ulcer into the peritoneal cavity, nor septic or hemodynamic deterioration.

[Alzemon: a prospective follow-up study of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy]. / Alzemon: estudio de seguimiento prospectivo del acetato de eslicarbacepina en monoterapia en pacientes con epilepsia de diagnóstico reciente.

INTRODUCTION: Eslicarbazepine acetate is a novel sodium channel blocker for use in the treatment of focal onset seizures. Prospective studies on its effectiveness in monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy in routine clinical practice are scarce. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of eslicarbazepine as initial monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy in routine clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, multicentre, post-authorisation study. Patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy aged 18 years or older without previous treatment were included. The efficacy variables were: percentage of seizure-free patients, responders and reduction in monthly frequency of seizures. The safety variables analyse the 12-month retention rate and the occurrence of adverse effects. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included. The retention rate was 77.4%. At the end of the observation period, 83% of patients were seizure-free and 92.5% had reduced their baseline frequency by 50% or more. In addition, 68% of the patients reported some adverse effect and 7.5% of them dropped out of the study for this reason. The effectiveness analysis of the subgroup of patients aged 65 years or more showed no differences with respect to the overall population. CONCLUSION: Eslicarbazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy, both in the general population and in the population over 65 years old, is effective and safe in routine clinical practice.

TITLE: Alzemon: estudio de seguimiento prospectivo del acetato de eslicarbacepina en monoterapia en pacientes con epilepsia de diagnóstico reciente.Introducción. El acetato de eslicarbacepina es un nuevo bloqueante de los canales de sodio en el tratamiento de las crisis de inicio focal. Los estudios prospectivos sobre su efectividad en monoterapia en pacientes con epilepsia parcial de reciente diagnóstico en la práctica clínica habitual son escasos. Objetivo. Evaluar la efectividad de la eslicarbacepina en monoterapia de inicio en pacientes con epilepsia parcial de reciente diagnóstico en la práctica clínica habitual. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio postautorización prospectivo y multicéntrico. Se incluyó a pacientes con epilepsia parcial de reciente diagnóstico de 18 años o más sin tratamiento previo. Las variables de eficacia fueron: porcentaje de pacientes libres de crisis, respondedores y reducción en la frecuencia mensual de crisis. Las variables de seguridad analizan la tasa de retención a los 12 meses y la aparición de efectos adversos. Resultados. Se incluyó a 53 pacientes. La tasa de retención fue del 77,4%. Al final del período de observación, el 83% de los pacientes se encontraba libre de crisis y el 92,5% había reducido en un 50% o más su frecuencia basal. El 68% de los pacientes notificó algún efecto adverso y el 7,5% de ellos abandonó el estudio por este motivo. El análisis de efectividad del subgrupo de 65 años o más no mostró diferencias respecto a la población global. Conclusión. La eslicarbacepina en monoterapia en pacientes con epilepsia parcial de reciente diagnóstico, tanto en la población general como en la población de más de 65 años, es eficaz y segura en la práctica clínica habitual.

Alzemon: estudio de seguimiento prospectivo del acetato de eslicarbacepina en monoterapia en pacientes con epilepsia de diagnóstico reciente / Alzemon: a prospective follow-up study of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy

Introducción: El acetato de eslicarbacepina es un nuevo bloqueante de los canales de sodio en el tratamiento de las crisis de inicio focal. Los estudios prospectivos sobre su efectividad en monoterapia en pacientes con epilepsia parcia l de reciente diagnóstico en la práctica clínica habitual son escasos.Objetivo: Evaluar la efectividad de la eslicarbacepina en monoterapia de inicio en pacientes con epilepsia parcial de reciente diagnóstico en la práctica clínica habitual.Pacientes y métodos: Estudio postautorización prospectivo y multicéntrico. Se incluyó a pacientes con epilepsia parcial de reciente diagnóstico de 18 años o más sin tratamiento previo. Las variables de eficacia fueron: porcentaje de pacientes libres de crisis, respondedores y reducción en la frecuencia mensual de crisis. Las variables de seguridad analizan la tasa de retención a los 12 meses y la aparición de efectos adversos.Resultados: Se incluyó a 53 pacientes. La tasa de retención fue del 77,4%. Al final del período de observación, el 83% de los pacientes se encontraba libre de crisis y el 92,5% había reducido en un 50% o más su frecuencia basal. El 68% de los pacientes notificó algún efecto adverso y el 7,5% de ellos abandonó el estudio por este motivo. El análisis de efectividad del subgrupo de 65 años o más no mostró diferencias respecto a la población global.Conclusión: La eslicarbacepina en monoterapia en pacientes con epilepsia parcial de reciente diagnóstico, tanto en la población general como en la población de más de 65 años, es eficaz y segura en la práctica clínica habitual.(AU)

Introduction: Eslicarbazepine acetate is a novel sodium channel blocker for use in the treatment of focal onset seizures. Prospective studies on its effectiveness in monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy in routine clinical practice are scarce. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of eslicarbazepine as initial monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy in routine clinical practice. Patients and methods: A prospective, multicentre, post-authorisation study. Patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy aged 18 years or older without previous treatment were included. The efficacy variables were: percentage of seizure-free patients, responders and reduction in monthly frequency of seizures. The safety variables analyse the 12-month retention rate and the occurrence of adverse effects. Results: Fifty-three patients were included. The retention rate was 77.4%. At the end of the observation period, 83% of patients were seizure-free and 92.5% had reduced their baseline frequency by 50% or more. In addition, 68% of the patients reported some adverse effect and 7.5% of them dropped out of the study for this reason. The effectiveness analysis of the subgroup of patients aged 65 years or more showed no differences with respect to the overall population. Conclusion: Eslicarbazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy, both in the general population and in the population over 65 years old, is effective and safe in routine clinical practice.(AU)

Geographically distant isolates of the persistent southern tomato virus (STV) show very low genetic diversity in the putative coat protein gene.

Southern tomato virus (STV) from genus Amalgavirus (Family Amalgaviridae) is a persistent virus infecting tomato crops worldwide. Information on genetic diversity and evolutionary mechanisms for plant persistent viruses are very scarce in comparison with plant acute viruses. In this work, the putative coat protein gene of worldwide STV isolates was analyzed showing very low nucleotide diversity (< 0.0100). Phylogenetic analysis separated STV isolates into two clades, but no correlation was found between genetic and geographic distances. Also, no recombination events among STV isolates were detected. Comparison of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions indicated negative selection at the amino acid level.

¿Han influido el algoritmo de prescripción de la Administración y las guías de manejo de la dislipemia de la ACC/AHA 2013 en el manejo de la dislipemia? Proyecto MEJORA-LO CV / Have the Government's prescription algorithm and the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for managing dyslipidaemia influenced the management of dyslipidaemia? The MEJORALO-CV Project

OBJETIVO: Conocer el manejo de la dislipemia en atención primaria tras la publicación de la Guía de la American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) del año 2013 y el algoritmo de la Administración. MÉTODO: Estudio transversal descriptivo con encuesta a médicos de atención primaria de la Comunidad Valenciana entre enero y octubre de 2016. RESULTADOS: Participaron 199 facultativos con una media (desviación típica) de 48,9 (11) años de edad y 21,3 (11,1) años de experiencia. Las guías más seguidas eran las de la European Society of Cardiology (37,5%) y las de la Administración (23,4%). El 6,3% seguía la de la ACC/AHA 2013. El 88% establecía objetivos según colesterol LDL y riesgo cardiovascular. La elección del hipolipemiante estaba basada en su capacidad reductora de colesterol LDL (28,6%), algoritmo de la Administración (23,4%) y seguridad (20,4%). Estatinas, ezetimiba y fibratos eran los hipolipemiantes preferidos, y la combinación (51%) e incremento de dosis (35%) las estrategias en ausencia de control. Se determinaba perfil lipídico, transaminasas y creatincinasa cada 6 (59,5; 52,3 y 54,3%, respectivamente) o 12 meses (25,1; 29,2 y 30,3%, respectivamente). Un 41% era conocedor de la polémica con la Guía ACC/AHA 2013, y aunque un 60% reconocía su relevancia, solo un 21% modificó su quehacer diario por ella. CONCLUSIONES: El algoritmo de la Administración tuvo mayor impacto que la Guía ACC/AHA 2013 en atención primaria. Campos de mejora fueron el bajo uso de guías y tablas de riesgo validadas, y racionalización de la periodicidad de las analíticas

OBJECTIVE: To determine the management of dyslipidaemia in primary care after the publication of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) 2013 guidelines and Valencian government's algorithm. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study that employed a survey of primary care physicians of the Community of Valencia between January and October 2016. RESULTS: A total of 199 physicians (mean age, 48.9±11.0 years; experience, 21.3±11.1 years) participated in the survey. The most followed guidelines were those of the European Society of Cardiology (37.5% of respondents) and Valencian government (23.4% of respondents). Some 6.3% of the respondents followed the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines, and 88.0% established objectives based on LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular risk. The choice of lipid-lowering drug was based on its LDL cholesterol lowering capacity (28.6% of respondents), on the Valencian government's algorithm (23.4%) and on the drug's safety (20.4%). Statins, ezetimibe and fibrates were the preferred hypolipemiant agents, and their combination (51% of respondents) and dosage increases (35%) were the strategies employed for poor control. Lipid profile and transaminase and creatine kinase levels were measured every 6 (59.5%, 52.3% and 54.3% of respondents, respectively) or 12 months (25.1%, 29.2% and 30.3%, respectively). Forty-one percent of the respondents were aware of the controversy surrounding the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines. Although 60% of the respondents acknowledged its relevance, only 21% changed their daily practices accordingly. CONCLUSIONS: The Valencian government's algorithm had a greater impact than the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines in primary care in Valencia. Areas for improvement included the low use of validated guidelines and risk tables and the streamlining of laboratory test periodicity