Eliciting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses from synthetic vectors containing one or two epitopes in a C57BL/6 mouse model using peptide-containing biodegradable microspheres and adjuvants.

We describe a vaccine delivery mechanism consisting of a synthetic, non-living vector of large d,l poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) microspheres that carry specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes. We demonstrate in mice that it can be used to elicit substantial interferon gamma ELISPOT responses to more than one specific epitope in the same individual. Our data suggest that a superior adjuvant configuration for the formulation is to place a TLR-9 agonist CpG inside the microsphere and a TLR-4 agonist MPLA in the injectate solution. This finding contrasts with the observations of others. Our approach provides a means to elicit immune responses efficiently to select epitopes, which may be important for an effective vaccine against HIV.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled versus intravenous morphine in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: A new pulmonary drug delivery system produces aerosols from disposable packets of medication. This study compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of morphine delivered by an AERx prototype with intravenous morphine. METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers were enrolled. Two subjects were administered four inhalations of 2.2 mg morphine each at 1-min intervals or 4.4 mg over 3 min by intravenous infusion. Thirteen subjects were given twice the above doses, i.e., eight inhalations or 8.8 mg intravenously over 7 min. Arterial blood sampling was performed every minute during administration and at 2, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, and 240 min after administration. The effect of morphine was assessed by measuring pupil diameter and ventilatory response to a hypercapnic challenge. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were performed simultaneously using mixed-effect models. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic data after intravenous administration were described by a three-exponent decay model preceded by a lag time. The pharmacokinetic model for administration by inhalation consisted of the three-exponent intravenous pharmacokinetic model preceded by a two-exponent absorption model. The authors found that, with administration by inhalation, the total bioavailability was 59%, of which 43% was absorbed almost instantaneously and 57% was absorbed with a half-life of 18 min. The median times to the half-maximal miotic effects of morphine were 10 and 5.5 min after inhalation and intravenous administration, respectively (P < 0.01). The pharmacodynamic parameter ke0 was approximately 0.003 min-1. CONCLUSIONS: The onset and duration of the effects of morphine are similar after intravenous administration or inhalation via this new pulmonary drug delivery system. Morphine bioavailability after such administration is 59% of the dose loaded into the dosage form.

Comparison of in vitro and in vivo efficiencies of a novel unit-dose liquid aerosol generator and a pressurized metered dose inhaler.

Gamma scintigraphic imaging was employed in 10 healthy volunteers to compare the total and regional lung deposition of aerosols generated by two delivery platforms that permitted microprocessor-controlled actuation at an optimal point during inhalation. An aqueous solution containing 99mTc-DTPA was used to assess the deposition of aerosols delivered by inhalation from two successive unit-dosage forms (44 microl volume) using a prototype of a novel liquid aerosol system (AERx Pulmonary Delivery System). This was compared with aerosol deposition after inhalation of two 50 microl puffs of a 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled solution formulation from a pressurized metered dose inhaler (MDI). The in vitro size characteristics of the radiolabeled aerosols were determined by cascade impaction. For the AERx system, the predicted lung delivery efficiency based on the product of emitted dose (60.8%, coefficient of variation (CV)=12%) and fine particle fraction (% by mass of aerosol particles <5.7 microm in diameter) was 53.3% (CV=13%). For the solution MDI, the emitted dose was 62.9% (CV=13%) and the predicted lung dose was 44. 9% (CV=15%). The AERx system demonstrated efficient and reproducible dosing characteristics in vivo. Of the dose loaded into the device, the mean percent reaching the lungs was 53.3% (CV=10%), with only 6. 9% located in the oropharynx/stomach. In contrast, the lung deposition from the solution MDI was significantly less (21.7%) and more variable (CV=31%), with 42.0% of the radiolabel detected in the oropharynx/stomach. Analysis of the regional deposition of the radioaerosol indicated a homogeneous pattern of deposition after delivery from the AERx system. A predominantly central pattern of distribution occurred after MDI delivery, where the pattern of deposition was biased towards a central zone depicting the conducting airways. The AERx system, in contrast to MDIs, seems highly suited to the delivery of systemically active agents via pulmonary administration.

Pulmonary insulin administration using the AERx system: physiological and physicochemical factors influencing insulin effectiveness in healthy fasting subjects.

BACKGROUND: Orally inhaled insulin may provide a convenient and effective therapy for prandial glucose control in patients with diabetes. This study evaluated the influence of formulation pH and concentration and different respiratory maneuvers on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of inhaled insulin. METHODS: Three, open-label crossover studies in a total of 23 healthy subjects were conducted in which the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of insulin inhalation were compared to subcutaneous (SC) injection into the abdomen of commercially available regular insulin. A novel, aerosol generating system (AERx Diabetes Management System, Aradigm Corporation, Hayward, CA) was used to deliver aqueous insulin bolus aerosols to the lower respiratory tract from formulations at pH 3.5 or 7.4 and concentrations of U250 (250 U/mL) or U500 (500 U/mL). RESULTS: Time to maximum insulin concentration in serum (Tmax) after SC dosing occurred approximately 50-60 minutes with the time to minimum plasma glucose concentration (i.e., maximum hypoglycemic effect), (TGmin), occurring later, at around 100-120 minutes. In contrast, pulmonary delivery led to a significantly earlier Tmax (7-20 minutes) and TGmin (60-70 minutes), parameters that were shown to be largely unaffected by changing the pH or concentration of the insulin. However, investigation of changes in inhaled volume (achieved by different programming of the AERx system) for administration of the same sized aerosol bolus revealed significant effects. Significantly slower absorption and time to peak hypoglycemic activity occurred when aerosol delivery of insulin occurred during a shallow (approximately 40% vital capacity) as opposed to a deep (approximately 80% vital capacity) inspiration. In addition, it was shown that serum concentration of insulin increased immediately after a series of forced expiraratory maneuvers 30 minutes after inhaled delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary delivery of aqueous bolus aerosols of insulin in healthy subjects resulted in rapid absorption with an associated hypoglycemic effect quicker than is achieved after subcutaneous dosing of regular insulin. Inhaled insulin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were independent of formulation variables (pH, concentration) but affected by certain respiratory maneuvers.

Inhalation delivery systems with compliance and disease management capabilities.

Non-compliance with prescribed medication is a major reason for poor therapeutic outcomes, leading to unnecessary contributions to healthcare costs. Poor technique in self-administration of inhalation therapy is a special type of non-compliance associated with this route of administration. However, pulmonary drug delivery has fundamental advantages for therapy of diseases of the respiratory tract because it is site-directed. The lung is also a promising portal for drug delivery into the systemic circulation. Incorporation of microprocessors into pulmonary drug delivery systems facilitates sophisticated compliance management of chronic diseases such as asthma and diabetes. Microprocessor-assisted systems afford control of patients' administration technique during the therapeutic inhalation event, thus leading to efficient and reproducible regional deposition of the inhaled drug or diagnostic agent. SmartMist is a hand-held asthma disease management device that aids patients to use optimally metered dose inhalers. It also measures pulmonary lung function and provides a long term downloadable electronic record of the therapeutic and diagnostic events. The AERx pulmonary delivery system utilizes similar microprocessor capabilities; however, it employs a novel means of generating aqueous aerosols from unit dose packages, thus providing a broad inhalation technology base for delivery of a wide variety of therapeutic and diagnostic agents into the respiratory tract, and via the lung into the systemic circulation.

Morphine pharmacokinetics after pulmonary administration from a novel aerosol delivery system.

BACKGROUND: Successful pharmacotherapy of pain often depends on the mode of drug delivery. A novel, unit dose, aqueous aerosol delivery system (AERx Pulmonary Drug Delivery System) was used to examine the feasibility of the pulmonary route for the noninvasive systemic administration of morphine. METHODS: The study had two parts: (1) a dose-ranging study in four subjects with three consecutive aerosolized doses of 2.2, 4.4, and 8.8 mg (nominal) morphine sulfate pentahydrate at 40-minute intervals, and (2) a crossover study, on separate days, in six subjects with 4.4 mg (nominal) aerosolized morphine sulfate administered over 2.1 minutes on three occasions and intravenous infusions of 2 and 4 mg over 3 minutes. Subjects were healthy volunteers from 19 to 34 years old. Arterial blood was sampled for a total of 6 hours and plasma morphine concentrations were measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: In part 1, plasma morphine concentrations were proportional to dose. In part 2, the mean +/- SD peak plasma concentration (Cmax) occurred at 2.7 +/- 0.8 minutes after the aerosol dose, with mean values for Cmax of 109 +/- 85, 165 +/- 22, and 273 +/- 114 ng/ml for the aerosol and 2 and 4 mg intravenous doses, respectively. The bioavailability [AUC(0-360 min)] of aerosol-delivered morphine was approximately 100% relative to intravenous infusion, with similar intersubject variability in AUC for both routes (coefficient of variation < 30%). CONCLUSION: The time courses of plasma morphine concentrations after pulmonary delivery by the AERx system and by intravenous infusions were similar. This shows the utility of the pulmonary route in providing a noninvasive method for the rapid and reproducible systemic administration of morphine if an appropriate aerosol drug delivery system is used.

Refractory bradycardia during retrograde pyelography and spinal anesthesia.

Bradycardia commonly occurs during spinal anesthesia as a result of vagally mediated slowing of sinoatrial (SA) node firing. Peritoneal traction or urinary bladder distension, for example, may serve as a stimulus for SA node inhibition, particularly when thoracic levels of spinal anesthesia interrupt function of the sympathetic limb of the autonomic nervous system. Although atropine dependably reverses such heart rate slowing, we recently encountered, during spinal anesthesia for cystoscopy and retrograde pyelography, bradycardia that was unexpected and refractory to treatment with atropine.