dCROX and ROX Indices Predict Clinical Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia Treated with High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy.

Background: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is a common respiratory support in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Predictive tools for the evaluation of successful weaning from HFNC therapy for COVID-19 pneumonia have been limited. This study aimed to develop a new predictor for weaning success from HFNC treatment in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at Thammasat University Hospital, Thailand. Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring HFNC therapy from April 2020 to September 2021 were included. The ROX index was defined as the ratio of oxygen saturation (SpO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) to respiratory rate. The CROX index was defined as the ratio of C-reactive protein (CRP) to the ROX index. dCROX was defined as the difference in CROX index between 24 hours and 72 hours. Weaning success was defined as the ability to sustain spontaneous breathing after separation from HFNC without any invasive or noninvasive ventilatory support for ≥48 hours or death. Results: A total of 106 patients (49.1% male) were included. The mean age was 62.1 ± 16.2 years. Baseline SpO2/FiO2 was 276.1 ± 124.8. The rate of HFNC weaning success within 14 days was 61.3%. The best cutoff value of the dCROX index to predict HFNC weaning success was 3.15 with 66.2% sensitivity, 70.7% specificity, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59-0.81, p < 0.001). The best cutoff value of the ROX index was 9.13, with 75.4% sensitivity, 78.0% specificity, and an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.69-0.88, p < 0.001). Conclusions: ROX index has the highest accuracy for predicting successful weaning from HFNC in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. dCROX index is the alternative tool for this setting. However, a larger prospective cohort study is needed to verify these indices for determining separation from HFNC therapy. This trial is registered with TCTR20221107004.

Comparison of ROX, HROX, and delta-HR indices to predict successful weaning from high-flow oxygen therapy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is commonly used to treat acute respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. However, predictors of successful weaning from HFNC in these patients has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: To assess predictors of successful separation from HFNC in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a university hospital in Thailand. Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring HFNC therapy between April 2020 and June 2022 were included. ROX index was defined as the ratio of oxygen saturation (SpO2) / fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) to respiratory rate. Heart-ROX (HROX) index was defined as ROX multiplied by heart rate (HR) improvement. HR improvement (delta-HR) was defined as a percentage of the difference between the baseline HR and the morning HR at HFNC weaning day 1 divided by the baseline HR. Weaning success was defined as ability to sustain spontaneous breathing after separation from HFNC without any invasive or non-invasive ventilatory support for ≥48 hours or death. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients (54% male) were included. Mean age was 61.1±16.1 years. Baseline SpO2/FiO2 was 265.3±110.8. HFNC weaning success was 77.4%. The best cut-off value of ROX index to predict HFNC weaning success was 7.88 with 100% sensitivity, 97.3% specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.937-1.000, p<0.001). The best cut-off value of delta-HR 3.7 with 88.2% sensitivity, 75.7% specificity, and AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.748-0.919, p<0.001). The best cut-off value of HROX index was 59.2 with 88.2% sensitivity, 81.1% specificity, and AUC of 0.89, (95% CI: 0.835-0.953, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The ROX index has the highest accuracy for predicting successful weaning off HFNC treatment in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. While HROX and delta-HR indices can serve as alternative tools, it is recommended to verify these indices and determine the optimal cut-off value for determining separation from HFNC therapy through a large prospective cohort study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.in.th number: TCTR20221108004.

The Effect of Nintedanib in Post-COVID-19 Lung Fibrosis: An Observational Study.

Background: Lung fibrosis is a sequela of COVID-19 among patients with severe pneumonia. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and lung fibrosis due to COVID-19 may share many similar features. There are limited data on effects of antifibrotic treatment of infection-related lung fibrosis. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of nintedanib on patients' post-COVID-19 lung fibrosis. Methods: A retrospective, matched case-control study was performed on hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients who received nintedanib treatment for COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis (nintedanib group) were compared to patients with standard treatment (control group). The primary outcome was oxygen improvement. The secondary outcomes were chest X-ray improvement, SpO2/FiO2 ratio improvement, mortality rates at 60 days, and adverse events. Results: A total of 42 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were included (21 in each group). Mean age was 64.43 ± 14.59 years, and 54.8% were men. At baseline, SpO2/FiO2 ratio before treatment was 200.57 ± 105.77 in the nintedanib group and 326.90 ± 137.10 in the control group (P = 0.002). Oxygen improvement and chest X-ray improvement were found in 71.4% and 71.4% in the nintedanib group and in 66.7% and 66.7% in the control group (P = 0.739). The nintedanib group had more improvement in SpO2/FiO2 ratio than in the control group (144.38 ± 118.05 vs 55.67 ± 75.09, P = 0.006). The 60-day mortality rates of the nintedanib and the control groups were 38.1% vs 23.8%, P = 0.317. Hepatitis and loss of appetite were common adverse events (9.5% and 9.5%), while the incidence of diarrhea was 4.8%. Conclusions: Nintedanib as add-on treatment in post-COVID-19 lung fibrosis did not improve oxygenation, chest X-ray findings, or the 60-day mortality. However, this antifibrotic drug improved SpO2/FiO2 ratio in our patients. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the efficacy of nintedanib for treatment of patients with post-COVID-19 lung fibrosis. Trial Registration. This study was registered in TCTR20220426001.

Patient characteristics and outcomes of a home mechanical ventilation program in a developing country.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on home mechanical ventilation (HMV) in developing countries. This study aimed to describe the patient characteristics, feasibility, and outcomes of an HMV program at a university hospital in Thailand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected on all patients who were discharged with HMV between October 2014 and August 2015 at Thammasat University Hospital. RESULTS: Twelve patients (eight men and four women) underwent HMV. They were aged 71.5 ± 17.6 years; mean ± standard deviation. Indications for HMV were 6 neurologic diseases (4 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 1 multiple system atrophy, and 1 stroke), 2 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 1 tracheomalacia, and 3 combined neurologic diseases and respiratory diseases (2 stroke and COPD, 1 stroke and tracheomalacia). The duration of follow-up was 799.5 ± 780.5 days. The ratio of family income to cost of HMV usage was 77.2:1 ± 5.5:1. All patients had tracheostomies. Modes of HMV were biphasic positive airway pressure (66.7%), pressure-controlled ventilation (16.7%), pressure-support ventilation (8.3%), and volume-controlled ventilation (8.3%). Complications occurred in ten patients (83.3%), including tracheobronchitis (20 events) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (12 events). Overall mortality was 41.7% (5/12 patients), including two patients who died due to ventilator-associated pneumonia. There were no instances of ventilator malfunction. CONCLUSIONS: HMV is feasible for patients with neurological diseases and COPD in a developing country. The relatively high rate of complications indicates the need for more comprehensive clinical services for chronic ventilator-dependent patients in this setting.

Diagnostic Value of Pleural Fluid Adenosine Deaminase in Tuberculous Pleuritis at Thammasat University Hospital.

Background: Pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADAPF) is a diagnostic test for diagnosing the early tuberculous pleuritis (TBP). However, cutoff values vary widely in many studies. Objective: To determine the optimal diagnostic value of ADAPF. Material and Method: A prospective study was performed between August 2012 and August 2014. One hundred seventyeight patients with pleural effusions; 29 TBPs, 63 malignant pleural effusions (MPEs), 40 parapneumonic effusions (PARAEs), 18 transudates, 5 empyemas, 19 other exudates, and 4 unknown causes, were investigated. Results: Mean + SD of ADAPF was 60.0+25.6 U/L with TBPs, 15.6+11.1 U/L with MPEs, 15.8+9.9 U/L with PARAEs, 6.6+5.7 U/L with transudates, 13.8+7.7 U/L with empyemas, 14.5+7.1 U/L with other exudates, and 17.8+4.6 U/L with unknown causes. The area under the ROC curve was 0.983 (95% CI: 0.969-0.998) for the best ADAPF cutoff value of 33.5 U/L, with 93.1% sensitivity, 94.6 % specificity, 77.1% positive predictive value, and 98.6% negative predictive. ADAPF level <30.5 U/L suggests that a TBP is highly unlikely. Conclusion: Pleural fluid ADA assay is a helpful diagnostic tool with high sensitivity and specificity for the rapid diagnosis of TBP.