Reduced septal glucose metabolism predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of patients do not respond to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). Recent work has focused on quantifying mechanical dyssynchrony and left ventricular scar. Septal reverse-mismatch (R-MM) (reduced FDG uptake vs perfusion) has been observed in patients with cardiomyopathy and prolonged QRS duration. We hypothesized that a greater quantity of septal R-MM would indicate a greater potential for reversibility of the cardiomyopathy, when the dyssynchrony is improved with CRT. Therefore, this study's objective was to assess whether greater septal R-MM pattern predicts response to CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-nine patients had pre-implant Rubidium-82 and Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning. Total and regional left ventricular scar size and extent of R-MM were calculated. Response to CRT was defined as ≥10% improvement in left ventricular end-systolic volume or ≥5% absolute ejection fraction improvement. In the non-ischemic cardiomyopathy subset non-responders had significantly less septal R-MM than responders (13.1% compared to 27.1%, P = .012). There were correlations between the extent of septal R-MM and the increase in ejection fraction (r = 0.692, P = .0004) and reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (r = -0.579, P = .004). For each 5% absolute increase in extent of septal R-MM the odds ratio of being a responder was 2.17 (95% CI 1.15, 4.11, P = .017). Extent of septal R-MM displayed high sensitivity and specificity (area under curve = 0.855, P = .017) to predict response. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, greater extent of septal glucose metabolic R-MM pattern, predicted response to CRT. This parameter may be useful for identifying patients who benefit from CRT.

Effect of lateral wall scar on reverse remodeling with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of patients do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Recent work has focused on quantifying left ventricular (LV) scar, with conflicting results. Some studies have shown that the global extent of LV scar is important, whereas others found the size of the septal or lateral wall scar to be key. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to examine the relative importance of the size and distribution of LV scar in determining reverse remodeling to CRT. METHODS: Forty-nine patients had pre-implantation rubidium-82 and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scanning. Total and regional LV scar size were calculated. Response to CRT was pre-specified as > or =10% improvement in LV end-systolic volume and/or > or =5% absolute ejection fraction improvement. RESULTS: Responders (n = 31) had significantly less lateral wall scar than responders (5.6% compared with 24.5%, P = .008) but a similar extent of global and septal scar. In the ischemic group, responders' median lateral wall scar size was 11.2% (IQR 0.0 to 31.2), compared with 47.8% (IQR 21.2 to 73.4) P = .052. In the ischemic group, for each 5% absolute decrease in lateral scar size, the odds ratio of being a responder was 1.87 (95% CI: 1.11 to 3.15, P = .018). In the nonischemic group, median lateral wall scar size of responders was 3.4% (IQR 0.0 to 10.3) compared with the nonresponders, 14.4% (IQR 9.0 to 27.8), P = .046. CONCLUSION: Responders had significantly less lateral wall scar than nonresponders, but a similar extent of global and septal scar. This held true in both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients.