Worse survival for TP53 (p53)-mutated breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant CMF.

BACKGROUND: TP53 has been described as a prognostic factor in many malignancies, including breast cancer. Whether it also might be a predictive factor with reference to chemo- and endocrine therapy is more controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated relapse-free (RFS), breast cancer-corrected (BCCS) and overall survival (OS) related to TP53 status in node-positive breast cancer patients that had received polychemotherapy [cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF)] and/or endocrine therapy (tamoxifen). Sequence analyses of the whole TP53 coding region was performed in 376 patients operated on for primary breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastases between 1984 and 1989 (median follow-up time 84 months). RESULTS: TP53 mutations were found in 105 patients (28%). We found 90 (82%) of the 110 mutations in the more frequently analysed exons 5-8, while the other 20 (18%) were located in exons 3-4 and 9-10, respectively. Univariate analyses showed TP53 to be a significant prognostic factor with regard to RFS, BCCS and OS in patients who received adjuvant CMF. CONCLUSIONS: TP53 mutations might induce resistance to certain modalities of breast cancer therapy. Sequence-determined TP53 mutation was of negative prognostic value in the total patient population and in the CMF treated patients.

Timing of CMF chemotherapy in combination with tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with breast cancer: role of endocrine responsiveness of the tumor.

BACKGROUND: Controversy persists about whether chemotherapy benefits all breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trial VII, 1212 postmenopausal patients with node-positive disease were randomized to receive tamoxifen for 5 years or tamoxifen plus three concurrent courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil ('classical' CMF) chemotherapy, either early, delayed or both. In IBCSG trial IX, 1669 postmenopausal patients with node-negative disease were randomized to receive either tamoxifen alone or three courses of adjuvant classical CMF prior to tamoxifen. Results were assessed according to estrogen receptor (ER) content of the primary tumor. RESULTS: For patients with node-positive, ER-positive disease, adding CMF either early, delayed or both reduced the risk of relapse by 21% (P=0.06), 26% (P=0.02) and 25% (P=0.02), respectively, compared with tamoxifen alone. There was no difference in disease-free survival when CMF was given prior to tamoxifen in patients with node-negative, ER-positive tumors. CONCLUSIONS: CMF given concurrently (early, delayed or both) with tamoxifen was more effective than tamoxifen alone for patients with node-positive, endocrine-responsive breast cancer, supporting late administration of chemotherapy even after commencement of tamoxifen. In contrast, sequential CMF and tamoxifen for patients with node-negative, endocrine-responsive disease was ineffective.

Quantifying trade-offs: quality of life and quality-adjusted survival in a randomised trial of chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer.

We evaluated quality of life (QL) and quality-adjusted survival in International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial IX, a randomised trial including 1669 eligible patients receiving tamoxifen for 5 years or three prior cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) followed by 57 months tamoxifen. During the time with CMF toxicity (Tox), without symptoms and toxicity (TWiST), and following relapse (Rel), patients scored their QL indicators and a utility indicator for subjective health estimation between 'perfect' and 'worst' health. Scores were averaged within Tox, TWiST and Rel and transformed to utilities. Mean durations for the three transition times were weighted with utilities to obtain mean quality-adjusted TWiST (Q-TWiST). Patients receiving CMF reported significantly worse scores for most QL domains at month 3, but less hot flushes. After completing chemotherapy, there were no differences by treatment groups. Benefits evaluated by Q-TWiST favoured the additional chemotherapy. CMF provided 3 more months of Q-TWiST for patients with ER-negative tumours, but CMF provided no benefit in Q-TWiST for patients with ER-positive tumours. Q-TWiST analysis based on patient ratings is feasible in large-scale cross-cultural clinical trials.

Body mass index as a prognostic feature in operable breast cancer: the International Breast Cancer Study Group experience.

BACKGROUND: Current information on the prognostic importance of body mass index (BMI) for patients with early breast cancer is based on a variety of equivocal reports. Few have data on BMI in relationship to systemic treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (6792) were randomized to International Breast Cancer Study Group trials from 1978 to 1993, studying chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. BMI was evaluated with eight other factors: menopausal status, nodal status, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, tumor size, vessel invasion, tumor grade and treatment. BMI was categorized as normal (< or =24.9), intermediate (25.0-29.9) or obese (> or =30.0). RESULTS: Patients with normal BMI had significantly longer overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) than patients with intermediate or obese BMI in pairwise comparisons adjusted for other factors. Subset analyses showed the same effect in pre- and perimenopausal patients and in those receiving chemotherapy alone. When assessed globally and adjusted for other factors, BMI significantly influenced OS (P = 0.03) but not DFS (P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: BMI is an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with breast cancer, especially among pre-/perimenopausal patients treated with chemotherapy without endocrine therapy.

Duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a joint analysis of two randomised trials investigating three versus six courses of CMF.

Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil adjuvant combination chemotherapy for breast cancer is currently used for the duration of six monthly courses. We performed a joint analysis of two studies on the duration of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil in patients with node-positive breast cancer to investigate whether three courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil might suffice. The International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VI randomly assigned 735 pre- and perimenopausal patients to receive 'classical' cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil for three consecutive cycles, or the same chemotherapy for six consecutive cycles. The German Breast Cancer Study Group randomised 289 patients to receive either three or six cycles of i.v. cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil day 1, 8. Treatment effects were estimated using Cox regression analysis stratified by clinical trial without further adjustment for covariates. The 5-year disease-free survival per cents (+/-s.e.) were 54+/-2% for three cycles and 55+/-2% for six cycles (n=1024; risk ratio (risk ratio: CMFx3/CMFx6), 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.85 to 1.18; P=0.99). Use of three rather than six cycles was demonstrated to be adequate in both studies for patients at least 40-years-old with oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours (n=594; risk ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.08; P=0.19). In fact, results slightly favoured three cycles over six for this subgroup, and the 95% confidence interval excluded an adverse effect of more than 2% with respect to absolute 5-year survival. In contrast, three cycles appeared to be possibly inferior to six cycles for women less than 40-years-old (n=190; risk ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.80; P=0.22) and for women with oestrogen-receptor-negative tumours (n=302; risk ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.85 to 1.57; P=0.37). Thus, three initial cycles of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil chemotherapy were as effective as six cycles for older patients (40-years-old) with oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours, while six cycles of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil might still be required for other cohorts. Because endocrine therapy with tamoxifen and GnRH analogues is now available for younger women with oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours, the need for six cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil is unclear and requires further investigation.

Influence of endocrine-related factors on response to perioperative chemotherapy for patients with node-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We investigated tumor- and patient-related features that might influence the response to perioperative chemotherapy (PeCT) compared with no adjuvant therapy for patients with node-negative breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,275 patients were randomized to either no adjuvant treatment (427 patients) or PeCT (848 patients). The following variables thought to have prognostic significance were evaluated: grade, tumor size, estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) content (absent; low, 1 to 9 fmol/mg cytosol protein; or positive, > or = 10 fmol/mg cytosol protein), c-erbB-2 overexpression, menopausal status, and age. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the relative influence of these factors to predict the effect of PeCT on disease-free survival (DFS). Median follow-up was 13.5 years. RESULTS: The 10-year DFS percentage for 692 premenopausal patients did not significantly differ between the PeCT and no-adjuvant-treatment groups: 61% and 59%, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.20; P = .70). No predictive factors were identified. For 583 postmenopausal patients, 10-year DFS percentages for the groups were 63% and 58%, respectively (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.93; P = .03). The absence of expression of ER, PgR, or both ER and PgR was the most important factor predicting improved outcome with PeCT among postmenopausal patients. The 10-year DFS percentages were 85% and 53% for the steroid hormone receptor-absent cohort of treated and untreated patients, respectively (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.49; P = .0009). CONCLUSION: The role of PeCT should be explored for patients whose primary tumors do not express steroid hormone receptors, because it is likely that early initiation of treatment is exclusively relevant for such patients.

Clinical relevance of single item quality of life indicators in cancer clinical trials.

We investigated the hypothesis that global single-item quality-of-life indicators are less precise for specific treatment effects (discriminant validity) than multi-item scales but similarly efficient for overall treatment comparisons and changes over time (responsiveness) because they reflect the summation of the individual meaning and importance of various factors. Linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) indicators for physical well-being, mood and coping were compared with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), the Mood Adjective Check List (MACL) and the emotional behaviour and social interaction scales of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) in 84 patients with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant therapy. Discriminant validity was investigated by multitrait-multimethod correlation, responsiveness by standardized response mean (SRM). Discriminant validity of the indicators was present at baseline but less under treatment. Responsiveness was demonstrated by the expected pattern among treatments (P = 0.008). In patients without chemotherapy, the SRMs indicated moderate (0.5-0.8) to large (>0.8) improvements in physical well-being (0.70), coping (0.92), HAD anxiety (0.89) and depression (1.19), and MACL mental well-being (0.68). In patients with chemotherapy for the first 3 months, small but clinically significant improvements (>).2) included mood (0.38), coping (0.41), HAD axiety (0.31) and MACL mental well-being (0.35). Patients with 6 months chemotherapy showed no changes. The indicators also reflected mood disorders (HAD) and marked psychosocial dysfunction (SIP) at baseline and under treatment according to pre-defined cut-off levels. Global indicators were confirmed to be efficient for evaluating treatments overall and changes over time. The lower reliability of single as opposed to multi-item scales affects primarily their discriminant validity. This is less decisive in large sample sizes.

Identifying breast cancer patients at high risk for bone metastases.

PURPOSE: To identify patient populations at high risk for bone metastases at any time after diagnosis of operable breast cancer, because these patients are potential beneficiaries of treatment with bisphosphonates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated data from 6,792 patients who were randomized in International Breast Cancer Study Group clinical trials between 1978 and 1993. Median follow-up was 10. 7 years. A total of 1,275 patients (18.7%) presented with node-negative disease, whereas 3,354 patients (49.4%) had one to three and 2,163 patients (31.9%) had four or more involved axillary lymph nodes. We also assessed the incidence of subsequent bone metastases in the cohort of 1,220 patients who had a first event in local or regional sites or soft tissue alone. Median follow-up for this cohort was 7.7 years from first recurrence. RESULTS: For the entire population with operable disease, the cumulative incidence of bone metastases at any time was 8.2% at 2 years from randomization and 27.3% at 10 years. The highest cumulative incidences of bone metastases at any time were among patients who had four or more involved axillary nodes at the time of diagnosis (14.9% at 2 years and 40.8% at 10 years) and among patients who had as their first event a local or regional recurrence or a recurrence in soft tissue, without any other overt metastases (21.1% at 2 years from first recurrence and 36.7% at 10 years). CONCLUSION: Treatments to prevent bone metastases may have a major impact on the course of breast cancer and may be most efficiently studied in populations with several involved axillary nodes at the time of presentation and in populations with local or regional recurrence or recurrence in soft tissue.

Is chemotherapy alone adequate for young women with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer?

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of breast cancer in very young women is generally considered to be unfavourable. Therefore, the outcome of adjuvant therapy was analysed in a population of young (<35 years) premenopausal patients treated in four randomised controlled trials. METHODS: Between 1978 and 1993 the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) treated 3700 premenopausal and perimenopausal patients with various timing and duration of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF with or without low-dose prednisone and oophorectomy). 314 of these women were less than 35 years old at randomisation. FINDINGS: Relapse and death occurred earlier and more often in younger (<35 years) than in older (> or = 35) patients with a 10 year disease-free survival of 35% (SE 3) versus 47% (1) (hazard ratio 1.41 [95% CI 1.22-1.62], p<0.001) and overall survival of 49% (3) versus 62% (1) (1.50 [1.28-1.77], p<0.001). Younger patients with oestrogen-receptor positive tumours had a significantly worse disease-free survival than younger patients with oestrogen-receptor negative tumours. By contrast, among older patients the disease-free survival was similar irrespective of oestrogen-receptor status. INTERPRETATION: Young premenopausal breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant CMF chemotherapy had higher risk of relapse and death than older premenopausal patients, especially if their tumours expressed oestrogen receptors. The endocrine effects of chemotherapy alone are insufficient for the younger age group and these patients should strongly consider additional endocrine therapies (tamoxifen or ovarian ablation) if their tumours express oestrogen receptors.

Burdens and benefits of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil and tamoxifen for elderly patients with breast cancer: the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VII.

PURPOSE: Information on the tolerability and efficacy of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for older women is limited. We studied these issues using the data collected as part of the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VII. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women with operable, node-positive breast cancer were randomized to receive either tamoxifen alone for 5 years (306 patients) or tamoxifen plus three consecutive cycles of classical cyclophosphamide (100 mg/m(2) orally days 1 to 14), methotrexate (40 mg/m(2) intravenous days 1 and 8), and fluorouracil (600 mg/m(2) intravenous days 1 and 8) every 28 days (CMF; 302 patients). The median follow-up was 8.0 years. RESULTS: Among the 299 patients who received at least one dose of CMF, women 65 years of age or older (n = 76) had higher grades of toxicity compared with women less than 65 years old (n = 223) (P =.004). More women in the older age group compared with the younger women experienced grade 3 toxicity of any type (17% v 7%, respectively), grade 3 hematologic toxicity (9% v 5%, respectively), and grade 3 mucosal toxicity (4% v 1%, respectively). Older patients also received less than their expected CMF dose compared with younger postmenopausal women (P =.0008). The subjective burdens of treatment, however, were similar for younger and older patients based on quality-of-life measures (performance status, coping, physical well-being, mood, and appetite). For older patients, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 63% for CMF plus tamoxifen and 61% for tamoxifen alone (hazards ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 1.52; P =.99). For younger patients, the corresponding 5-year DFS rates were 61% and 53% (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.91; P =.008), but the test for heterogeneity of CMF effect according to age group was not statistically significant. The reduced effectiveness of CMF among older women could not be attributed to dose reductions according to dose received. CONCLUSION: CMF tolerability and effectiveness were both reduced for older patients compared with younger postmenopausal node-positive breast cancer patients who received tamoxifen for 5 years. The development and evaluation of less toxic and more effective chemotherapy regimens are required for high-risk elderly patients.

Early start of adjuvant chemotherapy may improve treatment outcome for premenopausal breast cancer patients with tumors not expressing estrogen receptors. The International Breast Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: The proper time to commence adjuvant chemotherapy after primary surgery for breast cancer is unknown. An analysis of the International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial V at a median follow-up of 11 years suggested that early initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy might improve outcome for premenopausal, node-positive patients whose tumors did not express any estrogen receptor (ER). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated the relationship between early initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, ER status, and prognosis in 1,788 premenopausal, node-positive patients treated on IBCSG trials I, II, and VI. The disease-free survival for 599 patients (84 with ER-absent tumors) who commenced adjuvant chemotherapy within 20 days (early initiation) was compared with the disease-free survival for 1,189 patients (142 with ER-absent tumors) who started chemotherapy 21 to 86 days after surgery (conventional initiation). The median follow-up was 7.7 years. RESULTS: Among patients with ER-absent tumors, the 10-year disease-free survival was 60% for the early initiation group compared with 34% for the conventional initiation group (226 patients; hazard ratio [HR], 0. 49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33 to 0.72; P =.0003). This difference remained statistically significant in a Cox multiple regression analysis controlling for study group, number of positive nodes, tumor size, age, vessel invasion, and institution (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.92; P =.019). Conversely, early initiation of chemotherapy did not significantly improve disease-free survival for patients with tumors expressing ER (1,562 patients; multiple regression HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.10; P =.40). CONCLUSION: In premenopausal patients with ER-absent tumors, early initiation of systemic chemotherapy after primary surgery might improve outcome. Further confirmatory studies are required before any widespread modification of current clinical practice. In premenopausal patients with tumors expressing some ER, gains from early initiation are unlikely to be clinically significant.

Efficacy of pamidronate in breast cancer with bone metastases: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of pamidronate 60 mg i.v. q 4 weeks in women with advanced breast cancer with skeletal metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 404 woman with skeletal metastases from breast cancer in Sweden and Norway were included in a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Except for the study medication, other palliative treatment was chosen at the discretion of the physician. Skeletal related events, i.e. increased pain, treatment of hypercalcemia, pathologic fractures of long bones or pelvis, paralyses due to vertebral compression, palliative radiotherapy for skeletal metastases, surgery on bone and change of antitumor therapy were recorded every third month as well as a self-estimated pain-score using visual Analog Scales and analgesic consumption. RESULTS: There was a significantly increased time to progression of pain (p < 0.01), to hypercalcemic events (p < 0.05) as well as for the cumulative number of skeletal related events (p < 0.01) in favor for the pamidronate group. No statistically significant reduction of pathologic fractures of long bones or pelvis, or pareses due to vertebral compression occurred. No statistically significant differences were found for the need of radiotherapy and surgery on bone. The pamidronate group faired better regarding performance status (p < 0.05). There was a statistically not significant lower consumption of opioid analgesics in the pamidronate group (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Pamidronate 60 mg i.v. q 4 weeks reduces skeletal events and improves the quality of life in women with bone metastases from breast cancer.

The importance of the histologic grade of invasive breast carcinoma and response to chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Histologic grade is well recognized for its prognostic significance in cases of primary operable invasive breast carcinoma; however, the majority of studies in which grade has been assessed have been based on single-center trials. In addition, the role of grade in predicting response to chemotherapy has not been examined in many previous studies. METHODS: The authors assessed the value of Nottingham histologic grade (NHG) in a group of 465 patients enrolled in a multicenter, randomized International Breast Cancer Study Group clinical trial of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with lymph node (LN) positive and LN negative primary breast carcinoma (formerly named Ludwig Trial V). RESULTS: NHG was a predictor of overall survival for both LN negative and LN positive patients (P=0.045 and P < 0.001, respectively). NHG was associated with a poorer prognosis for both LN positive and LN negative patients, with hazard ratios of 1.651 (P < 0.001) and 1.437 (P=0.045), respectively, for an increase of one grade. Among LN negative patients, this survival disadvantage was observed only for those who received perioperative chemotherapy. For LN positive patients, an increase of one grade resulted in a significant overall survival disadvantage regardless of whether prolonged or perioperative chemotherapy was given. For LN negative patients grouped by grade, there was no observed difference in overall or disease free survival according to whether perioperative chemotherapy or no adjuvant therapy was given. However, LN positive patients with Grade 3 tumors had a significantly greater overall and disease free survival benefit from prolonged chemotherapy than from perioperative chemotherapy (P=0.016 and P=0.013, respectively); LN positive patients with Grade 1 or 2 disease in both treatment arms had comparable overall and disease free survival. A strong correlation between the previously utilized Bloom-Richardson grading system (BRG) and NHG was observed (P < 0.001 and kappa=82%) and no apparent differences in overall and disease free survival were observed between the two systems. NHG did, however, identify a greater proportion of tumors as Grade 1, and BRG identified a greater proportion of breast carcinomas as Grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter clinical study confirms the value of histologic grade, and the authors propose that this technique be used to identify Grade 3, LN positive patients who will benefit from prolonged rather than perioperative chemotherapy.

Factors affecting baseline quality of life in two international adjuvant breast cancer trials. International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG).

Quality of life (QL) is used to assess treatments in clinical trials but may be influenced by other factors. We analysed the impact of biomedical, sociodemographic and cultural factors on baseline QL indicators in two International Breast Cancer Study Group trials. Patients with stage II breast cancer were randomized within 6 weeks of primary surgery to various adjuvant treatments. They were asked to assess five indicators of QL at baseline. QL forms were available for 1231 (83%) of the 1475 premenopausal and 989 (82%) of the 1212 post-menopausal patients, who were from nine countries and spoke seven languages. Culture (defined as language/country groups) had a statistically significant impact on baseline QL measures. Premenopausal patients with poor prognostic factors showed a tendency to report worse QL, with oestrogen receptor status as an independent predictor for mood (P = 0.0005). Older post-menopausal patients reported better emotional wellbeing (P = 0.002), mood (P = 0.002), and less effort to cope (P = 0.0009) compared with younger post-menopausal patients. Co-morbidity, type of surgery, treatment assignment and sociodemographic factors showed a statistically significant impact in post-menopausal patients only. Cultural and biomedical factors influenced baseline QL and should be considered when evaluating the impact of treatment on QL in international breast cancer clinical trials.

Prognostic impact of amenorrhoea after adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients with axillary node involvement: results of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial VI.

Adjuvant chemotherapy-induced amenorrhoea has been shown to be associated with reduced relapses and improved survival for premenopausal breast cancer patients. Amenorrhoea was, therefore, studied to define features of chemotherapy (i.e. duration and timing) and disease-related factors which are associated with its treatment effects. We reviewed data from IBCSG Trial VI, in which accrual was between July 1986 and April 1993. 1196 of the 1475 eligible patients (81%) were evaluable for this analysis. The median follow-up was 60 months. Women who experienced amenorrhoea had a significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) than those who did not (P = 0.0004), although the magnitude of the effect was reduced when adjusted for other prognostic factors (P = 0.09). The largest treatment effect associated with amenorrhoea was seen in patients assigned to receive only three initial CMF courses (5-yr DFS: 67% versus 49%, no amenorrhoea; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.81; P = 0.002). DFS differences between amenorrhoea categories were larger for patients with ER/PR positive tumours (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.80; P = 0.0001). Furthermore, patients whose menses returned after brief amenorrhoea had a DFS similar to those whose menses ceased and did not recover (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.62; P = 0.63). The effects associated with a permanent or temporary chemotherapy-induced amenorrhoea are especially significant for node-positive breast cancer patients who receive a suboptimal duration of CMF chemotherapy. Cessation of menses, even for a limited time period after diagnosis of breast cancer, might be beneficial and should be prospectively investigated, especially in patients with oestrogen receptor-positive primaries.

Dose-response effect of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

There is evidence in the literature of a relationship between dose and response to adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, although published results are conflicting. We therefore retrospectively analysed the role of dose response in patients included in four adjuvant trials of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG, formerly the Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group (trials I, II, III and V), all using 'classical' cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). A total of 1385 node-positive patients were treated with oral cyclophosphamide, and intravenous methotrexate plus 5-fluorouracil (CMF) for at least six 4 week courses. 1350 of these were included in 6 month landmark treatment outcome analyses. A total of 1029 patients were premenopausal, 321 were postmenopausal; 800 had one to three and 550 more than three involved axillary nodes at surgery. The median follow-up ranged from 12 years for trial V to 15 years for trials I-III. Patients were grouped according to three prospectively defined dose levels based on the percentage of the protocol prescribed dose that was actually administered (level I > or = 85%, level II 65-84%, level III < 65%). Patients who received dose level II had a higher disease-free (P = 0.07) and overall survival (P = 0.03) than those who received a higher (level I) or lower (level III) percentage. The 10 year overall survival was 60% for dose level II, 56% for dose level I, 51% for dose level III. The results were generally consistent within trial, menopausal status, and oestrogen receptor status groups. The results within nodal groups showed a large difference among the dose levels for the group with one to three positive nodes (P = 0.02), but no difference for the group with four or more positive nodes. Our results indicate that the dose-response effect remains a crucial factor in adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer. Reductions larger than 35% in the dose administered of oral CMF adversely influenced the outcome of breast cancer patients and should be avoided. The better outcome of the intermediate dose group indicates the need to investigate other aspects involved in the cytotoxicity of adjuvant CMF chemotherapy.

The Gothenburg breast screening trial: first results on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39-49 years at randomization.

BACKGROUND: The effect of mammography screening on breast carcinoma mortality in women ages < 50 years remains unclear. METHODS: A randomized trial of invitation to breast carcinoma screening with mammography was performed in the city of Gothenburg, Sweden. The purpose was to estimate the effect of mammographic screening on breast carcinoma mortality in women ages < 50 years. Randomization was initially by day-of-birth cluster (18% of subjects), and subsequently by individual (82% of subjects). Between September 1983 and April 1984, 11,724 women ages 39-49 years were randomized to the study group. This group was invited to mammographic screening every 18 months. Two-view mammography was used at each screen unless the density of the breast at the previous screen indicated that single view was adequate. Fourteen thousand two hundred and seventeen women in the same age range were randomized to a control group that was not invited to undergo screening until the fifth screen of the study group (between 6 and 7 years after randomization). Women with breast carcinoma diagnosed up to the time immediately after the first screen of the control group were followed for death from breast carcinoma until the end of December 1994. RESULTS: A 45% reduction in mortality from breast carcinoma was observed in the study group compared with the control group (relative risk [RR] = 0.55, P = 0.035, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.96). A conservative estimate based on removal of the tumors detected at the first screen of the control group gave a mortality reduction of 44% (RR = 0.56, P = 0.046, 95% CI, 0.31-0.99). In both cases, the effect was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Mammographic screening can reduce mortality from breast carcinoma in women ages < 50 years. The mortality reduction can be substantial if high quality mammography is used and an 18-month interscreening interval is strictly adhered to.

Quality of life assessment in patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: the IBCSG approach. The International Breast Cancer Study Group.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) has developed and approach for assessing the impact of adjuvant therapy on quality of life (QL) within the framework of international, multilingual clinical trials. The major steps are summarized. Conceptual, methodological and practical issues are discussed with reference to results of two trials closed to accrual (IBCSG VI, VII) and one subsequent ongoing trial (IBCSG IX). PATIENTS AND METHODS: QL was assessed in pre- and post-menopausal patients with operable breast cancer. Various single-item linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) scales were used as indicators of components of QL, including global indicators of well-being, functioning and health perception, and specific indicators of symptoms of disease and treatment. In trials VI and VII, QL was assessed at baseline, during adjuvant treatment and follow-up, and at recurrence. Based on this experience, the QL form was revised for subsequent trials and further investigated in a subsample of patients randomized into trial IX. RESULTS: In trials VI and VII, the QL indicators were responsive to the impact of biomedical factors at baseline, various adjuvant treatments, changes over the first 18 months, and recurrence. In trial IX, the revised QL form was well accepted by patients and staff. Completing this form did not exceed five minutes. QL differences between on and off cytotoxic treatment strengthen the claim that these measures are responsive. Correlations and logistic regression analyses show the expected relationship among the various global and specific indicators. CONCLUSION: Results from two trials closed to accrual and an ongoing trial confirm the feasibility, validity and clinical relevance of the IBCSG approach for studying the impact of adjuvant breast cancer therapy on QL in international clinical trials.

Menstrual cycle and timing of breast surgery in premenopausal node-positive breast cancer: results of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial VI.

PURPOSE: It has been postulated that breast cancer surgery performed during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle is associated with poorer outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We tested this hypothesis by evaluating disease-free survival (DFS) for 1033 premenopausal patients who received definitive surgery either during the follicular phase (n = 358) or the luteal phase (n = 675). All patients were enrolled in a randomized trial conducted between July 1986 and April 1993. All had node positive breast cancer and randomization was stratified by estrogen receptor (ER) status. All patients received at least three cycles of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). The median follow-up was 60 months. RESULTS: Patients who underwent definitive surgery for breast cancer in the follicular phase had a slightly worse disease-free survival than those operated on during the luteal phase (five-year DFS percentage: 53% versus 58%; hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.94-1.38; P = 0.20). The effect was significantly greater for the subpopulation of 300 patients with ER-negative primaries (P = 0.02 interaction effect; five-year DFS percentages 42% vs. 59%; hazard ratio 1.60; 95% CI, 1.12-2.25; P = 0.008). The effect of timing of surgery diminished for analyses based on lesser surgical procedures, e.g., excisional biopsies. In particular, no effect of timing was observed for fine needle aspiration procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical procedures which are more extensive than a fine needle aspiration biopsy might be associated with worse prognosis if conducted during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. This phenomenon was seen predominantly for high risk breast cancer with low levels or no estrogen receptors in the primary tumor.

Prognostic importance of thymidylate synthase expression in early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the prognostic importance of thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in breast tumors of patients with early-stage breast cancer, and to determine whether the benefit of chemotherapy (CT) is associated with TS expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The level of TS expression was evaluated in 210 node-negative and 278 node-positive patients enrolled onto Trial V of the International Breast Cancer Study Group ([IBCSG] formerly the Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group) with a median follow-up time of 8.5 years. TS expression was assessed using the immunohistochemical method with the monoclonal antibody TS 106 on paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. RESULTS: High TS expression was associated with a significantly worse prognosis in node-positive but not in node-negative breast cancer patients. Twenty-seven percent of node-positive patients with high TS expression were disease-free at 10 years, compared with 44% of node-positive patients with low TS expression (P = .03). Forty-one percent of patients with node-positive high-TS-expressing tumors were alive after 10 years, compared with 49% of those with low TS expression (P = .06). The association between TS and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was independent of other prognostic factors such as tumor size, tumor grade, nodal status, vessel invasion, estrogen receptor (ER)/ progestin receptor (PR) status, c-erb B-2, or Ki-67 expression. In node-positive patients, six cycles of standard adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil ([5-FU] CMF) CT improved DFS and OS compared with one cycle of perioperative CMF therapy. The magnitude of this benefit was greatest in patients whose tumors had high TS expression (P < .01 for DFS; P < .01 for OS). Node-negative patients demonstrated no difference in outcome to CT based on TS expression; however, the power to detect differences was limited by the small number of events in this group. CONCLUSION: In early-stage breast cancer, high TS expression is associated with a significantly worse prognosis in node-positive patients. Node-positive patients with high TS levels demonstrate the most significant improvement in DFS and OS when treated with six cycles of conventional adjuvant CMF therapy.