"If the glove fits": Hospital-wide universal gloving is associated with improved hand hygiene and may reduce Clostridioides difficile infection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a hospital-wide universal gloving program resulted in increased hand hygiene compliance and reduced inpatient Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) rates. DESIGN: We carried out a multiple-year before-and-after quasi-experimental quality improvement study. Gloving and hand hygiene compliance data as well as hospital-acquired infection rates were prospectively collected from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017, by secret monitors. SETTINGS: The University of Rochester Strong Memorial Hospital, an 849-bed quaternary-care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All adult inpatients with the exception of patients in the obstetrics unit. INTERVENTIONS: A hospital-wide universal gloving protocol was initiated on January 1, 2016. RESULTS: Hand hygiene compliance increased from 68% in 2015 reaching an average of 88% by 2017 (P < .0002). A 10% increase in gloving per unit was associated with a 1.13-fold increase in the odds of hand hygiene (95% credible interval, 1.12-1.14). The rates of CDI decreased from 1.05 infections per 1,000 patient days in 2015 to 0.74 in 2017 (P < .04). CONCLUSION: A universal gloving initiative was associated with a statistically significant increase in both gloving and hand hygiene compliance. CDI rates decreased during this intervention.

The effect of nonteaching services on the distribution of inpatient cases for internal medicine residents.

PURPOSE: Nonteaching services (NTSs) are becoming increasingly prevalent in academic hospitals. This study was designed to determine whether the presence of an NTS is associated with higher acuity and altered case mix on the teaching service. METHOD: The authors carried out a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of data about all general medical admissions between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2005 to either of two teaching hospitals in Rochester, New York. A total of 6,907 inpatients were studied, of whom 1,976 (29%) were admitted to medicine resident services and 4,931 (71%) were admitted to NTSs. Hospital billing databases were used to determine patient demographics, ICD-9 diagnoses, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, and patient disposition. RESULTS: Compared with NTS patients, patients on resident services had higher median Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (3.0 versus 2.0, P < .001) and numbers of comorbidities (9.0 versus 8.0, P < .001) and were more likely to require intensive care (15.5% versus 7.6%, P < .001) and to die in the hospital (8.2% versus 4.5%, P < .001). Patients on the resident services were more likely to have acute renal failure, respiratory failure, septicemia, and HIV. Residents were less likely to care for patients with primary diagnoses of chest pain, cellulitis, alcohol withdrawal, and sickle cell crisis. The differences in patients' conditions between resident services and NTSs were similar in the two hospitals and also among patients who had not received intensive care. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on resident services may be more medically complex and more likely to have high-acuity diagnoses than patients on NTSs. How these differences affect residents' education, residents' career decisions, and practice styles deserves further study.