Cardio- and cerebrovascular safety of indacaterol vs formoterol, salmeterol, tiotropium and placebo in COPD.

PURPOSE: As COPD patients commonly suffer cardio- and cerebrovascular (CCV) co-morbidities, our purpose was to establish the CCV safety profile of indacaterol, a novel, inhaled, long-acting ß(2)-agonist for COPD. METHODS: The indacaterol clinical trial database comprised 4635 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD enrolled into studies of ≥6 months' duration treated with indacaterol, placebo or other bronchodilators (formoterol, salmeterol, tiotropium). Adverse events (AEs) were analysed overall and according to Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration (APTC) criteria and baseline cardiovascular risk factors. A subset of patients had Holter monitoring. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, indacaterol did not increase the risk of CCV AEs; relative risks were not significantly different for indacaterol versus other treatments. In all treatment groups, including placebo, most CCV AEs occurred in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors. The risk of APTC events (e.g. myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular-related death) was not significantly increased for indacaterol versus placebo. The incidence of notable QTc interval increases >60 ms was low with all active treatments (0-0.5%, versus 0.3% with placebo). Holter monitoring in the subset of patients receiving indacaterol, tiotropium or placebo showed no clinically relevant effect of indacaterol or tiotropium relative to placebo on the development of arrhythmias. The number of deaths adjusted for exposure was lower with all active treatments than with placebo, with a trend to reduced risk with indacaterol (relative risk 0.30, p = 0.054). CONCLUSION: The overall CCV safety profile of indacaterol was similar to placebo and comparable with other long-acting bronchodilators, providing reassurance for regular long-term use of indacaterol in COPD. Data for this analysis were pooled from three studies, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as: NCT00393458, NCT00463567 and NCT00567996.

Efficacy of tegaserod in chronic constipation in men.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic constipation/idiopathic constipation is highly prevalent in western countries and traditional treatments are suboptimal. This multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tegaserod, a selective 5-HT(4) agonist and promotility agent, in men with chronic constipation. METHODS: After screening and baseline phases, men with chronic constipation were randomized to receive either tegaserod 6 mg twice daily or placebo in a double-blind manner for 12 wk. Patients recorded symptoms using a diary. Primary efficacy variable was the response rate for an increase in complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) during the first 4 wk of double-blind treatment. Other efficacy measures included patient assessment of symptoms and satisfaction with symptom relief. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 322 patients were randomized to tegaserod (N = 158) or placebo (N = 164). Increases of at least one CSBM per wk during the first 4 wk of treatment observed for tegaserod compared with placebo (40.5%vs 29.3%, P= 0.03) were sustained throughout the 12-wk treatment period. Response rate for CSBM was also superior for tegaserod (P= 0.04 vs placebo) over the treatment period. Benefits for tegaserod over placebo were also observed for some secondary efficacy variables, however, statistical significance was not achieved at all weeks. Frequency of adverse events was similar with tegaserod and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Tegaserod 6 mg twice daily was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of chronic constipation in men. Tegaserod provided rapid relief of constipation within 1 wk and the effects were sustained for up to 12 wk.

Tegaserod does not alter fasting or meal-induced biliary tract motility.

OBJECTIVE: Tegaserod is a 5-HT(4) receptor partial agonist that increases peristaltic activity of the intestinal tract. It is approved for the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). IBS is a chronic gastrointestinal disorder of function that is reported to be associated with an increased incidence of abdominal surgery including cholecystectomy. The effect of tegaserod on nongut digestive organs, such as the gallbladder and biliary tract, has not been previously investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of tegaserod on gallbladder contractility and on functional status of the sphincter of Oddi during both the interdigestive and the digestive periods in healthy female subjects and in female patients with IBS-C. METHODS: During a 6-wk, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, gallbladder contractility and concomitant change in luminal diameter of the common hepatic duct (CHD) and the common bile duct (CBD, both proximal and distal) in response to a standard liquid meal were quantified using real-time ultrasonography. Changes in luminal diameter of the CHD and the CBD were used as a surrogate marker for sphincter of Oddi function. Ultrasound measurements were conducted every 15 min from 45 min before, to 60 min after the test meal to observe the impact of tegaserod on gallbladder volume and any concomitant change in the diameters of the CHD and the CBD that developed in response to gallbladder contraction. The ultrasound measurements of gallbladder contractility, along with the CHD and the CBD diameters, were repeated after each of the two 2-wk periods of treatment with tegaserod or placebo. The recommended dose of tegaserod (6 mg b.i.d.) for IBS-C patients was used in healthy female subjects (n = 13) and female patients with IBS-C (n = 20). Twice this dose (12 mg b.i.d.) was also evaluated in an additional 20 female patients with IBS-C. Statistical evaluations were conducted using a two-sided analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Gallbladder contractility variables including ejection fraction, ejection rate and ejection period, fasting and residual volume, and maximal emptying, were similar after 2 wk of treatment with tegaserod 6 mg b.i.d. and placebo in healthy female subjects and female patients with IBS-C. There were no significant changes in the luminal diameters of the CHD or the CBD after tegaserod compared to placebo in any cohort. Additionally, no significant dilation (> or =7 mm in diameter) of the CHD or CBD was observed during maximal gallbladder emptying. Similar results were also observed when tegaserod was given at 12 mg b.i.d. in patients with IBS-C. Tegaserod treatment had no significant effect on plasma CCK concentration in response to the test meal. No significant abdominal pain or unexpected adverse events were reported during the study. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed no significant pharmacodynamic effect of tegaserod on gallbladder contractility or on CBD and CHD diameters as a surrogate marker of sphincter of Oddi function during both the interdigestive (fasting) and the digestive (postprandial) periods in healthy female subjects and female patients with IBS-C.

Subject's Global Assessment of Relief: an appropriate method to assess the impact of treatment on irritable bowel syndrome-related symptoms in clinical trials.

The lack of validated outcome measures is a key limitation for the evaluation of drug efficacy in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In clinical trials with tegaserod, the Subject's Global Assessment (SGA) of Relief (a global measure that includes overall wellbeing, abdominal pain/discomfort, and bowel function) was used to identify responders. A total of 1680 patients with IBS with constipation were included in two clinical studies comparing tegaserod with placebo. The SGA of Relief was obtained weekly by a single, self-administered question with five possible answers. Responders for the SGA of Relief reported statistically significant (P<.001) and clinically relevant improvements in multiple IBS-related symptoms compared with nonresponders. Response was also associated with a significant improvement in quality of life. The SGA of Relief is reliable as a new outcome measure for assessing response to therapy in IBS patients and has demonstrated responsiveness and reproducibility.