Relative effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive lobular compared with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.

BACKGROUND: Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) have distinct clinical, pathologic, and genomic characteristics. The objective of the current study was to compare the relative impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of patients with ILC versus those with IDC. METHODS: Women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (HER2) -negative, stage I/II IDC and ILC who received endocrine therapy were identified from the 2000 to 2014 California Cancer Registry. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were collected. Ten-year overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards modeling. RESULTS: In total, 32,997 women with IDC and 4638 with ILC were identified. The receipt of chemotherapy significantly decreased during the study for both subtypes. For patients with IDC, the 10-year OS rate was 95% among those who received endocrine therapy alone versus 93% (P < .01) among those who received endocrine therapy plus chemotherapy. For patients with ILC, the 10-year OS rate was 94% among those who received endocrine therapy alone versus 92% (P < .01) among those who received endocrine therapy plus chemotherapy. After adjusting for patient and treatment factors, adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with a decreased 10-year hazard of death for patients with IDC (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.92). In contrast, adjuvant chemotherapy was not independently associated with the adjusted 10-year hazard of death for patients with ILC (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.46). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved OS for patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, stage I/II ILC. Avoidance of ineffective chemotherapy will markedly reduce the adverse effects and economic burden of breast cancer treatment for a large proportion of patients with breast cancer. Cancer 2017;123:3015-21. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Long-term follow-up for melanoma patients: is there any evidence of a benefit?

As the incidence of melanoma and the number of melanoma survivors continues to rise, optimal surveillance strategies are needed that balance the risks and benefits of screening in the context of contemporary resource use. Detection of recurrences has important implications for clinical management. Most current surveillance recommendations for melanoma survivors are based on low-level evidence with wide variations in practice patterns and an unknown clinical impact for the melanoma survivor.

Breast conservation in the setting of contemporary multimodality treatment provides excellent outcomes for patients with occult primary breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate recurrence and survival for patients with occult (T0N+) breast cancer who underwent contemporary treatment, assessing outcomes for breast conservation and mastectomy. METHODS: We performed a single-institution review of women with occult breast cancer presenting with axillary metastasis without identifiable breast tumor or distant metastasis. We excluded patients with tumors in the axillary tail or mastectomy specimen, patients with additional nonbreast cancer diagnoses, and patients with a history of breast cancer. Breast conservation was defined as axillary node dissection with radiation therapy, without breast surgery. We evaluated patient, tumor, treatment, and outcome variables. Patients were assessed for local, regional, and distant recurrences. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients met criteria for occult breast cancer. Most of these patients (77.8 %) had N1 disease. Fifty percent of cancers (n = 18) were estrogen receptor-positive; 12 (33.3 %) were triple-negative. All patients were evaluated with mammography. Thirty-five patients had breast ultrasound (97.2 %) and 33 (91.7 %) had an MRI. Thirty-four patients (94.4 %) were treated with chemotherapy and 33 (91.7 %) with radiotherapy. Twenty-seven patients (75.0 %) were treated with breast conservation. The median follow-up was 64 months. There were no local or regional failures. One distant recurrence occurred >5 years after diagnosis, resulting in a 5-years overall survival rate of 100 %. There were no significant survival differences between patients receiving breast conservation versus mastectomy (p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Breast conservation-performed with contemporary imaging and multimodality treatment-provides excellent local control and survival for women with T0N+ breast cancer and can be safely offered instead of mastectomy.

Endobronchial ultrasonography versus mediastinoscopy: a single-institution cost analysis and waste comparison.

BACKGROUND: Mediastinoscopy (MED) and endobronchial ultrasonography with transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) have similar accuracy for mediastinal lymph node sampling (MLNS). The threatened financial and environmental sustainability of our health care system mandate that surgeons consider cost and environmental impact in clinical decision making of similarly effective procedures. We performed a cost and waste comparison of MED versus EBUS-TBNA for MLNS to raise awareness of the financial and environmental implications of our practices. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of outpatients who underwent MLNS under general anesthesia in the OR with MED or EBUS-TBNA (September 2007 to December 2009). We analyzed direct costs based on hospital charges, calculated expected payment using a decision support model, and profit margins (modeled expected payment-direct costs). Our waste comparison was measured in kilograms of solid waste per case. RESULTS: We performed MLNS in 148 patients (89 EBUS-TBNA, 39 MED, 20 EBUS + MED). Direct costs were lower for MED ($2,356) compared with EBUS-TBNA ($2,503), whereas expected payment was greater (MED, $3,449; EBUS-TBNA, $3,249), resulting in a profit margin that was $347 greater for MED. The amount of solid waste for each MED was 1.8 kg versus 0.5 kg for EBUS-TBNA. CONCLUSIONS: MED costs less than EBUS-TBNA in the OR setting but generates 3.6 times the amount of EBUS-TBNA waste. The cost of EBUS-TBNA may improve by performance in the endoscopy suite, and surgical pack revision could reduce the amount of MED solid waste. This comparison sets the stage for sophistication of our clinical decision making, taking into consideration the major threats to our health care system.

Underuse of trimodality treatment affects survival for patients with inflammatory breast cancer: an analysis of treatment and survival trends from the National Cancer Database.

PURPOSE: To analyze factors that predict the use of trimodality treatment (chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy [RT]) and evaluate the impact that trimodality treatment use has on survival for patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). METHODS: Using the National Cancer Data Base, patients who underwent surgical treatment of nonmetastatic IBC from 1998 to 2010 were identified. We collected demographic, tumor, and treatment data and analyzed treatment and survival trends over time. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine factors predicting treatment and survival. RESULTS: We identified 10,197 patients who fulfilled study criteria. The use of trimodality therapy fluctuated annually (58.4% to 73.4%). Patients who were older, diagnosed earlier in the study period, lived in regions of the country outside of the Midwest, had lower incomes or public insurance, and had a higher comorbid score were significantly less likely to receive trimodality therapy (all P < .05). Five- and 10-year survival rates were highest among patients receiving trimodality treatment (55.4% and 37.3%, respectively) compared with patients who received the combination of surgery plus chemotherapy, surgery plus RT, or surgery alone. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, use of trimodality therapy remained a significant independent predictor of survival. CONCLUSION: Underutilization of trimodality therapy negatively impacted survival for patients with IBC. The use of trimodality therapy increased marginally with time, but there remain significant factors associated with differences in use of trimodality treatment. We have identified specific barriers to care that may be targeted to improve treatment delivery and potentially improve patient outcomes.

Is surveillance imaging effective for detecting surgically treatable recurrences in patients with melanoma? A comparative analysis of stage-specific surveillance strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To guide resource utilization, we aimed to determine the impact of routine surveillance imaging for the detection of melanoma recurrences amenable to surgical resection with curative intent. BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for melanoma surveillance are largely consensus based. METHODS: Using single-institution, patient-level data (n = 1600), transition probabilities were calculated for a Markov model simulating the natural history of patients with stage I-III melanoma. As a base estimate, imaging was assumed to detect regional and distant recurrences of which 80% and 20% could be surgically treated with curative intent, respectively. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for all point estimates. For each disease stage, we calculated the number of surgically treatable regional or distant recurrence detected during 5 years per 10,000 patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scans at 6- or 12-month intervals. The associated positive and negative predictive values and life expectancy were also calculated and compared with clinical examination alone. RESULTS: At 5-year follow-up, CT or PET/CT at 6-month intervals detected surgically treatable regional or distant recurrence in 6.4% of patients with stage I, 18.5% of stage II, and 33.1% of stage III disease; 12-month intervals decreased the rates to 3.0%, 7.9%, and 13.0%, respectively. The high false-positive rates of CT (20%) and PET/CT (9%) resulted in overall low positive predictive values. However, both CT and PET/CT effectively predicted absence of disease. Life-expectancy gains were minimal (≤ 2 months) for all groups. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of routine surveillance imaging for detecting treatable melanoma recurrences is limited. Even in patients with stage III disease, only minimal gains in life expectancy were achieved.

Minimally invasive inguinal lymph node dissection (MILND) for melanoma: experience from two academic centers.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Regional lymph nodes are the most frequent site of spread of metastatic melanoma. Operative intervention remains the only potential for cure, but the reported morbidity rate associated with inguinal lymphadenectomy is approximately 50%. Minimally invasive lymph node dissection (MILND) is an alternative approach to traditional, open inguinal lymph node dissection (OILND). The aim of this study is to evaluate our early experience with MILND and compare this with our OILND experience. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 13 MILND cases performed for melanoma from 2010 to 2012 at two tertiary academic centers. We compared our outcomes with retrospective data collected on 28 OILND cases performed at the same institutions, by the same surgeons, between 2002 and 2011. Patient characteristics, operative outcomes, and 30-day morbidity were evaluated. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar in the two cohorts with no statistically significant differences in patient age, gender, body mass index, or smoking status. MILND required longer operative time (245 vs 138 min, p=0.0003). The wound dehiscence rate (0 vs 14%, p=0.07), hospital readmission rate (7 vs 21%, p=0.25), and hospital length of stay (1 vs 2 days, p=0.01) were all lower in the MILND group. The lymph node count was significantly higher (11 vs 8, p=0.03) for MILND compared with OILND. CONCLUSIONS: MILND for melanoma is a novel alternative to OILND, and our preliminary data suggest that MILND provides an equivalent lymphadenectomy while minimizing the severity of postoperative complications. Further research will need to be conducted to determine if the oncologic outcomes are similar.

Esophageal stenting and radiotherapy: a multimodal approach for the palliation of symptomatic malignant dysphagia.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal stents provide immediate palliation of malignant dysphagia; however, radiotherapy (RT) is a superior long-term option. We review the outcomes of combined esophageal stenting and RT for patients with malignant dysphagia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with esophageal stents placed for palliation of malignant dysphagia from esophageal stricture, esophageal extrinsic compression, or malignant tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). We excluded patients with radiation-induced TEF in the absence of tumor. We analyzed and compared outcomes between patients with no RT, RT before stent placement, and RT after stent placement. RESULTS: We placed stents in 45 patients for esophageal stricture from esophageal cancer (n = 30; 66.7 %), malignant TEF (n = 8; 17.7 %), and esophageal compression from airway, mediastinal, or metastatic malignancies (n = 7; 15.6 %). Twenty patients (44.4 %) had no RT; 25 patients had RT before stent placement (n = 16; 35.6 %), RT after stent placement (n = 8; 17.8 %), or both (n = 1; 2.2 %). Median follow-up was 30 days. Complications requiring stent revision were similar with or without RT. Subjective symptom relief was achieved in 68.9 % of all patients, with no differences noted between groups (p = 0.99). The 30-day mortality was 15.6 %. Patients with RT after stent placement had a longer median survival compared to those without RT (98 vs. 38 days). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal stent placement with RT is a safe approach for malignant dysphagia.

Surgical treatment of lung cancer: predicting postoperative morbidity in the elderly population.

OBJECTIVES: Surgical resection is standard treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer; however, perception of postoperative risk may influence the decision to proceed for elderly patients. With population data, we analyzed postoperative complications and morbidity predictors for older patients undergoing lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: The Surveillance Epidemiology and End-Results-Medicare linked database (2000-2005) identified patients (ages 66-80 years) undergoing lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. We comprehensively evaluated in-hospital postoperative complications (pulmonary, cardiac, infectious, noncardiopulmonary) with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis codes. Logistic regression models were constructed to identify patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics associated with complications. RESULTS: In all, 4171 patients were included, 2329 of whom had 4097 in-hospital postoperative complications (55.8%). Pulmonary complications were most common (n = 1598; 38.3%) followed by cardiac (n = 1020; 24.5%). Complications were significantly associated with age at least 75 years, male sex, higher comorbidity index, larger tumors, and treatment at nonteaching hospitals (P < .05). Patients with complications had a longer median stay (8 days) than patients without (6 days; P < .001). The 30-day mortality was 4.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Population-based analysis demonstrated that perioperative complications after lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in older patients exceeded 50% and were associated with specific patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Better understanding of the impact of these risk factors may facilitate surgical decision making and encourage implementation of more effective perioperative care guidelines for older surgical patients.

Esophageal stents for anastomotic leaks and perforations.

OBJECTIVE: Intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks and perforations are very morbid and challenging problems. Esophageal stents are increasingly playing an integral role in the management of these patients. Our objective was to report our experience with esophageal stent placement for anastomotic leaks and perforations and to provide a treatment algorithm. METHODS: We performed a review of patients with stent placement for esophagogastric anastomotic leaks or esophageal perforation from March 2005 to August 2009. A prospective database was used to collect data. Success was defined as endoscopic defect closure, negative esophagram, and resumption of oral intake. Failure was defined as no change in leak size or clinical signs of ongoing infection. We collected and analyzed patient demographics, diagnosis, clinical history, and poststent outcomes using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients underwent esophageal stent placement for anastomotic leaks (n = 22) and perforations (n = 15). The median time from original procedure to diagnosis of leak or perforation was 6 days (0-420 days). Nineteen patients (51%) had 21 associated procedures for source control. We placed 94 stents (mean = 2.7 stents/patient); 16 patients (43%) required more than 1 stenting procedure (mean = 1.8 procedures/patient). The median time to restoration of esophageal integrity was 33 days (7-120 days). There were 22 successes (59%); 2 failures were secondary to undrained abscess. Only 2 failures occurred in the last 15 patients (88% success). Strictures did not develop in any patients. Serious complications occurred in 3 patients (stent erosion, leak enlargement, fatal gastroaortic fistula). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal stents can potentially play an integral role in the management of anastomotic leaks and perforations. Success depends on appropriate procedures for source control and surgeon experience.

The long-term impact of surgical complications after resection of stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer: a population-based survival analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical morbidity may influence long-term cancer survival. Because resection of early stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is primary therapy, we sought to determine the survival impact of surgical complications for elderly patients undergoing resection of stage I NSCLC. METHODS: Using the linked Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database (2000-2005), we identified elderly patients who underwent lobectomy for stage I NSCLC. We then assessed the unadjusted association between in-hospital, postoperative complications, and long-term survival for patients who survived more than 30 days after resection using the Kaplan-Meier method. Finally, we used Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the relationship between postoperative complications and 5-year cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) after adjusting for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 3996 eligible patients. The overall in-hospital, postoperative complication rate was 54.2%. Pulmonary complications were the most common (n = 1464) followed by cardiac (n = 916). Unadjusted 5-year CSS was significantly worse for those who had an in-hospital, postoperative complication (70.9%) compared to those who did not (78.9%, P < 0.001). OS was also significantly worse (P < 0.001) for patients who developed a complication. Complications continued to predict worse 5-year CSS and OS after adjusting for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics (HR: 1.38, 95% CI, 1.17-1.64). CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of in-hospital postoperative complications was an independent predictor of worse 5-year CSS after resection of stage I NSCLC. Importantly, the impact of surgical complications extends well after the initial perioperative period. These findings may help identify important targets for best practice guidelines and quality-of-care measures.

Preoperative risk assessment among women undergoing bilateral prophylactic mastectomy for cancer risk reduction.

BACKGROUND: Cancer risk assessment is an important decision-making tool for women considering irreversible risk-reducing surgery. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of BRCA testing among women undergoing bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) and to review the characteristics of women who choose BPM within a metropolitan setting. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of women who underwent BPM in the absence of cancer within 2 health care systems that included 5 metropolitan hospitals. Women with invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were excluded; neither lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) nor atypical hyperplasia (AH) were exclusion criteria. We collected demographic information and preoperative screening and risk assessment, BRCA testing, reconstruction, and associated cancer risk-reducing surgery data. We compared women who underwent BRCA testing to those not tested. RESULTS: From January 2002 to July 2009, a total of 71 BPMs were performed. Only 25 women (35.2%) had preoperative BRCA testing; 88% had a BRCA mutation. Compared with tested women, BRCA nontested women were significantly older (39.1 vs. 49.2 years, P < 0.001), had significantly more preoperative biopsies and mammograms and had fewer previous or simultaneous cancer risk-reducing surgery (oophorectomy). Among BRCA nontested women, common indications for BPM were family history of breast cancer (n = 21, 45.6%) or LCIS or AH (n = 16, 34.8%); 9 nontested women (19.6%) chose BPM based on exclusively on cancer-risk anxiety or personal preference. CONCLUSION: Most women who underwent BPM did not receive preoperative genetic testing. Further studies are needed to corroborate our findings in other geographic regions and practice settings.

Trends in the local treatment of breast cancer: should we be worried?

The overall rates of BCS have remained stable or slightly increased over the past decade in the United States. The CPM rates have markedly increased while unilateral mastectomy rates have decreased. Increasingly, more women are not receiving RT after BCS, particularly high-risk women. These trends have important potential untoward consequences. Strategies are being developed to ensure adequate local therapy for breast cancer patients.

Severe electrolyte disturbances after hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: oxaliplatin versus mitomycin C.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin (OX) is increasingly used for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPC) for patients with peritoneal metastases. Our aim was to review electrolyte disturbances and complications after HIPC with oxaliplatin (OX) versus mitomycin C (MMC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients enrolled in single-institution prospective clinical trials who underwent cytoreductive surgery and HIPC with MMC or OX. We reviewed patient demographics, pathology, perioperative course, HIPC administration, and postoperative electrolyte disturbances. Measured postoperative sodium values were corrected for systemic hyperglycemia using the formula: (measured Na(+)) × [(glucose - 100/100) × 1.6]. RESULTS: From January 2002 to April 2009 we performed 80 HIPC procedures. A total of 60 patients (75%) received MMC (dose range 12.5-50 mg/m(2)) carried in lactated ringers solution. There were 20 patients (25%) who received OX (dose range 300 × 400 mg/m(2)) carried in 5% dextrose solution. For patients receiving HIPC with OX, electrolyte disturbances were the most common complication. Compared with MMC, patients receiving OX had significant 24-h postoperative uncorrected hyponatremia (P < 0.001), corrected hyponatremia (P < 0.001), hyperglycemia (P < 0.001), and metabolic acidosis (P < 0.001). In the OX group, corrected (mean 130.5) and uncorrected (mean 127.4) sodium levels were significantly lower than preoperatively (mean 139.9, P < 0.001). The overall nonelectrolyte complication rate was 56.2%. (MMC n = 33, 55.0%; OX n = 12, 60%); the 30-day mortality rate was 0% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with MMC, HIPC with OX was associated with significant but predictable electrolyte disturbances; however, these electrolyte disturbances were not associated with higher overall complication rates. Close monitoring with early correction is imperative to maximize perioperative care. Further studies are needed to provide mechanistic insight.

Gastric Outlet Obstruction Palliation: A Novel Stent-Based Solution.

Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) after esophagectomy is a morbid outcome and significantly hinders quality of life for end-stage esophageal cancer patients. In the pre-stent era, palliation consisted of chemotherapy, radiation, tumor ablation, or stricture dilation. In the current era, palliative stenting has emerged as an additional tool; however, migration and tumor ingrowth are ongoing challenges. To mitigate these challenges, we developed a novel, hybrid, stent-based approach for the palliative management of GOO. We present a patient with esophageal cancer diagnosed with recurrent, metastatic disease 1 year after esophagectomy. She developed dehydration and intractable emesis, which significantly interfered with her quality of life. For palliation, we dilated the stenosis and proceeded with our stent-based solution. Using a combined endoscopic and fluoroscopic approach, we placed a 12-mm silicone salivary bypass tube across the pylorus, where it kinked slightly because of local tumor biology. To bridge this defect and ensure luminal patency, we placed a nitinol tracheobronchial stent through the silicone stent. Clinically, the patient had immediate relief from her pre-operative symptoms and was discharged home on a liquid diet. In conclusion, GOO and malignant dysphagia after esophagectomy are significant challenges for patients with end-stage disease. Palliative stenting is a viable option, but migration and tumor ingrowth are common complications. The hybrid approach presented here provides a unique solution to these potential pitfalls. The flared silicone tube minimized the chance of migration and impaired tumor ingrowth. The nitinol stent aided with patency and overcame the challenges of the soft tube. This novel strategy achieved palliation, describing another endoscopic option in the treatment of malignant GOO.

Conditional cancer-specific versus cardiovascular-specific survival after lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Conditional cancer-specific survival rates account for changes in the risk of death from cancer over time. There may be a point during follow-up when patients who undergo lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are as likely to die of cardiovascular disease as of cancer. METHODS: Using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Database (1988 through 2005), we identified patients 50 years old and older who underwent lobectomy for stage I NSCLC. We used competing risks methods to calculate conditional survival rates and to ascertain if there is a point in follow-up where the risk of dying of cancer is equivalent to the risk of dying of cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: In all, 22,518 patients met our inclusion criteria. The difference in the 5-year conditional probability of dying of cancer and the 5-year conditional probability of dying of cardiovascular disease decreased with time; in the whole cohort, these probabilities were equivalent if patients survived to 7 years after lobectomy (p = 0.11). With increasing age, the probability of dying of cancer and the probability of dying of cardiovascular disease became equivalent at earlier time points. Furthermore, the 5-year probability of dying of cardiovascular disease was significantly greater than the 5-year probability of dying of cancer for patients aged 70 to 79 years who survived to 7 years and for patients aged 80 years and older who survived to 5 years after lobectomy. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing lobectomy for stage I NSCLC, cardiovascular-specific mortality becomes increasingly important over the course of follow-up, especially among elderly patients.

The effectiveness of the "open chest" for the unstable patient after bilateral sequential lung transplantation.

Respiratory or hemodynamic instability after lung transplantation is one of the most challenging experiences a lung transplant surgeon and anesthesiologist face. We used an "open chest" approach as a feasible modality for managing these difficult patients. In this single-institution review of patients managed with this technique, we report the criteria for consideration, technical aspects, and overall effectiveness of this peri-operative strategy.

Is VATS lobectomy better: perioperatively, biologically and oncologically?

The current review focuses on a clinical comparison of lobectomy by means of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open lobectomy. The best available evidence strongly suggests that VATS lobectomy is less morbid than open lobectomy, and that VATS lobectomy is less immunosuppressive and elicits a milder inflammatory response than open lobectomy. Midterm to long-term oncologic results of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer appear to be equivalent for VATS and open lobectomy. Because a large, prospective, randomized, multiinstitutional trial of open versus VATS lobectomy will likely never take place, we are dependent on the summarized information to draw practical conclusions.

Pharyngostomy tubes for gastric conduit decompression.

OBJECTIVE: This article illustrates our operative technique for pharyngostomy tube placement and describes our clinical experience with pharyngostomy use for gastric conduit decompression after esophagectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing pharyngostomy tube placement for gastric conduit decompression after esophagectomy from January 2008 to August 2009. Patients were included if they had a pharyngostomy tube placed at esophagectomy (prophylactic placement) or as a means of decompression after postesophagectomy anastomotic leak (therapeutic placement). We collected operative and clinical data and performed a descriptive statistical analysis. RESULTS: We placed 25 pharyngostomy tubes for gastric conduit decompression after esophagectomy. Eleven were placed prophylactically (44%); the remaining 14 were placed therapeutically (56%) after anastomotic leak. Prophylactic pharyngostomy tubes remained in place a median of 8 days (range 4-17 days), whereas therapeutic pharyngostomy tubes were left in place a median of 15 days (range 7-125 days). There were 4 infectious complications (16%) unrelated to length of pharyngostomy use: 2 cases of cellulitis (resolved with antibiotics, tube remaining in place) and 2 superficial abscesses after tube removal requiring bedside débridement. Seventy-two percent of patients underwent swallow evaluation; 22% of these patients had radiographic evidence of aspiration. CONCLUSIONS: Pharyngostomy tube placement for gastric conduit decompression after esophagectomy is simple, and tubes can stay in place for prolonged periods. Our experience suggests that pharyngostomy tubes are a safe alternative to nasogastric drainage.