Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 15(10): e0240314, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33057439

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDRGN) are found with rising prevalence in non-hemodialysis risk populations as well as hemodialysis (HD) cohorts in Asia, Europe and North America. At the same time, colonization and consecutive infections with such pathogens may increase mortality and morbidity of affected individuals. We aimed to monitor intestinal MDRGN colonization in a yet not investigated German HD population. METHODS: We performed cross-sectional point-prevalence testing with 12 months follow-up and selected testing of relatives in an out-patient HD cohort of n = 77 patients by using microbiological cultures from fresh stool samples, combined with Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. RESULTS: We detected MDRGN in 8 out of 77 patients (10.4%) and 1 out of 22 relatives (4.5%), indicating only colonization and no infections. At follow-up, 2 patients showed phenotypic persistence of MDRGN colonization, and in 6 other patients de-novo MDRGN colonization could be demonstrated. Pathogens included Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase [ESBL]-production as well as fluoroquinolone resistance), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Enterobacter cloacae. CONCLUSIONS: In a single-center study, MDRGN colonization rates were below those found in non-HD high-risk populations and HD units in the US, respectively. Reasons for this could be high hygiene standards and a strict antibiotic stewardship policy with evidence of low consumption of fluoroquinolones and carbapenems in our HD unit and the affiliated hospital.


Subject(s)
Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/pathology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/drug effects , Feces/microbiology , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology , Germany , Gram-Negative Bacteria/chemistry , Gram-Negative Bacteria/metabolism , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Hospitals , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Renal Dialysis , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization , beta-Lactamases/metabolism
2.
Ger Med Sci ; 18: Doc03, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32341686

ABSTRACT

Lyme borreliosis is the most common tick-borne infectious disease in Europe. A neurological manifestation occurs in 3-15% of infections and can manifest as polyradiculitis, meningitis and (rarely) encephalomyelitis. This S3 guideline is directed at physicians in private practices and clinics who treat Lyme neuroborreliosis in children and adults. Twenty AWMF member societies, the Robert Koch Institute, the German Borreliosis Society and three patient organisations participated in its development. A systematic review and assessment of the literature was conducted by the German Cochrane Centre, Freiburg (Cochrane Germany). The main objectives of this guideline are to define the disease and to give recommendations for the confirmation of a clinically suspected diagnosis by laboratory testing, antibiotic therapy, differential diagnostic testing and prevention.


Subject(s)
Borrelia burgdorferi/isolation & purification , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Lyme Neuroborreliosis , Patient Care Management/methods , Post-Lyme Disease Syndrome , Adult , Animals , Child , Diagnosis, Differential , Disease Vectors , Erythema Chronicum Migrans/diagnosis , Erythema Chronicum Migrans/physiopathology , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Lyme Neuroborreliosis/epidemiology , Lyme Neuroborreliosis/microbiology , Lyme Neuroborreliosis/physiopathology , Lyme Neuroborreliosis/therapy , Post-Lyme Disease Syndrome/physiopathology , Post-Lyme Disease Syndrome/therapy , Preventive Health Services
3.
Ger Med Sci ; 15: Doc14, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28943834

ABSTRACT

This guideline of the German Dermatology Society primarily focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous manifestations of Lyme borreliosis. It has received consensus from 22 German medical societies and 2 German patient organisations. It is the first part of an AWMF (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e.V.) interdisciplinary guideline: "Lyme Borreliosis - Diagnosis and Treatment, development stage S3". The guideline is directed at physicians in private practices and clinics who treat Lyme borreliosis. Objectives of this guideline are recommendations for confirming a clinical diagnosis, recommendations for a stage-related laboratory diagnosis (serological detection of IgM and IgG Borrelia antibodies using the 2-tiered ELISA/immunoblot process, sensible use of molecular diagnostic and culture procedures) and recommendations for the treatment of the localised, early-stage infection (erythema migrans, erythema chronicum migrans, and borrelial lymphocytoma), the disseminated early-stage infection (multiple erythemata migrantia, flu-like symptoms) and treatment of the late-stage infection (acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans with and without neurological manifestations). In addition, an information sheet for patients containing recommendations for the prevention of Lyme borreliosis is attached to the guideline.


Subject(s)
Borrelia burgdorferi Group , Lyme Disease/diagnosis , Lyme Disease/drug therapy , Pseudolymphoma/microbiology , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/diagnosis , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/microbiology , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bites and Stings/prevention & control , Borrelia burgdorferi Group/immunology , Diagnosis, Differential , Erythema/diagnosis , Erythema/microbiology , Humans , Ixodes , Joint Diseases/microbiology , Lyme Disease/epidemiology , Lyme Disease/microbiology , Nervous System Diseases/microbiology , Pseudolymphoma/diagnosis , Serologic Tests
4.
Infection ; 45(3): 263-268, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28290130

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: "Choosing Wisely" is a growing international campaign aiming at practice changes to improve patient health and safety by both, conduct of essential and avoidance of unnecessary diagnostic, preventive and therapeutic procedures. The goal is to create an easily recognizable and distributable list ("Choosing Wisely items") that addresses common over- and underuse in the management of infectious diseases. METHODS: The German Society of Infectious Diseases (DGI) participates in the campaign "Klug Entscheiden" by the German Society of Internal Medicine. Committee members of the (DGI) listed potential 'Choosing Wisely items'. Topics were subjected to systematic evidence review and top ten items were selected for appropriateness. Five positive and negative recommendations were approved via individual member vote. RESULTS: The final recommendations are: (1) Imperatively start antimicrobial treatment and remove the focus in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection. (2) Critically ill patients with signs of infection need early appropriate antibiotic therapy. (3) Annual influenza vaccination should be given to individuals with age >60 years, patients with specific co-morbidities and to contact persons who may spread influenza to others. (4) All children should receive measles vaccine. (5) Prefer oral formulations of highly bioavailable antimicrobials whenever possible. (6) Avoid prescribing antibiotics for uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infections. (7) Do not treat asymptomatic bacteriuria with antibiotics. (8) Do not treat Candida detected in respiratory or gastrointestinal tract specimens. (9) Do not prolong prophylactic administration of antibiotics in patients after they have left the operating room. (10) Do not treat an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) or procalcitonin with antibiotics for patients without signs of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians will reduce potential harm to patients and increase the value of health care when implementing these recommendations.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases/diagnosis , Communicable Diseases/therapy , Global Health , Health Promotion , Unnecessary Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Delivery of Health Care , Germany , Humans , Public Health
5.
Eur J Pediatr ; 173(3): 265-76, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23661234

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The burden of influenza is unevenly distributed, with more severe outcomes in children aged <5 years than older children and adults. In spite of this, immunisation policies for young children are far from universal. This article provides an overview of the published evidence on the burden of influenza in children worldwide, with a particular interest in the impact of pandemic influenza in 2009-2010 (caused by the H1N1pdm09 virus). In an average season, up to 9.8 % of 0- to 14-year olds present with influenza, but incidence rates can be markedly higher in younger children. Children aged <5 years have greater rates of hospitalisation and complications than their older counterparts, particularly if the children have co-existing illnesses; historically, this age group have had higher mortality rates from the disease than other children, although during the 2009-2010 pandemic the median age of those who died of influenza was higher than in previous seasons. Admissions to hospital and emergency departments appear to have been more frequent in children with H1N1pdm09 infections than during previous seasonal epidemics, with pneumonia continuing to be a common complication in this setting. Outcomes in children hospitalised with severe disease also seem to have been worse for those infected with H1N1pdm09 viruses compared with seasonal viruses. Studies in children confirm that vaccination reduces the incidence of seasonal influenza and the associated burden, underlining the importance of targeting this group in national immunisation policies. CONCLUSIONS: Children aged <5 years are especially vulnerable to influenza, particularly that caused by seasonal viruses, and vaccination in this group can be an effective strategy for reducing disease burden.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Child , Child Mortality , Child, Preschool , Cost of Illness , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Influenza, Human/mortality
7.
Int J Hyg Environ Health ; 216(6): 751-4, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23517737

ABSTRACT

Colonization with Staphylococci is widely distributed among patients with end-stage renal disease who are receiving hemodialysis (HD). In addition to more intensive care and use of artificial devices, the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization and infection has increased. Such colonization has recently been associated with a more than doubled mortality rate in HD patients. However, it is not clear whether the (presumably increasing) incidence of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) colonization is associated with MRSA and/or morbidity and mortality. We therefore established a screening program in our HD population (n=156) and followed these patients over 10 years. We discovered eighty-eight MSSA-colonized patients and one MRSA-colonized patient by cross-sectional and admission-related screenings between 2000 and 2010. The morbidity and mortality of the HD patients was not related to MSSA colonization. The MSSA colonization rate decreased slightly during the 10-year observation period. We conclude that the incidence of MRSA colonization in our unit was lower compared to that reported in the literature. The reasons for this finding are complex and require further investigation. The incidence of MSSA colonization was frequent but did not impact morbidity or mortality.


Subject(s)
Carrier State , Cross Infection/microbiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development , Renal Dialysis , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Aged , Female , Humans , Incidence , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/mortality
8.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 67(2): 135-42, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20871984

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Physiological changes occurring in patients with diabetes may affect the pharmacokinetics and penetration of antimicrobial agents into peripheral tissue. We examined the pharmacokinetics and the penetration of moxifloxacin into perinecrotic tissue of diabetic foot lesions in patients with diabetic foot infections (DFI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus and hospitalized for DFI (Texas classification of at least B2) were treated with 400 mg moxifloxacin intravenously (IV) or orally (PO) once daily. The pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin and its concentration 3 h after administration in samples of perinecrotic tissue resected from infected diabetic foot wounds were determined at steady state (days 4-8). RESULTS: A total of 53 patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (mean age 69.4 ± 10.8 years) were included in the study, of whom 28 received PO and 25 IV moxifloxacin therapy for a median of 8 days. In the PO and IV subgroups, the mean maximum observed plasma concentration (C (max)) in plasma was 2.69 and 4.77 mg/l at a median of 2 [time to reach C (max) (T (max)) range 1.0-8.0 h] and 1 h after administration, respectively. A mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 until the last quantifiable plasma concentration (AUC(0-24 h)) of 29.36 mg h/l (PO) and 27.09 mg h/l (IV) was achieved. Mean moxifloxacin concentrations in perinecrotic tissue of infected diabetic foot wounds following PO or IV administration were 1.79 ± 0.82 and 2.20 ± 1.54 µg/g, thus exceeding the MIC(90) (minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit growth of 90% of organisms) for Staphylococcus aureus (0.25 mg/l) by seven- and eightfold and the MIC(90) for Escherichia coli (0.06 mg/l) by 29-fold and 36-fold, respectively. The mean tissue-to-plasma ratios of moxifloxacin concentration 3 h after administration were 1.01 ± 0.57 (PO) and 1.09 ± 0.69 (IV). Significant differences between the routes of administration were observed for T (max) and C (max) (P < 0.01), but not for other clinically relevant parameters (AUC(0-24); moxifloxacin DFI tissue concentration). CONCLUSIONS: The plasma concentration-time curve of moxifloxacin in diabetic patients is similar to that of healthy volunteers. We also observed a good penetration of moxifloxacin into inflamed DFI tissue which taken together with the possibility of sequential IV/PO therapy suggest that moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily is a therapeutic option in the treatment of DFI caused by susceptible organisms.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacokinetics , Aza Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetic Foot/metabolism , Quinolines/pharmacokinetics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Aza Compounds/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/metabolism , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Female , Fluoroquinolones , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Moxifloxacin , Prospective Studies , Quinolines/therapeutic use
9.
Clin Infect Dis ; 48(2): 203-12, 2009 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19072714

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) causes substantial morbidity and mortality, but few randomized, controlled studies have been conducted to guide therapeutic interventions. METHODS: To determine whether linezolid would be noninferior to vancomycin in patients with CRBSI, we conducted an open-label, multicenter, comparative study. Patients with suspected CRBSI were randomized to receive linezolid or vancomycin (control group). The primary end point was microbiologic outcome at test of cure 1-2 weeks after treatment, as assessed by step-down procedure. The first analysis population was complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) in patients with suspected CRBSI; patients with CRBSI were analyzed if noninferiority criteria (lower bound of the 95% confidence interval [CI] not outside -15%) were met. RESULTS: Noninferiority criteria were met for cSSSI (microbiologic success rate for linezolid recipients, 89.6% [146 for 163 patients]; for the control group, 89.9% [134 of 149]; 95% CI, -7.1 to 6.4) and CRBSI (for linezolid recipients, 86.3% [82 of 95]; for the control group, 90.5% [67 of 74]; 95% CI, -13.8 to 5.4). The frequency and severity of adverse events were similar between groups. Mortality rates were 10.4% for linezolid recipients (28 of 269 patients) and 10.1% for control subjects (26 of 257) in the modified intent-to-treat population (i.e., all patients with gram-positive baseline culture) through test of cure, and they were 21.5% for linezolid recipients (78 of 363) and 16.0% for the control group (58 of 363; 95% CI, -0.2 to 11.2) for all treated patients through poststudy treatment day 84. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid demonstrated microbiologic success rates noninferior to those for vancomycin in patients with cSSSIs and CRBSIs caused by gram-positive organisms. Patients with catheter-related infections must be carefully investigated for the heterogeneous underlying causes of high morbidity and mortality, particularly for infections with gram-negative organisms.


Subject(s)
Acetamides/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Catheter-Related Infections/drug therapy , Oxazolidinones/therapeutic use , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/drug therapy , Acetamides/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Bacteremia/mortality , Catheter-Related Infections/mortality , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/mortality , Female , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/mortality , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/mortality , Humans , Linezolid , Male , Middle Aged , Oxazolidinones/adverse effects , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/mortality , Vancomycin/adverse effects , Vancomycin/therapeutic use
10.
Med Klin (Munich) ; 103(11): 761-8, 2008 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19165427

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Influenza is a considerable health problem all over the world. Vaccination is the most important measure for preventing influenza and reducing morbidity and mortality. The aims of this study were to assess influenza vaccination coverage from 2001 to 2007 in Germany, to understand motivations and barriers to vaccination, and to identify vaccination intentions for season 2007/08. METHODS: In representative household surveys, 12,039 telephone interviews with individuals aged >or= 14 years were conducted between 2001 and 2007. Essentially the same questionnaire was used in all seasons. RESULTS: In season 2006/07, the overall influenza vaccination coverage rate dropped from 32.5% in the previous season to 27.4%. In the elderly (>or= 60 years), the rate decreased from 51.6% to 44.7% and the odds ratio of being vaccinated, compared to those not belonging to a high-risk group, remained < 5. Chronically ill elderly persons had an odds ratio of vaccination of 7, while younger chronically ill persons and health-care workers had odds ratios of about 2. Perceiving influenza as a serious illness was the most frequent reason for getting vaccinated. 14% of those vaccinated in 2006/07 indicated the threat of avian flu as a reason. The main reason for not getting vaccinated was thinking not to be likely to catch the flu. A recommendation by the family doctor/nurse was perceived as the major encouraging factor for vaccination. A total of 44.7% of the respondents intended to get vaccinated against influenza in 2007/08. CONCLUSION: A trend of increasing vaccination rates was observed from 2001 to 2006 in Germany, but the rates dipped by almost a sixth after 2005/06. The loss of media interest in the threat of avian influenza after February 2006 and stalling reimbursement programs may have contributed to the recent drop in vaccination rates.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccination/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Female , Germany , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Services Accessibility/trends , Health Surveys , Humans , Influenza, Human/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Motivation , Risk Factors , Young Adult
11.
Med Klin (Munich) ; 102(2): 163-7, 2007 Feb 15.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17323024

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are generally rare, but appear more frequently in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Mostly asymptomatic, GIST can also cause relevant clinical appearances such as gastrointestinal bleeding, obstruction, or invagination. In recent years, a significant expert knowledge was gained in biology and treatment of these tumors. CASE REPORT: The case of a 50-year-old man with a history of neurofibromatosis type 1 and acute gastrointestinal bleeding is described. In the index upper endoscopy an ulcerated tumor of the proximal small bowel was found. The histopathologic examination showed a GIST. Segmental small bowel resection was carried out. Over the course of 1 year, there has been no evidence of a recurrence, metastases, or metachronous GIST. CONCLUSION: Considering the distinct biology of GIST in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1, the recommendation for a generous endoscopic examination or a routine endoscopy in this population is discussed.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/diagnosis , Jejunal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/diagnosis , Neurofibromatosis 1/complications , Biopsy , Endoscopy , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/genetics , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/surgery , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Jejunal Neoplasms/genetics , Jejunal Neoplasms/pathology , Jejunal Neoplasms/surgery , Jejunum/pathology , Male , Melena/etiology , Middle Aged , Mutation , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/genetics , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/pathology , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/surgery , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/genetics , Risk Factors , Time Factors
12.
J Med Microbiol ; 54(Pt 2): 149-153, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15673508

ABSTRACT

Antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (AAD) represents a clinical entity leading to prolonged hospital stays and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and results in additional costs. The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence and characteristics of different bacteria in stools of patients with AAD. The reliability of diagnostic procedures under routine conditions was evaluated. Host factors were also analysed. From June 2002 to April 2003 89 cases of diarrhoea were reported at a hospital unit for internal medicine. Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens toxin enzyme-immunoassays (EIAs), and culture for C. difficile, C. perfringens and Staphylococcus aureus were performed on stool samples from all patients. Toxin production was determined in isolated S. aureus strains. In vitro susceptibility of S. aureus for oxacillin and of C. difficile for vancomycin, metronidazole, linezolid, fusidic acid and tetracycline was tested. Host factors, such as age, comorbidities, antibiotic exposure and contact with other patients, were evaluated. Twenty-six stools were positive for C. difficile toxins by an EIA technique, while C. difficile was cultured from 39. C. difficile was isolated from 21 stools that were EIA negative. Additionally, from 28 stools S. aureus and/or C. perfringens could be isolated. Nine samples contained only S. aureus and/or C. perfringens. Thirty-one stools were negative in all tests. All C. difficile isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and metronidazole. Age >60 years, and diseases of the vascular system, the heart, the kidneys and the lungs were identified as risk factors for acquiring C. difficile in this setting (P values < 0.05). Stool culture for C. difficile was shown to be more sensitive than toxin EIA in this study. Risk factors for the acquisition of C. difficile in outbreak situations seem to differ from risk factors in the normal hospital setting. The role of toxin-producing S. aureus in cases of AAD needs further investigation.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Toxins/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Diarrhea/microbiology , Disease Outbreaks , Feces/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Clostridium perfringens/isolation & purification , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Diarrhea/chemically induced , Diarrhea/diagnosis , Enterotoxins/analysis , Feces/chemistry , Humans , Population Surveillance , Prevalence , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
13.
Med Klin (Munich) ; 98(6): 319-25, 2003 Jun 15.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12811416

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a viral disease, observed primarily in Southern China in November 2002, with variable flu-like symptoms and pneumonia, in approx. 5% leading to death from respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The disease was spread over more than 30 states all over the globe by SARS-virus-infected travelers. WHO and CDC received first information about a new syndrome by the end of February 2003, after the first cases outside the Republic of China had been observed. A case in Hanoi, Vietnam, led to the first precise information about the new disease entity to WHO, by Dr. Carlo Urbani, a co-worker of WHO/Doctors without Borders, who had been called by local colleagues to assist in the management of a patient with an unknown severe disease by the end of February 2003. Dr. Urbani died from SARS, as did many other health care workers. In the meantime, more than 7,000 cases have been observed worldwide, predominantly in China and Hong Kong, but also in Taiwan, Canada, Singapore, and the USA, and many other countries, and more than 600 of these patients died from RDS. Since the beginning of March 2003, when WHO and CDC started their activities, in close collaboration with a group of international experts, including the Bernhard-Nocht-Institute in Hamburg and the Department of Virology in Frankfurt/Main, a previously impossible success in the disclosure of the disease was achieved. Within only 8 weeks of research it was possible to describe the infectious agent, a genetically modified coronavirus, including the genetic sequence, to establish specific diagnostic PCR methods and to find possible mechanisms for promising therapeutic approaches. In addition, intensifying classical quarantine and hospital hygiene measures, it was possible to limit SARS in many countries to sporadic cases, and to reduce the disease in countries such as Canada and Vietnam. This review article summarizes important information about many issues of SARS (May 15th, 2003).


Subject(s)
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , Canada/epidemiology , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , China/epidemiology , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Research , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/mortality , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/diagnosis , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/epidemiology , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/mortality , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/therapy , Singapore/epidemiology , Taiwan/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , World Health Organization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...