QF-PCR as a substitute for karyotyping of cytotrophoblast for the analysis of chorionic villi: advantages and limitations from a cytogenetic retrospective audit of 44,727 first-trimester prenatal diagnoses.

OBJECTIVES: Karyotyping on chorionic villous samples (CVS) includes the analysis of both cytotrophoblast (STC) and mesenchyme (LTC). This approach requires complex laboratory organization and trained technicians. The introduction of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) instead of conventional karyotyping in low-risk pregnancies opened its application in CVS analysis. Discordant QF-PCR and CVS cytogenetic results were reported, and strategies for CVS analysis were introduced to minimize this risk. The possibility to substitute the STC with QF-PCR was reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate benefits and limitations of the approach QF-PCR + LTC compared with the traditional method STC + LTC and to quantify the associated risks of false results. METHOD: This study is based on a retrospective cytogenetic audit of CVS results (n = 44 727) generated by the STC + LTC analytic approach. False-negative risks related to true fetal mosaicism type IV, imprinting syndromes and maternal contamination in LTC were calculated. RESULTS: Compared with STC + LTC, QF-PCR + LTC approach is associated with a cumulative false-negative risk of ~1/3100-1/4400. Costs and reporting time of STC in a high-throughput cytogenetic lab are similar to a CE-IVD marked QF-PCR analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These results should be clearly highlighted in the pre-test counseling and extensively discussed with the couple prior to testing for informed consent.

Application of a new molecular technique for the genetic evaluation of products of conception.

OBJECTIVES: Karyotyping is a well-established method of investigating the genetic content of product of conceptions (POCs). Because of the high rate of culture failure and maternal cell contamination, failed results or 46,XX findings are often obtained. Different molecular approaches that are not culture dependent have been proposed to circumvent these limits. On the basis of the robust experience previously obtained with bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs)-on-Beads™ (BoBs™), we evaluated the same technology that we had used for the analysis of prenatal samples on POCs. METHOD: KaryoLite™ BoBs™ includes 91 beads, each of which is conjugated with a composite of multiple neighboring BACs according to the hg19 assembly. It quantifies proximal and terminal regions of each chromosome arm. The study included 376 samples. RESULTS: The failure rate was 2%, and reproducibility >99%; false-positive and false-negative rates were <1% for non-mosaic aneuploidies and imbalances effecting all three BACs in a contig. Detection rate for partial terminal imbalances was 65.5%. The mosaic detection threshold was 50%, and the success rate in macerated samples was 87.8%. The aneuploidy detection rate in samples with cell growth failure was 27.8%, and maternal cell contamination was suspected in 23.1% of 46,XX cultured cells. CONCLUSION: KaryoLite™ BoBs™ as a 'first-tier' test in combination with other approaches showed beneficial, cost-effective and clearly enhanced POC testing.

Chromosome abnormalities investigated by non-invasive prenatal testing account for approximately 50% of fetal unbalances associated with relevant clinical phenotypes.

During the past 20 years non-invasive screening tests have been increasingly utilized in prenatal diagnosis (PD) practice. Considerable effort has been exerted by multicenter consortia to evaluate the reliability of non-invasive screening tests in detecting those women with an increased risk of having a pregnancy affected by trisomies 21, 18, and 13, monosomy X, and triploidies. To what extent this group of abnormal karyotypes accounts for the total number of phenotypically relevant fetal chromosome abnormalities has, however, never been investigated. The present report is an attempt aimed to quantify this proportion. A retrospective analysis of a homogeneous survey of 115,128 consecutive invasive prenatal tests was undertaken. All cases were classified in accordance with the indication given for the invasive testing. Cytogenetic results regarding 96,416 karyotype analyses performed because of advanced maternal age (>or=35 years) or gestational anxiety (<35 years) were considered since these are the patients who usually undergo non-invasive screening tests. We calculated the number of cases (T21, T18, T13, 45,X, and triploidy) that would have been detected by prenatal screening on the basis of the published detection rate of the combined-2 test or the quadruple test. Our findings indicate that the chromosomal abnormalities investigated by screening tests represent <50% of the fetal chromosomal abnormalities associated with an abnormal outcome ranging from intermediate-to-severe in women <35 years (45.8% and 39.6% in the first and second trimesters, respectively), and sensitivity >50% in women >or=35 years (65.1% and 61.8%, respectively). To conclude, approximately 50% of the phenotypically relevant abnormal karyotypes cannot be detected by non-invasive prenatal screening tests.

Quantitative fluorescence-polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of the duplication of the Charcot Marie Tooth disease type 1A critical region.

Charcot Marie Tooth (CMT) syndrome is the most common hereditary peripheral neuropathy, with an incidence of about 1 in 2500. The subtype 1A (CMT1A) is caused by a tandem duplication of a 1.5-Mb region encompassing the PMP22 gene. Conventional short tandem repeat (STR) analysis can reveal this imbalance if a triallelic pattern, defining with certainty the presence of duplication, is present. In case of duplication with a biallelic pattern, it can only indicate a semiquantitative dosage of the fluorescence intensity ratio of the two fragments. In this study we developed a quantitative fluorescence-PCR using seven highly informative STRs within the CMT1A critical region that successfully disclosed or excluded the presence of the pathogenic imbalance in a cohort of 60 samples including 40 DNAs from samples with the CMT1A duplication previously characterized with two different molecular approaches, and 20 diagnostic samples from 10 members of a five-generation pedigree segregating CMT1A, 8 unrelated cases and 2 prenatal samples. The application of the quantitative fluorescence-PCR using STRs located in the critical region could be a reliable method to evaluate the presence of the PMP22 duplication for the diagnosis and classification of hereditary neuropathies in asymptomatic subjects with a family history of inherited neuropathy, in prenatal samples in cases with one affected parent, and in unrelated patients with a sporadic demyelinating neuropathy with clinical features resembling CMT (i.e., pes cavus with hammer toes) or with conduction velocities in the range of CMT1A.