Direct and indirect effects of psychological well-being and therapeutic alliance on therapy outcome in eating disorders.

Introduction: Outcome research in eating disorders (EDs) is commonly focused on psychopathological dysfunction. However, Ryff's model of psychological well-being (PWB) has shown promising-yet preliminary-results with ED patients. Additionally, despite substantial evidence highlighting the association between the therapeutic alliance and treatment outcome, findings in ED samples remain unclear. The present study aimed at exploring the direct effect of PWB dimensions and the early therapeutic alliance on ED patients' individual treatment responses, as well as the mediating role played by the early therapeutic alliance in the relationship between PWB dimensions and overall pre-post symptom change. Methods: A sample of N = 165 ED patients assigned female at birth, who were receiving treatment in a residential program, completed the Psychological Well-Being Scale at treatment intake and the Working Alliance Inventory after the first four psychotherapy sessions. Patients also completed the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 at the same time point and during the week prior to discharge. Results: The PWB dimensions of autonomy, positive relations, and self-acceptance were associated with clinically significant change, while the dimensions of personal growth and self-acceptance were associated with reliable change. The early therapeutic alliance showed both direct and indirect effects on therapy outcome, predicting clinically significant and reliable symptom reduction. It also emerged as a significant mediator in the relationship between all PWB dimensions and overall symptomatic change. Conclusion: The identification of individual, adaptive characteristics in ED patients that might influence their development of an early therapeutic alliance may help therapists to predict relationship ruptures and tailor their interventions to enhance treatment effectiveness.

From symptoms to subjective and bodily experiences: the contribution of the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (PDM-2) to diagnosis and treatment monitoring in eating disorders.

PURPOSE: Atheoretical and descriptive conceptualizations of eating disorders (EDs) have faced substantial criticism due to their limited ability to assess patients' subjective characteristics and experiences, as needed to determine the most appropriate treatment options. The present article provides an overview of the clinical and empirical literature supporting the potential contribution of the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (PDM-2) to both diagnostic assessment and treatment monitoring. METHODS: Following a discussion of the most relevant shortcomings of current diagnostic models of EDs and a description of the rationale and structure of the PDM-2, evidence supporting the core PDM-2 dimensions of ED patients' subjective experiences (i.e., affective states, cognitive processes, relational patterns, somatic/bodily experiences and states) are examined, alongside their relevance to ED diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: Overall, the reviewed studies support the diagnostic importance of these patterns of subjective experiences in EDs, highlighting their potential role as either predisposing or maintaining factors to target in psychotherapy. A growing body of multidisciplinary evidence also shows that bodily and somatic experiences are central to the diagnosis and clinical management of ED patients. Moreover, there is evidence that a PDM-based assessment may enable closer monitoring of patient progress during treatment, with regard to both subjective experiences and symptom patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that current diagnostic frameworks for EDs would benefit from the addition of a person-centered perspective that considers not only symptoms, but also patients' full range of functioning-including their deep and surface-level emotional, cognitive, interpersonal, and social patterns-to improve patient-tailored interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, narrative review.

Evaluating empirically valid and clinically meaningful change in intensive residential treatment for severe eating disorders at discharge and at a 6-month follow-up.

PURPOSE: The present study evaluated the statistical and clinical significance of symptomatic change at discharge and after 6 months of an intensive residential treatment for patients with eating disorders (ED), and explored the individual factors that may affect therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: A sample of 118 female ED patients were assessed at intake and discharge on the following dimensions: BMI, ED-specific symptoms, depressive features, and overall symptomatic distress. A subsample of 59 patients filled out the same questionnaires at a 6-month follow-up after discharge. RESULTS: Findings evidenced statistically significant changes in all outcome measures at both discharge and follow-up. Between 30.1 and 38.6% of patients at discharge and 35.2-54.2% at the 6-month follow-up showed clinically significant symptomatic change; additionally, 19.8-29.1% of patients at discharge and 22.9-38.3% at follow-up improved reliably. However, 34.9-39.8% remained unchanged and 2-4.8% worsened. At the 6-month follow-up, 21.3-25.9% showed no symptomatic change and 0-3.7% had deteriorated. Unchanged and deteriorated patients had an earlier age of ED onset and were more likely to suffer a comorbid personality pathology and to be following concurrent pharmacological treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggested that intensive and multimodal residential treatment may be effective for the majority of ED patients, and that therapeutic outcomes tend to improve over time. Prevention strategies should focus on early onset subjects and those with concurrent personality pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, evidence obtained from a longitudinal cohort study.