ABSTRACT
Background The risk of adrenal insufficiency (AI) in using single-dose etomidate for intubation among patients with sepsis remains controversial. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of AI and characterize the risk factors in patients who received etomidate for rapid sequence intubation (RSI). Methods This is a retrospective study of prospectively-acquired data evaluating surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients who developed respiratory failure undergoing RSI. Results Of the 44 adult SICU patients who developed respiratory failure, 34 patients received etomidate. The average age for the total cohort, for the patients that received etomidate and for those who did not, was 70.91 ± 14.92, 72.82 ± 13.61 years and 64.40 ± 15.93, respectively. Twenty-four patients of the total cohort (54.55%) developed AI; 26 had septic shock (59.09%), and 16 patients had AI and septic shock (36.36%). There was no statistical significance between the incidence of AI in patients who received etomidate (47%) and those who did not (80%). However, in the subset of patients who received etomidate for RSI, there was a non-significant trend toward increased incidence of AI in those who were septic compared to those who were not (p = 0.06). Conclusion A single dose of etomidate used for RSI in SICU patients is not associated with the development of AI or mortality. However, a trend was shown, although not statistically significant, towards the development of AI in septic patients. High-quality and adequately powered randomized control trials (RCTs) are warranted.
ABSTRACT
Background Fenoldopam is a short-acting dopamine A1 receptor agonist which mediates vasodilation of the renal arteries, thereby increasing urine output. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of fenoldopam and its synergistic effect on furosemide for improving the urine output in postoperative critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Methods This is a retrospective study of postoperative critically ill patients with AKI. Patients who received furosemide (control group) were compared with those who received furosemide plus fenoldopam (treatment group) and evaluated at 12 and 24 hours post-treatment. Patients with oliguria and AKI were included in the study, while patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were excluded. Glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine, blood pressure, calculated fluid accumulation, fluid intake, urine output, and total fluid output were used as variables to assess the medication effect. Results Of the 126 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 87 patients received furosemide alone, and 39 patients received furosemide plus fenoldopam during their first 24 hours of admission to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). Although not statistically significant, the addition of fenoldopam demonstrated an increase in mean urine output of 1525ml (IQR; 1530-2095) in the first 24 hours (P=0.06). There was also noted an increase in the urine output (p= 0.07) and a decrease in the total fluid accumulation when fenoldopam was co-administered with furosemide when compared to the patients who were only treated with furosemide (p=0.06). There was no significant change in creatinine clearance from baseline in either group. Conclusion Fenoldopam may increase urine output in postoperative critically ill patients with acute kidney injury when administered within the first 24 hours of presentation. Based on our results, fenoldopam appears to have a synergistic effect with furosemide in our study population.
