Consensus Statement No. 434: Simulation in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive and current overview of the evidence for the value of simulation for education, team training, patient safety, and quality improvement in obstetrics and gynaecology, to familiarize readers with principles to consider in developing a simulation program, and to provide tools and references for simulation advocates. TARGET POPULATION: Providers working to improve health care for Canadian women and their families; patients and their families. OUTCOMES: Simulation has been validated in the literature as contributing to positive outcomes in achieving learning objectives, maintaining individual and team competence, and enhancing patient safety. Simulation is a well-developed modality with established principles to maximize its utility and create a safe environment for simulation participants. Simulation is most effective when it involves interprofessional collaboration, institutional support, and regular repetition. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: This modality improves teamwork skills, patient outcomes, and health care spending. Upholding prescribed principles of psychological safety when implementing a simulation program minimizes harm to participants. However, simulation can be an expensive tool requiring human resources, equipment, and time. EVIDENCE: Articles published between 2003 and 2022 were retrieved through searches of Medline and PubMed using the keywords "simulation" and "simulator." The search was limited to articles published in English and French. The articles were reviewed for their quality, relevance, and value by the SOGC Simulation Working Group. Expert opinion from relevant seminal books was also considered. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: All health care professionals working to improve Canadian women's health, and relevant stakeholders, including granting agencies, physician/nursing/midwifery colleges, accreditation bodies, academic centres, hospitals, and training programs.

Examining the effects of an obstetrics interprofessional programme on reductions to reportable events and their related costs.

There are many ways to account for the return on investment (ROI) in healthcare: improved communication, teamwork, culture, patient satisfaction, staff satisfaction, and clinical outcomes are but a few. Some of these are easier to quantify and associate to an intervention than others. What if the outcomes listed were not just independent results, but beget one another? In 2001, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada created the Managing Obstetrical Risk Efficiently (MOREOB) programme, to improve healthcare culture and patient outcomes in obstetrics by leveraging front-line ownership. Our study provides evidence that MOREOB lowers the frequency and cost of reportable events in maternity units. We sought to review the impact of this intervention on the frequency and cost of reportable events at the insurer level of a clinically focused, three-year interprofessional culture change intervention applied to the maternity unit. We compared the impact of reportable events both in the obstetrical and in the non-obstetrical areas of the same hospitals during the same time periods. We analysed these data using an interrupted time series (ITS) design, among 34 Ontario Canada hospitals. The ITS design assessed changes in the frequency and cost of reportable events before and after the implementation of the intervention. The method was ideally suited as the various maternity units had differing programme commencement and completion dates. The frequency of reportable events showed little change during the three-year intervention. As culture change grew, the changes in behaviour and processes that impact patient outcomes took longer to accrue. A large reduction in the frequency of reportable events occurred in the following three-year (14% reduction) and six-year (25% reduction) tranches. Our results show statistically significant reductions in the frequency and costs associated with reportable events at the level of an insurer. The results also give insight as to the investment of time required to achieve a level of sustainability.