ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of serological indicators and evaluate the diagnostic value of a new established combined serological model on identifying the minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) in patients with compensated cirrhosis.Methods:This prospective multicenter study enrolled 263 compensated cirrhotic patients from 23 hospitals in 15 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities of China between October 2021 and August 2022. Clinical data and laboratory test results were collected, and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was calculated. Ammonia level was corrected to the upper limit of normal (AMM-ULN) by the baseline blood ammonia measurements/upper limit of the normal reference value. MHE was diagnosed by combined abnormal number connection test-A and abnormal digit symbol test as suggested by Guidelines on the management of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis. The patients were randomly divided (7∶3) into training set ( n=185) and validation set ( n=78) based on caret package of R language. Logistic regression was used to establish a combined model of MHE diagnosis. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curve. The internal verification was carried out by the Bootstrap method ( n=200). AUC comparisons were achieved using the Delong test. Results:In the training set, prevalence of MHE was 37.8% (70/185). There were statistically significant differences in AMM-ULN, albumin, platelet, alkaline phosphatase, international normalized ratio, MELD score and education between non-MHE group and MHE group (all P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that AMM-ULN [odds ratio ( OR)=1.78, 95% confidence interval ( CI) 1.05-3.14, P=0.038] and MELD score ( OR=1.11, 95% CI 1.04-1.20, P=0.002) were independent risk factors for MHE, and the AUC for predicting MHE were 0.663, 0.625, respectively. Compared with the use of blood AMM-ULN and MELD score alone, the AUC of the combined model of AMM-ULN, MELD score and education exhibited better predictive performance in determining the presence of MHE was 0.755, the specificity and sensitivity was 85.2% and 55.7%, respectively. Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curve showed that the model had good calibration ( P=0.733). The AUC for internal validation of the combined model for diagnosing MHE was 0.752. In the validation set, the AUC of the combined model for diagnosing MHE was 0.794, and Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed good calibration ( P=0.841). Conclusion:Use of the combined model including AMM-ULN, MELD score and education could improve the predictive efficiency of MHE among patients with compensated cirrhosis.
ABSTRACT
AimThe present study discussed the humoral immune response and antibody dynamics after primary and booster immunity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines among patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) in the real world. Thus, it provided data to develop SARS-CoV-2 vaccination strategy. MethodsPatients with confirmed CLD and completed primary or booster immunity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were enrolled. Serological specimens were collected after primary or booster immunity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines to detect novel coronavirus neutralizing antibody (nCoV NTAb) and novel coronavirus spike receptor-binding domain antibody (nCoV S-RBD). Thus, we could evaluate the humoral immune response and antibody dynamics after primary and booster immunity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines among patients with CLD. Simultaneously, baseline demographics, liver disease-related situations, comorbidity-related situations, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination information, and laboratory examination-related indicators of patients were collected. ResultsA total of 315 patients received SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, including 223 patients who completed the primary immunity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, 114 patients who completed booster immunity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and 22 patients who underwent the antibody detection of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines after both primary and booster immunities. The positive rate of nCoV NTAb was 59.64% in Primary and 87.72% in Booster (P<0.001). The median level of nCoV NTAb was 11.53 AU/mL in Primary and 31.98 AU/mL in Booster (P<0.001). The positive rate of nCoV S-RBD was 69.06% in Primary and 91.23% in Booster (P<0.001). The median level of nCoV S-RBD was 21.60AU/mL in Primary and 112.65 AU/mL in Booster (P<0.001). After booster immunity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in 22 patients, the positive rate of nCoV NTAb increased from 59.09% to 86.36%, and that of nCoV S-RBD increased from 68.18% to 90.91%. The median level of nCoV NTAb increased from 11.24 AU /mL to 59.14 AU /mL after booster immunity. The median level of nCoV S-RBD increased from 27.28 AU/mL to 219.10 AU/mL. Compared to the antibody level of primary immunity, the median level of nCoV NTAb and nCoV S-RBD in 22 patients was increased by 5.26 and 8.03 times, respectively. Among 22 patients, 9 were negative for nCoV NTAb after primary immunity, while 6 were transformed positive after booster immunity, and the positive conversion rate of nCoV NTAb was 66.7%. On the other hand, 7 patients were negative for nCoV S-RBD after primary immunity, while 5 were transformed positive after booster immunity, and the positive conversion rate of nCoV S-RBD was 71.4%. ConclusionPatients with CLD show improved humoral immune response after completing primary and booster immunity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, while booster immunity further improves the positive rate and antibody level of patients with CLD. Finally, the positive conversion rate among patients with primary immunity failure also can be improved after booster immunity.
