Individuals with psychosis present a reduced lung diffusion capacity and early spirometry alterations: Results from a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Individuals with psychosis present a greater prevalence of chronic lung diseases, including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). These chronic respiratory diseases are preceded by early lung function alterations; such as preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) or normal spirometry but low diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO). However, there is no previous evidence on these lung function alterations in psychosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk of having spirometry and DLCO alterations in subjects with psychosis compared with a control group. METHODS: Cross-sectional study on a cohort of 170 individuals including 96 subjects with psychosis and 74 sex-age-and smoking habit matched healthy controls. All subjects were under 60 years-old, and without COPD or asthma. Respiratory function was evaluated through spirometry. Clinical characteristics and DLCO values were recorded. RESULTS: Patients with psychosis showed lower spirometry results, both in terms of absolute and percentage of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1). Absolute and percentage levels of diffusion were also lower in patients with psychosis. The percentage of individuals with DLCO<80% was higher among patients with psychosis (75% vs. 40%, p < 0.001). And the prevalence of PRISm was higher among patients with psychosis (10.4% vs. 1.4%, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that psychosis was an independent predictor of DLCO<80% (OR 5.67, CI95% 1.86-17.27). CONCLUSION: Patients with psychosis and females had early alterations in lung function. These results suggest that early screening for lung disease should be encouraged in psychosis.

Increased risk of early lung function alterations in people with psychosis: A cross-sectional case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking has been described as the main cause of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and this habit is clearly more frequent among individuals with psychosis than in the general population, with rates reaching up to 60%. However, little attention has been focused on the association of COPD and psychosis. We aimed to explore the risk of presenting early lung function alterations in a group of individuals with psychosis. METHODS: Following an observational cross-sectional design we studied a cohort of individuals with established psychosis (N=128), and compared them with a sex, age, and smoking habit matched control group (N=79). We evaluated respiratory symptoms by means of mMRC, CAT and Dyspnea-12 scales. And lung function through spirometry tests. RESULTS: Individuals with psychosis presented more respiratory symptoms than controls. Similarly, we observed significant differences in the lung function tests between these two groups, where individuals with psychosis presented worse results in most of the spirometry mean values (FEV1 or forced expiratory volume in the first one second: 3.29L vs. 3.75L, p<0.001; forced vital capacity or FVC: 4.25L vs. 4.72L, p=0.002; and FEV1/FVC ratio: 0.78 vs. 0.80, p=0.052). Patients also presented worse values of lung diffusion, with lower diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) than controls (6.95 vs. 8.54mmol/min/kPa, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The individuals with psychosis in our study presented greater respiratory symptoms and poorer lung function measured through spirometry. These signs have been described as early signs of COPD.

Long-term mental health impact of COVID-19 on primary care health workers in northern Spain: Results from a two-phase longitudinal study.

Background: COVID-19 pandemic has affected the mental health of the general population, and in particular of health professionals. Primary care personnel are at greater risk due to being highly exposed to the disease and working regularly in direct contact with patients suffering COVID-19. However, there is not sufficient evidence on the long-term psychological impact these professionals may suffer. We aimed to explore the long-term psychological impact of COVID-19 on primary care professionals. Methods: We applied a two-phase design; a self-reported psychopathology screening (PHQ-9, GAD-7, ISI and IES-R) in phase-1, and a specialised psychiatric evaluation (MINI, HDRS and STAI) in phase-2 to confirm phase-1 results. Evaluations were carried at the beginning of the pandemic (May-June 2020) (n = 410) and one year later (n = 339). Chi-square, ANOVA and logistic regression tests were used for statistical analyses. Results: Primary care professionals presented high rates of depression, anxiety and psychological distress, measured by PHQ-9, GAD-7 and IES-R respectively, during the pandemic. Depressive symptoms' severity (PHQ-9: 7.5 vs 8.4, p = 0.013) increased after one year of COVID-19 pandemic. After one year nearly 40% of subjects presented depression. Being women, having suffered COVID-19 or a relative with COVID-19, and being a front-line professional were risk factors for presenting depression and anxiety. Conclusion: Primary Care professionals in Cantabria present a poor mental health during COVID-19 pandemic, which has even worsened at long-term, presenting a greater psychopathology severity one year after. Thus, it is critical implementing prevention and early-treatment programmes to help these essential professionals to cope with the pandemic.

Antecedentes: La pandemia de COVID-19 ha afectado la salud mental de la población general, y en particular de los sanitarios. El personal de atención primaria tiene mayor riesgo por estar más expuesto a la enfermedad y trabajar regularmente en contacto directo con pacientes que padecen COVID-19. Sin embargo, no existe suficiente evidencia sobre el impacto psicológico a largo plazo que pueden sufrir estos profesionales. Nuestro objetivo fue explorar el impacto psicológico a largo plazo de COVID-19 en los profesionales de atención primaria. Métodos: Se aplicó un diseño en dos fases; un cribado de psicopatología a través de cuestionarios autoaplicados (PHQ-9, GAD-7, ISI e IES-R) en la fase 1, y una evaluación psiquiátrica especializada (MINI, HDRS y STAI) en la fase 2 para confirmar los resultados de la fase 1. Las evaluaciones se realizaron al inicio de la pandemia (mayo-junio de 2020) (n = 410) y un año después (n = 339). Se utilizaron pruebas de X 2, ANOVA y regresión logística para los análisis estadísticos. Resultados: Los profesionales de atención primaria presentaron índices elevados de depresión, ansiedad y malestar psicológico, medidos por PHQ-9, GAD-7 e IES-R, respectivamente, durante la pandemia. La severidad de los síntomas depresivos (PHQ-9: 7,5 vs 8,4; p = 0,013) aumentó tras un año de pandemia COVID-19. Después de un año, casi 40% de los sujetos presentaron depresión. El sexo femenino, haber padecido COVID-19 o tener un familiar con COVID-19 y ser profesional de primera línea fueron factores de riesgo para presentar depresión y ansiedad. Conclusiones: Los profesionales de Atención Primaria en Cantabria presentaron una mala salud mental durante la pandemia de COVID-19, la cual además empeoró a largo plazo, presentando una mayor gravedad los síntomas un año después. Por lo tanto, es fundamental implementar programas de prevención y tratamiento temprano para ayudar a estos profesionales esenciales a hacer frente a la pandemia.

Implantación de una actividad de formación médica continuada y evaluación de su calidad en los Servicios de Urgencias de Atención Primaria (SUAP) de Cantabria / Introduction of a continuous medical training activity and evaluation of its quality in the Primary Care Emergency Services of Cantabria, Spain

OBJETIVO: Evaluación de la puesta en marcha de una actividad formativa para profesionales de los servicios de urgencia de atención primaria (SUAP) que les dote de las herramientas necesarias para la resolución in situ de los procesos urgentes, con los medios y recursos disponibles en cada centro. MÉTODO: Cuestionario anónimo de valoración de la actividad realizada durante cada una de las sesiones del año 2015. Dicho cuestionario fue cumplimentado al final de cada sesión, permitiendo valorar a los docentes de manera individualizada. RESULTADOS: La plantilla de los SUAP de Cantabria es de 123 médicos y 123 profesionales de enfermería. De ellos han asistido a las sesiones un total de 178 profesionales (72% de la plantilla). De los asistentes han cumplimentado la encuesta de valoración de la actividad una media de 143 profesionales (80% del total de asistentes), 81% mujeres y 19% varones. El 58% de los asistentes eran médicos de familia y el 42% personal de enfermería. En cuanto a los resultados del programa resaltaban el interés del curso para su actividad profesional (96%), si recomendaría el curso a sus compañeros (94%) y la satisfacción de haber realizado el curso (94%). CONCLUSIONES: La puesta en marcha de actividades formativas en los SUAP ha sido percibida como muy favorable por los profesionales encuestados

OBJECTIVE: An evaluation was performed on the introduction of a training activity for professionals of the Primary Care Emergency Services (SUAP) in order to equip them with the necessary tools for the on-site resolution of urgent processes, and with the resources available in each centre. METHOD: An anonymous questionnaire was used to assess the activity performed during each of the sessions of the year 2015. This questionnaire was completed at the end of each session, allowing the assessment of individual teachers. RESULTS: The staff of the SUAP in Cantabria included 123 physicians and 123 nursing professionals. A total of 178 professionals attended the sessions (72% of the workforce). A total of 143 professionals (80% of the total attendees), 81% female and 19% male, were included in the survey. Just over half (58%) of the attendees were family physicians and 42% were nurses. The major results of the program were as follows: the interest of the course for their professional activity (96%), they would recommend the course to their colleagues (94%), and the satisfaction of having completed the course (94%). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of training activities in the SUAP has been perceived as very favourable by the professionals surveyed

Independent effect of prior exacerbation frequency and disease severity on the risk of future exacerbations of COPD: a retrospective cohort study.

Few studies have researched the independent effect of COPD severity on the risk of future exacerbations adjusted by previous exacerbation frequency. We aimed to analyse the independent effect of COPD severity on the risk of exacerbations in the following year, and whether this effect was stronger or not than the effect of a previous history of exacerbations. We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study including 900 patients with confirmed COPD. Exacerbation frequency was observed for the previous year and for the following year. Patients were defined as 'Frequent Exacerbator' (FE) phenotype if they suffered ⩾2 exacerbations in a year, and were categorised according to the severity of COPD (GOLD Grades 1-4). Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated by logistic regression adjusting for age, gender, smoking status, severity of COPD and being FE in the previous year. The main predictor of being FE among all grades of COPD severity was a history of frequent exacerbations in the previous year: adjusted OR 4.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) (3.54-6.97). COPD severity was associated with a higher risk of being FE: Crude OR GOLD Grade 4 3.86; 95% CI (1.50-9.93). However, this association diminished after adjusting for being FE in the previous year: adjusted OR 2.08; 95% CI (0.75-5.82). Our results support that a history of frequent exacerbations in the previous year is the most important independent predictor of exacerbations in the following year, also among the most severe COPD patients. Severity of COPD would be associated with a higher risk of exacerbations, but this effect would be partly determined by the exacerbations suffered in the previous year.

Predictors of Hospitalized Exacerbations and Mortality in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) carry significant consequences for patients and are responsible for considerable health-care costs-particularly if hospitalization is required. Despite the importance of hospitalized exacerbations, relatively little is known about their determinants. This study aimed to analyze predictors of hospitalized exacerbations and mortality in COPD patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study. We selected 900 patients with confirmed COPD aged ≥35 years by simple random sampling among all COPD patients in Cantabria (northern Spain) on December 31, 2011. We defined moderate exacerbations as events that led a care provider to prescribe antibiotics or corticosteroids and severe exacerbations as exacerbations requiring hospital admission. We observed exacerbation frequency over the previous year (2011) and following year (2012). We categorized patients according to COPD severity based on forced expiratory volume in 1 second (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] grades 1-4). We estimated the odds ratios (ORs) by logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, COPD severity, and frequent exacerbator phenotype the previous year. RESULTS: Of the patients, 16.4% had ≥1 severe exacerbations, varying from 9.3% in mild GOLD grade 1 to 44% in very severe COPD patients. A history of at least two prior severe exacerbations was positively associated with new severe exacerbations (adjusted OR, 6.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.53-12.83) and mortality (adjusted OR, 7.63; 95%CI, 3.41-17.05). Older age and several comorbidities, such as heart failure and diabetes, were similarly associated. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized exacerbations occurred with all grades of airflow limitation. A history of severe exacerbations was associated with new hospitalized exacerbations and mortality.