Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clín. investig. ginecol. obstet. (Ed. impr.) ; 36(4): 156-158, jul.-ago. 2009. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-61632

ABSTRACT

Gestante de 34 semanas presenta poliuria y polidipsia asociada en los días posteriores a preclampsia grave, lo cual obliga a practicar cesárea urgente a las 35 semanas por registro cardiotocográfico patológico y grave deterioro de los parámetros bioquímicos. Se extrae recién nacido vivo de 2.300g de peso. El postoperatorio cursa favorablemente con restitución íntegra clínica y analítica (AU)


A 34-week pregnant woman showed polyuria and polydipsia in the next few days after a severe pre-eclamsia with pathological cardiotocographic recordings and severe deterioration of biochemical parameters, requiring emergency caesarean section at 35 week. A 2,300 g living newborn was delivered. The postoperative course developed favourably, the symptoms had resoved and all laboratory data became normal (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Pre-Eclampsia/diagnosis , Diabetes Insipidus/diagnosis , HELLP Syndrome/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Outcome
2.
Clín. investig. ginecol. obstet. (Ed. impr.) ; 35(4): 141-143, jul. 2008. ilus
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-66767

ABSTRACT

Presentamos un caso de embarazo del segundo trimestre (16 semanas) complicado con cuadro de abdomen agudo por leiomioma gigante pediculado con torsión del pedículo y necrosis tumoral. Se practicó miomectomía de urgencias evolucionando favorablemente el postoperatorio. La gestación continúa con normalidad a las 28 semanas (AU)


We describe a second-trimester pregnancy (16 weeks) complicated by acute abdomen due to giant pedunculated leiomyoma with torsion of the pedicle and necrosis. Emergency myomectomy was performed with favorable postoperative course. The pregnancy continues with no abnormalities at 28 weeks (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Pregnancy , Leiomyoma/complications , Leiomyoma/drug therapy , Leiomyoma/surgery , Laparotomy , Abdomen, Acute/diagnosis , Abdomen, Acute/surgery , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/surgery , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Abdominal Pain/pathology , Pelvis , Abdomen
3.
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-052478

ABSTRACT

Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo y comparativo acerca de los efectos de la analgesia epidural frente a no analgesia epidural en el parto, en una muestra de 1.928 partos acontecidos en un período de 3 años y se atendió a una serie de parámetros que se pueden ver influenciados de manera positiva o negativa, como son factores relacionados con las distintas fases del parto, distocias, instrumentación, índice de cesáreas, repercusiones neonatales e impacto sobre el suelo pélvico. Tras el tratamiento estadístico, se observaron diferencias significativas en la prolongación del parto, el mayor número de instrumentación, el aumento en la tasa de cesáreas y el incremento del índice de episiotomías en multíparas en los partos conducidos bajo analgesia epidural. Por el contrario, no se dieron diferencias significativas en las distocias en occipito posterior, fiebre intraparto, partos con cesárea anterior o episiotomías en primíparas. Hubo significación estadística a favor de los partos sin analgesia epidural en el número de infecciones neonatales, así como desgarros perineales de primer grado en multíparas e integridad perineal en multíparas. A tenor de estos resultados obtenidos en nuestro hospital, nos planteamos incorporar al documento de consentimiento informado sobre analgesia epidural todos los posibles efectos adversos derivados de ésta (AU)


We performed a descriptive retrospective study comparing the effects of the application versus non application of epidural analgesia during delivery in1928 women over a 3-year period. Several parameters that could be positively or negatively influenced by epidural analgesia administration, such as factors related to the different stages of delivery, dystocia, instrumentation, rate of cesarean sections, neonatal repercussion and impact on the pelvic floor, were evaluated. Statistical analysis revealed that epidural analgesia was associated with prolongation of delivery and increases in the number of instruments involved and the rates of cesarean section and episiotomy in multiparas. These differences were statistically significant. In contrast, no significant differences were found in the occurrence of dystocia in the occipito posterior position, intrapartum fever, deliveries with prior cesarian section or episiotomy in primiparas. Statistically significant differences were found in favor of deliveries without epidural analgesia in the number of neonatal infections, as well as in first degree lacerations and perineal integrity in multiparous women In view of the results obtained in our hospital, we are considering adding all the possible adverse effects associated with epidural analgesia to our informed consent document (AU)


Subject(s)
Female , Adult , Humans , Analgesia, Epidural/instrumentation , Analgesia, Epidural/methods , Mepivacaine/therapeutic use , Bupivacaine/therapeutic use , Labor, Obstetric , Labor Onset , Parity , Episiotomy/methods , Episiotomy , Analgesia, Epidural/standards , Analgesia, Epidural/trends , Analgesia, Epidural , Retrospective Studies , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Bias , Parity/physiology , Apgar Score
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...