ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The assessment of lymphoma response to treatment is based on imaging studies. OBJECTIVE: To correlate the assessment of lymphoma treatment response by computed tomography (CT) and by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). METHOD: Cross-sectional, observational study, where records of patients with lymphoma under surveillance by CT and PET/CT were reviewed. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 43 patients with a mean age of 32.7 ± 22.4 years; 26 (60.5 %) had a diagnosis of Hodgkin's lymphoma and 17 (9.5 %) had non-Hodgkin lymphoma. By CT, 34 (79.1 %) were diagnosed with disease and nine (20.9 %) without disease. The criteria used to assess the response was radiologist experience in 39 (90.7 %) and RECIST 1.1 criteria in four (9.3 %). The diagnosis by 18-FDG PET/CT was no response to treatment or partial response-recurrence in 32 (74.4 %) and response to treatment in 11 (25.6 %); with PERCIST criteria in 13 (30.2 %) and Deuaville criteria in 30 (69.8 %). When the diagnosis by CT versus 18-FDG PET/CT was compared, out of 11 patients with complete response on PET/CT, three had a similar CT diagnosis. Of the 34 patients with data consistent disease diagnosed by CT, 26 had similar results by 18-FDG PET/CT (p = 0.54). CONCLUSION: The value of lymphoma treatment response on CT does not agree with that obtained by 18-FDG PET/CT.
INTRODUCCIÓN: La evaluación de la respuesta al tratamiento de linfoma se basa en estudios de imagen. OBJETIVO: Correlacionar la evaluación de la respuesta al tratamiento de linfoma mediante tomografía axial computarizada (TAC) y tomografía por emisión de positrones/tomografía computarizada (PET/TC). MÉTODO: Estudio observacional transversal en el que se revisaron expedientes de pacientes con linfoma en vigilancia mediante TAC y PET/TC. RESULTADOS: La población de estudio estuvo constituida por 43 pacientes con edad media de 32.7 ± 22.4 años; 26 (60.5 %) tenían diagnóstico de linfoma de Hodgkin y 17 (9.5 %), de linfoma no Hodgkin. Por TAC se diagnosticaron 34 (79.1 %) con enfermedad y nueve (20.9 %) sin enfermedad. El criterio para evaluar la respuesta fue la experiencia del médico imagenólogo en 39 (90.7 %) y RECIST 1.1 en cuatro (9.3 %). Por PET/TC con 18-FDG se diagnosticó falta de respuesta al tratamiento o respuesta parcial-recurrencia en 32 pacientes (74.4 %) y con respuesta al tratamiento en 11 (25.6 %); con los criterios PERCIST en 13 (30.2 %) y con los de Deuaville en 30 (69.8 %). Al comparar el diagnóstico por TAC contra PET/TC, de 11 pacientes con respuesta total, tres tuvieron diagnóstico tomográfico similar. De los 34 pacientes con datos de enfermedad diagnosticados por tomografía, 26 tuvieron resultados similares por PET/TC con 18-FDG (p = 0.54). CONCLUSIÓN: El valor de la respuesta al tratamiento por TAC en linfoma no concuerda con el obtenido mediante PET/TC con 18-FDG.
Subject(s)
Hodgkin Disease/diagnostic imaging , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/diagnostic imaging , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Humans , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: La evaluación de la respuesta al tratamiento de linfoma se basa en estudios de imagen. Objetivo: Correlacionar la evaluación de la respuesta al tratamiento de linfoma mediante tomografía axial computarizada (TAC) y tomografía por emisión de positrones/tomografía computarizada (PET/TC). Método: Estudio observacional transversal en el que se revisaron expedientes de pacientes con linfoma en vigilancia mediante TAC y PET/TC. Resultados: La población de estudio estuvo constituida por 43 pacientes con edad media de 32.7 ± 22.4 años; 26 (60.5 %) tenían diagnóstico de linfoma de Hodgkin y 17 (9.5 %), de linfoma no Hodgkin. Por TAC se diagnosticaron 34 (79.1 %) con enfermedad y nueve (20.9 %) sin enfermedad. El criterio para evaluar la respuesta fue la experiencia del médico imagenólogo en 39 (90.7 %) y RECIST 1.1 en cuatro (9.3 %). Por PET/TC con 18-FDG se diagnosticó falta de respuesta al tratamiento o respuesta parcial-recurrencia en 32 pacientes (74.4 %) y con respuesta al tratamiento en 11 (25.6 %); con los criterios PERCIST en 13 (30.2 %) y con los de Deuaville en 30 (69.8 %). Al comparar el diagnóstico por TAC contra PET/TC, de 11 pacientes con respuesta total, tres tuvieron diagnóstico tomográfico similar. De los 34 pacientes con datos de enfermedad diagnosticados por tomografía, 26 tuvieron resultados similares por PET/TC con 18-FDG (p = 0.54). Conclusión: El valor de la respuesta al tratamiento por TAC en linfoma no concuerda con el obtenido mediante PET/TC con 18-FDG.
Abstract Introduction: The assessment of lymphoma response to treatment is based on imaging studies. Objective: To correlate the assessment of lymphoma treatment response by computed tomography (CT) and by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Method: Cross-sectional, observational study, where records of patients with lymphoma under surveillance by CT and PET/CT were reviewed. Results: The study population consisted of 43 patients with a mean age of 32.7 ± 22.4 years; 26 (60.5 %) had a diagnosis of Hodgkins lymphoma and 17 (9.5 %) had non-Hodgkin lymphoma. By CT, 34 (79.1 %) were diagnosed with disease and nine (20.9 %) without disease. The criteria used to assess the response was radiologist experience in 39 (90.7 %) and RECIST 1.1 criteria in four (9.3 %). The diagnosis by 18-FDG PET/CT was no response to treatment or partial response-recurrence in 32 (74.4 %) and response to treatment in 11 (25.6 %); with PERCIST criteria in 13 (30.2 %) and Deuaville criteria in 30 (69.8 %). When the diagnosis by CT versus 18-FDG PET/CT was compared, out of 11 patients with complete response on PET/CT, three had a similar CT diagnosis. Of the 34 patients with data consistent disease diagnosed by CT, 26 had similar results by 18-FDG PET/CT (p = 0.54). Conclusion: The value of lymphoma treatment response on CT does not agree with that obtained by 18-FDG PET/CT.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Young Adult , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/diagnostic imaging , Hodgkin Disease/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/therapy , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Treatment Outcome , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18ABSTRACT
Background: Parry-Romberg syndrome is characterized by the presence of progressive hemifacial atrophy that affects the growth and development of structures on one side of the face. Our objective was to introduce collagen-polyvinylpirrolidone as a new therapeutic option for Parry-Romberg syndrome in two clinical cases. Clinical cases: two women, aging 56 and 28 years old, with facial hypocrhomic lesions, and right and left fronto-malar sunken area respectively, treated with topic steroids + penicilamina, fat grafts and silicone implants without improvement. We used collagen-polyvinylpirrolidone and they showed improvement: after six months there were not clinical or esthetical complications. Conclusions: collagen-polivinilpirrolidone could be a new therapeutic option for Parry-Romberg syndrome with good clinical and esthetical results. It is easy to apply and it has few side effects and without complications.
Introducción: el síndrome de Parry-Romberg está caracterizado por la presencia de atrofia hemifacial progresiva, afección del crecimiento y desarrollo de las estructuras de un lado de la cara. El objetivo de este trabajo es describir nuestra experiencia con el colágeno polivinilpirrolidona para tratar el síndrome de Parry-Romberg. Casos clínicos: dos mujeres de 56 y 28 años de edad, con manchas hiperpigmentadas y hundimiento frontomalar derecho e izquierdo, respectivamente, manejadas con esteroides tópicos más penicilamina, injertos grasos e implantes de silicón, sin mejoría. Se decidió iniciar tratamiento con colágeno-polivinilpirrolidona, con lo que se logró una mejoría clínica y estética sin complicaciones después de seis meses de seguimiento. Conclusiones: el colágeno polivinilpirrolidona es una opción terapéutica para el síndrome de Parry-Romberg que ofrece buenos resultados clínicos y estéticos, es de fácil administración, sin complicaciones y mínimos efectos secundarios.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of women who undergo mastectomy without reconstructive treatment due to breast cancer present sequelae. These include paresthesias, keloid healing, hypoesthesia, lymphedema and limitation of the function of the ipsilateral upper extremity. We undertook this study to present the results using collagen-polyvinylpyrrolidone (Clg- Pvp) as treatment for posmastectomy sequelae in women with breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted a unicentric, longitudinal and prospective clinical trial between August 1, 2007 and July 31, 2008. Included variables were age, lymphedema, limitation of the function of the ipsilateral upper extremity, collapse of the wound, keloid healing, paresthesias, and appearance of the surgical area. The appearance of the surgical area (aesthetic aspect) was evaluated before and 6 months after treatment was initiated. Clg-Pvp was administered weekly for a 6-month period. RESULTS: Seven women were included with a median age of 49 years (range: 40-72 years). One patient (14.28%) presented lymphedema, two patients (28.57%) presented collapse of the wound, two patients (28.57%) had keloid healing, three patients (42.85%) experienced paresthesias, five patients (71.4%) reported pain, and five patients (71.4%) reported limitation of the function of the ipsilateral upper extremity. At the completion of the treatment, aesthetic improvement was statistically significant (p = 0.0020, Mann-Whitney U test). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and aesthetic results are good after application of Clg-Pvp for treating sequelae in women with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy without reconstructive surgery.
