Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
3.
J Surg Res ; 236: 230-237, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30694761

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery, which remains a serious clinical problem that causes augmented morbidity and mortality, is usually favored by ischemia. The aim of this study was to determine whether alprostadil may improve anastomotic wound healing under ischemic condition. METHODS: Ninety-three adult Wistar rats were randomized into three groups: control, ischemia (by devascularization along the first 2 cm at each anastomotic end), and ischemia plus alprostadil. Resection of a colonic segment at the colorectal junction and an anastomosis was performed. Animals were euthanized at 8 d. Surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, and grade of intra-abdominal adhesions using a validated scale were determined. Bursting pressure and tension were calculated and histologic examination of the anastomosis was performed. RESULTS: The ischemic group revealed an increased anastomotic leak rate (14/31 versus 3/31) and a lower bursting pressure and tension when compared to control group, validating therefore the experimental model. After intraperitoneal injection of alprostadil, anastomotic leak rate was significantly lower (5/31) and the bursting pressure and tension were significantly increased. Histologic examination revealed a lower presence of inflammatory cells, and a significantly higher neovascularization and a higher presence of fibroblasts in treated animals when compared with the ischemic group. CONCLUSIONS: Alprostadil may have a positive effect on colonic anastomotic wound healing under relative ischemic condition. Alprostadil administration increases anastomotic bursting pressure, decreases leak rate, and reverses most of the histological changes caused by blood flow decrease. These protective effects could be caused by vasodilation, stimulation of neovascularization, and immunomodulatory properties.


Subject(s)
Alprostadil/administration & dosage , Colon/surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Ischemia/surgery , Rectum/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Animals , Colon/blood supply , Colon/pathology , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Injections, Intraperitoneal , Ischemia/etiology , Male , Random Allocation , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Rectum/blood supply , Rectum/pathology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Tissue Adhesions/epidemiology , Tissue Adhesions/etiology , Tissue Adhesions/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing/drug effects
8.
Cir Esp ; 82(3): 150-4, 2007 Sep.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17916285

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Bogota bag technique is a reliable method for open abdominal closure. The aim of this study was to describe our experience with this technique. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We retrospectively evaluated our experience with the Bogota Bag technique between January 2000 and March 2006. Descriptive statistical techniques were applied and percentages and means were calculated. RESULTS: The Bogota bag technique was applied in 12 patients. The technique was the preferred closure system to prevent abdominal compartment syndrome in 11 patients (91.66%) and was required to treat abdominal compartment syndrome in one patient (8.34%). No complications occurred in relation to placement or withdrawal of the Bogota bag. There were no intestinal fistulas or intra-abdominal abscesses. The mean length of hospital stay was 46.33 days and the mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 16.58 days. The survival rate was 41.66%. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the Bogota bag is a useful technique and is the preferred closure system to prevent or treat abdominal compartment syndrome. The high mortality rates described are due to the underlying diseases leading to open abdominal closure and not directly to the Bogota bag technique itself.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/blood supply , Abdomen/surgery , Compartment Syndromes/prevention & control , Compartment Syndromes/surgery , Suture Techniques , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
9.
Cir. Esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 82(3): 150-154, sept. 2007. ilus, tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-056776

ABSTRACT

Introducción. La bolsa de Bogotá es uno de los dispositivos que se han descrito para el cierre temporal del abdomen. El objetivo de este trabajo ha sido describir nuestra experiencia con la técnica de la bolsa de Bogotá. Material y método. Analizamos retrospectivamente nuestra experiencia entre enero de 2000 y marzo de 2006. Se aplicó estadística descriptiva con cálculo de porcentajes y medias. Resultados. En un total de 12 pacientes se empleó la bolsa de Bogotá. En 11 (91,66%) se colocó de forma preventiva por presentar riesgos de hipertensión intraabdominal y síndrome compartimental abdominal. En un paciente (8,34%) la descompresión con bolsa de Bogotá se realizó una vez el síndrome compartimental se había instaurado. No hemos tenido ninguna complicación en relación con la colocación ni la retirada de la bolsa de Bogotá. En ningún caso aparecieron fístulas intestinales ni colecciones infectadas intraabdominales. La estancia media hospitalaria fue de 46,33 días y en la unidad de cuidados intensivos, de 16,58 días. En la actualidad 7/12 (58,34%) han fallecido y 5/12 (41,66%) viven. Conclusiones. La bolsa de Bogotá para el open abdomen en nuestra serie ha sido un método útil para evitar o tratar el síndrome compartimental abdominal. La gran mortalidad descrita viene dada por el proceso inicial que presentan los pacientes y no por las complicaciones derivadas de la colocación de la bolsa de Bogotá (AU)


Introduction. The Bogota bag technique is a reliable method for open abdominal closure. The aim of this study was to describe our experience with this technique. Material and method. We retrospectively evaluated our experience with the Bogota Bag technique between January 2000 and March 2006. Descriptive statistical techniques were applied and percentages and means were calculated. Results. The Bogota bag technique was applied in 12 patients. The technique was the preferred closure system to prevent abdominal compartment syndrome in 11 patients (91.66%) and was required to treat abdominal compartment syndrome in one patient (8.34%). No complications occurred in relation to placement or withdrawal of the Bogota bag. There were no intestinal fistulas or intra-abdominal abscesses. The mean length of hospital stay was 46.33 days and the mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 16.58 days. The survival rate was 41.66%. Conclusions. In our experience, the Bogota bag is a useful technique and is the preferred closure system to prevent or treat abdominal compartment syndrome. The high mortality rates described are due to the underlying diseases leading to open abdominal closure and not directly to the Bogota bag technique itself (AU)


Subject(s)
Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Humans , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Compartment Syndromes/prevention & control , Abdominal Wall/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Survival Analysis , Retrospective Studies
10.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 50(3): 369-75, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17242984

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pentoxifylline on the healing of experimental ischemic colorectal anastomoses. METHODS: Ninety-three Wistar rats were randomized into three groups (n = 31) and underwent resection of a colonic segment at the colorectal junction. Group A rats received standard end-to-end anastomoses. Ischemic anastomoses were performed in Groups B and C rats by coagulating mesocolon vessels 2 cm along each anastomotic end. Group C rats were treated with intraperitoneal injection of pentoxifylline. Wound complications, intra-abdominal abscesses, intraperitoneal adhesions, and anastomotic leaks and stenosis were recorded. Bursting pressure and tension were calculated. Histologic examination of the anastomosis was also performed. RESULTS: Ischemia increased wound and intra-abdominal infections, adhesion formation, and anastomotic stenosis. Anastomotic leakage was significantly higher in Group B (45.2 percent) than in Group A (9.7 percent). Bursting pressure and tension were significantly lower in Group B (118.19 mmHg and 48.43 N/m) than in Group A (191.84 mmHg and 86.82 N/m). There was evidence for decreased perianastomotic fibrosis and neutrophils presence after induced ischemia and a strong tendency to reduced neovascularization. Pentoxifylline administration ameliorated the effects of ischemia, reducing wound and intra-abdominal infections, adhesion formation, and leaks (16.1 percent). Anastomotic strength increased (bursting pressure and tension of 205.55 mmHg and 87.68 N/m, respectively). Treated Group C had significantly higher neutrophils infiltration and fibrosis formation and a strong tendency to increased neovascularization compared with Group B. CONCLUSIONS: Selective anastomotic devascularization induces ischemia and impairs experimental anastomotic healing, increasing leakage rate. These effects may be ameliorated by pentoxifylline administration.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Colon/drug effects , Colon/surgery , Hematologic Agents/pharmacology , Pentoxifylline/pharmacology , Wound Healing/drug effects , Animals , Chi-Square Distribution , Colon/blood supply , Ischemia , Random Allocation , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Statistics, Nonparametric
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...