Psychological pain and opioid receptors: Reward downshift is disrupted when tested in a context signaling morphine.

A sucrose downshift causes a temporary suppression of consumption accompanied by psychological pain, a negative emotion triggered by reward loss. When administered systemically before downshift sessions, opioid agonists reduce and opioid antagonists enhance such behavioral suppression. However, little is known about the effects of signals of opioid drugs on behavior during a reward downshift episode. Research showed that morphine administration can induce a direct effect (e.g., hypoalgesia) followed by a compensatory effect (e.g., hyperalgesia). Therefore, a signal for morphine could elicit either a direct or a compensatory effect. Male Wistar rats were exposed to ten 5-min sessions of access to 32% sucrose in context A, followed by three sessions of access to 4% sucrose in context B. In parallel, animals received pairings between context B and morphine (5 mg/kg, sc) occurring each day immediately after sucrose sessions (contexts were counterbalanced). Control conditions included a saline control (no morphine injected), an unpaired control (morphine injected after exposure to B) tested in A (Experiment 1), and an unpaired control tested in B (Experiment 2). In both experiments, behavioral suppression induced by the 32-to-4% sucrose downshift was attenuated when the downshift occurred in a context previously paired with morphine. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that reward downshift is accompanied by an emotion of negative valence that can be counteracted by the conditioned release of endogenous opioids triggered by signals of morphine, much like it is attenuated by systemic morphine administration. Alternative hypotheses are also discussed.

Sensitivity to amphetamine in prepulse inhibition response requires a mature medial prefrontal cortex.

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) refers to the modulation of the startle response by the presentation of a weaker stimulus prior to the onset of the startle stimulus. This response is consolidated along the maturation process of the mesocortical system, where the dopamine neurotransmitter plays an important role. In fact, it has been reported that agonist and antagonist dopaminergic drugs are able to change PPI expression. This study was aimed to analyze the relationship between the adult medial prefrontal cortex (mPfc) and dopaminergic involvement in PPI throughout the life span. Specifically, the present experiment analyzed the effect of the administration of dopaminergic agonist amphetamine on PPI in two different age periods in Wistar rats: postnatal day (PND) 28 and PND 70. In this last period, we also explored the relationship between PPI response and amphetamine effects after mPfc lesion. The results showed that PPI was expressed in all groups and periods; however, amphetamine only modulated this effect during adulthood. We also found that the mPfc is essential to modulate PPI after amphetamine consumption. Besides, our results suggest a role for dopamine and mPfc as important modulators of PPI in adulthood. Nevertheless, this neurotransmitter could not be involved in the expression of PPI because the administration of a dopaminergic agonist was ineffective in PND-28 period. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Reduced Prepulse Inhibition as a Biomarker of Schizophrenia.

The startle response is composed by a set of reflex behaviors intended to prepare the organism to face a potentially relevant stimulus. This response can be modulated by several factors as, for example, repeated presentations of the stimulus (startle habituation), or by previous presentation of a weak stimulus (Prepulse Inhibition [PPI]). Both phenomena appear disrupted in schizophrenia that is thought to reflect an alteration in dopaminergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission. In this paper we analyze whether the reported deficits are indicating a transient effect restricted to the acute phase of the disease, or if it reflects a more general biomarker or endophenotype of the disorder. To this end, we measured startle responses in the same set of thirteen schizophrenia patients with a cross-sectional design at two periods: 5 days after hospital admission and 3 months after discharge. The results showed that both startle habituation and PPI were impaired in the schizophrenia patients at the acute stage as compared to a control group composed by 13 healthy participants, and that PPI but not startle habituation remained disrupted when registered 3 months after the discharge. These data point to the consideration of PPI, but not startle habituation, as a schizophrenia biomarker.