Pharmacoeconomic management of patient with severe asthma in the Emergency Department: retrospective multicentric and cost of illness study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to develop a cost-of-illness model that would investigate the costs associated with the management of patients suffering from asthma and severe asthma in the context of acute episodes managed in the emergency room. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 795 records were collected between adults and paediatric patients. The data collection form reported an identification code for each patient included, gender, age, main discharge diagnosis, medical examinations carried out in the emergency room, the hospitalizations, and, if required by the patient condition, an outpatient visit performed by a pneumologist after the acute event that led the patient to the emergency room. In addition, the data collection form included information related to the pharmacological therapy taken by the patient. RESULTS: Among adult patients who had an admission with an asthma diagnosis, the average cost for the management of an adult patient in a green code in the emergency room is €330.39. As for the yellow code and the red code, the cost rises respectively to €444.04 and €808.25. The paediatric population has a slightly higher cost. As for the green code, the average cost stands at €355.87, for the yellow code €562.34 and €1,041.96 for the red code. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma and severe asthma impose a high burden on patients and society due to its chronicity, losses of productivity, and an increase in use of healthcare resources. We carried out the present observational retrospective analysis on asthma and severe asthma patients with the aim of assessing the economic impact from the Italian NHS perspective focusing also on the prescribed pharmacological therapies in the target conditions.

A seasonal pattern in the onset of polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Studies on the seasonality of onset of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) have shown conflicting results. The aim of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis is to determine from aggregated data whether there is a seasonal distribution for these diseases. METHODS: A literature search was performed using Pubmed Central and Embase scientific databases. The incidences per 6-month periods, season or month of onset, that were reported in the studies were summarised in tables considering the two diseases as separate conditions or together. The Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) for the cold period versus the warm period was pooled across studies by random effects meta-analysis weighed by inverse variance. Funnel plots and Egger test were used to explore possible publication biases. A sensitivity analysis was performed to weigh articles with a disproportionate number of patients compared to the rest. RESULTS: In the scientific literature 22 suitable papers were found: 6 on PMR with 803 patients, 11 on GCA with 2,807 patients, and 5 studies considering both diseases with 19,613 patients. There was considerable heterogeneity amongst studies regarding their quality, the classification criteria used, and the definition of onset of symptoms. No seasonal aggregation was found for GCA and PMR. The pooled IRR estimate of the meta-analysis (1.13[0.89,1.36]) showed a non-significant, higher frequency of diseases onset in the warm season. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis did not confirm a seasonal onset for PMR and GCA.

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: The Italian Society of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of polymyalgia rheumatica.

Not available.

The Italian Society of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of polymyalgia rheumatica.

OBJECTIVE: to provide evidence-based up-to-date recommendations for the management of patients with a definite diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to find the existing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on PMR and the framework of the Guidelines International Network Adaptation Working Group was used to appraise (AGREE II), synthesize, and customize the recommendations according to the needs of the Italian healthcare context. Rheumatologists on behalf of the Italian Society of Rheumatology (SIR) and from the SIR Epidemiology Unit joined the working group and identified the key health questions on PMR to guide the systematic literature review. Physicians, including general practitioners and specialists, and health professionals who manage PMR in the clinical practice were the target audience. The final recommendations were rated externally by a multi-disciplinary and multi-professional group of stakeholders. RESULTS: From the systematic search in databases (Medline, Embase) and grey literature, 3 CPGs were identified and appraised by two independent raters. Combining the statements and the evidence from these CPGs, 9 recommendations were developed by endorsement or adaptation in response to the initial key health questions. The quality of evidence was graded and the working group discussed the final recommendations in view of their implementation in the Italian healthcare context. CONCLUSIONS: In absence of national guidelines so far, these recommendations are the first to provide guidance for the management of patients with a diagnosis of PMR in Italy and they are expected to ensure the best evidence-based clinical practice for this disease.

The Italian Society of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of polymyalgia rheumatica

To provide evidence-based up-to-date recommendations for the management of patients with a defi-nite diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to find the existing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on PMR and the framework of the Guidelines International Network Adaptation Working Group was used to appraise (AGREE II), synthesize, and customize the recommendations according to the needs of the Italian healthcare context. Rheumatologists on behalf of the Italian Society of Rheumatology (SIR) and from the SIR Epidemiology Unit joined the working group and identified the key health questions on PMR to guide the systematic literature review. Physicians, including general practitioners and specialists, and health profession-als who manage PMR in the clinical practice were the target audience. The final recommendations were rated externally by a multi-disciplinary and multi-professional group of stakeholders.Results: From the systematic search in databases (Medline, Embase) and grey literature, 3 CPGs were identi-fied and appraised by two independent raters. Combining the statements and the evidence from these CPGs, 9 recommendations were developed by endorsement or adaptation in response to the initial key health questions. The quality of evidence was graded and the working group discussed the final recommendations in view of their implementation in the Italian healthcare context. Conclusions: In absence of national guidelines so far, these recommendations are the first to provide guid-ance for the management of patients with a diagnosis of PMR in Italy and they are expected to ensure the best evidence-based clinical practice for this diseas

Providing updated guidelines for the management of rheumatic diseases in Italy with the ADAPTE methodology: a project by the Italian Society for Rheumatology.

Not available.

Modelling body mass index and endometrial cancer risk in a pooled-analysis of three case-control studies.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the relation between body mass index (BMI) and endometrial cancer risk, and to describe the shape of such a relation. DESIGN: Pooled analysis of three hospital-based case-control studies. SETTING: Italy and Switzerland. POPULATION: A total of 1449 women with endometrial cancer and 3811 controls. METHODS: Multivariate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were obtained from logistic regression models. The shape of the relation was determined using a class of flexible regression models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The relation of BMI with endometrial cancer. RESULTS: Compared with women with BMI 18.5 to <25 kg/m(2) , the odds ratio was 5.73 (95% CI 4.28-7.68) for women with a BMI ≥35 kg/m(2) . The odds ratios were 1.10 (95% CI 1.09-1.12) and 1.63 (95% CI 1.52-1.75) respectively for an increment of BMI of 1 and 5 units. The relation was stronger in never-users of oral contraceptives (OR 3.35, 95% CI 2.78-4.03, for BMI ≥30 versus <25 kg/m(2) ) than in users (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.56-2.67), and in women with diabetes (OR 8.10, 95% CI 4.10-16.01, for BMI ≥30 versus <25 kg/m(2) ) than in those without diabetes (OR 2.95, 95% CI 2.44-3.56). The relation was best fitted by a cubic model, although after the exclusion of the 5% upper and lower tails, it was best fitted by a linear model. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm a role of elevated BMI in the aetiology of endometrial cancer and suggest that the risk in obese women increases in a cubic nonlinear fashion. The relation was stronger in never-users of oral contraceptives and in women with diabetes.