Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 19(6): 608-613, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29874152

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The most common complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are infectious, despite the standard use of cefazolin and metronidazole prophylaxis. Pre-operative biliary drainage (PBD) is a well-known risk factor for infectious complications. The objective was to identify the pathogens in intra-operative bile cultures in patients undergoing PD-with and without PBD-to determine the optimal antimicrobial prophylaxis regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent PD between 2009 and 2016 were identified retrospectively in three major teaching hospitals in The Netherlands. Organisms isolated from intra-operative bile cultures were studied. If pathogen coverage by standard prophylaxis was incomplete, the most appropriate alternative regimen was determined. RESULTS: Of this large cohort of 352 patients, 56% underwent PBD and 44% did not. Positive bile cultures were found in 87.9% in the PBD group, compared with 31.8% in the non-PBD group. The micro-organisms isolated most commonly were Enterococcus, Streptococcus, and Klebsiella species. Cefazolin and metronidazole were appropriate in only 71% of patients. Adding gentamicin would provide complete coverage in 99% of PBD and 100% of non-PBD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that PBD prior to PD leads to microbial colonization and antibiotic resistance. To potentially prevent infectious complications, gentamicin may be added to the standard antimicrobial prophylaxis.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Aged , Bile/microbiology , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Enterococcus , Female , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Humans , Klebsiella , Male , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Streptococcus , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome
2.
HPB (Oxford) ; 20(8): 759-767, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29571615

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the mandatory nationwide Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit, rates of major complications and Failure to Rescue (FTR) after pancreatoduodenectomy between low- and high-mortality hospitals are compared, and independent predictors for FTR investigated. METHODS: Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in 2014 and 2015 in The Netherlands were included. Hospitals were divided into quartiles based on mortality rates. The rate of major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) and death after a major complication (FTR) were compared between these quartiles. Independent predictors for FTR were identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Out of 1.342 patients, 391 (29%) developed a major complication and in-hospital mortality was 4.2%. FTR occurred in 56 (14.3%) patients. Mortality was 0.9% in the first hospital quartile (4 hospitals, 327 patients) and 8.1% in the fourth quartile (5 hospitals, 310 patients). The rate of major complications increased by 40% (25.7% vs 35.2%) between the first and fourth hospital quartile, whereas the FTR rate increased by 560% (3.6% vs 22.9%). Independent predictors of FTR were male sex (OR = 2.1, 95%CI 1.2-3.9), age >75 years (OR = 4.3, 1.8-10.2), BMI ≥30 (OR = 2.9, 1.3-6.6), histopathological diagnosis of periampullary cancer (OR = 2.0, 1.1-3.7), and hospital volume <30 (OR = 3.9, 1.6-9.6). CONCLUSIONS: Variations in mortality between hospitals after pancreatoduodenectomy were explained mainly by differences in FTR, rather than the incidence of major complications.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Neoplasms/surgery , Failure to Rescue, Health Care/trends , Healthcare Disparities/trends , Hospital Mortality/trends , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/trends , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/mortality , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Quality Indicators, Health Care/trends , Aged , Digestive System Neoplasms/mortality , Digestive System Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Audit/trends , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Netherlands/epidemiology , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/trends , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors
3.
HPB (Oxford) ; 19(10): 919-926, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28754367

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Auditing is an important tool to identify practice variation and 'best practices'. The Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit is mandatory in all 18 Dutch centers for pancreatic surgery. METHODS: Performance indicators and case-mix factors were identified by a PubMed search for randomized controlled trials (RCT's) and large series in pancreatic surgery. In addition, data dictionaries of two national audits, three institutional databases, and the Dutch national cancer registry were evaluated. Morbidity, mortality, and length of stay were analyzed of all pancreatic resections registered during the first two audit years. Case ascertainment was cross-checked with the Dutch healthcare inspectorate and key-variables validated in all centers. RESULTS: Sixteen RCT's and three large series were found. Sixteen indicators and 20 case-mix factors were included in the audit. During 2014-2015, 1785 pancreatic resections were registered including 1345 pancreatoduodenectomies. Overall in-hospital mortality was 3.6%. Following pancreatoduodenectomy, mortality was 4.1%, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III morbidity was 29.9%, median (IQR) length of stay 12 (9-18) days, and readmission rate 16.0%. In total 97.2% of >40,000 variables validated were consistent with the medical charts. CONCLUSIONS: The Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit, with high quality data, reports good outcomes of pancreatic surgery on a national level.


Subject(s)
Pancreatectomy , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Process Assessment, Health Care , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Aged , Databases, Factual , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Medical Audit , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Pancreatectomy/adverse effects , Pancreatectomy/mortality , Pancreatectomy/standards , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/mortality , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/standards , Patient Readmission , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Process Assessment, Health Care/standards , Prospective Studies , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Registries , Research Design , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...