ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This pilot study was set up to examine the effects of a continuous postoperative wound infusion system with a local anaesthetic on perioperative pain and the consumption of analgesics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 42 patients in this prospective observational pilot study. Patients were divided into two groups. One group was treated in accordance with the WHO standard pain management protocol and in addition to that received a continuous local wound infusion treatment (Group 1). Group 2 was treated with analgesics in accordance with the WHO standard pain management protocol, exclusively. RESULTS: The study demonstrated a significantly reduced postoperative VAS score for stump pain in Group 1 for the first 5 days. Furthermore, the intake of opiates was significantly reduced in Group 1 (day 1, Group 1: 42.1 vs. Group 2: 73.5, p = 0.010; day 2, Group 1: 27.7 vs. Group 2: 52.5, p = 0.012; day 3, Group 1: 23.9 vs. Group 2: 53.5, p = 0.002; day 4, Group 1: 15.7 vs. Group 2: 48.3, p = 0.003; day 5, Group 1 13.3 vs. Group 2: 49.9, p = 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups, neither in phantom pain intensity at discharge nor postoperative complications and death. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous postoperative wound infusion with a local anaesthetic in combination with a standard pain management protocol can reduce both stump pain and opiate intake in patients who have undergone transfemoral amputation. Phantom pain was not significantly affected.
Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Infusion Pumps , Ischemia/surgery , Leg/blood supply , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amputation, Surgical/methods , Female , Femur/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Leg/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Pain after thoracotomy is associated with intense discomfort leading to impaired pulmonary function. DESIGN: Prospective, non-randomized trial from April 2009 to September 2011. SETTING: Department of Thoracic Surgery, single-center. PARTICIPANTS: Thoracic surgical patients. INTERVENTIONS: Comparison of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) with the On-Q® PainBuster® system after thoracotomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The TEA group (n=30) received TEA with continuous 0.2% ropivacaine at 4 mL-to-8 mL/h, whereas Painbuster® patients (n=32) received 0.75% ropivacaine at 5 mL/h until postoperative day 4 (POD4). Basic and on-demand analgesia were identical in both groups. Pain was measured daily on a numeric analog scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) at rest and at exercise. There were no significant differences regarding demographic and preoperative data between the groups, but PainBuster® patients had a slightly lower relative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (71±20% versus 86±21%; p=0.01). Most common surgical procedures were lobectomies (38.8%) and atypical resections (28.3%) via anterolateral thoracotomy. Most common primary diagnoses were lung cancer (48.3%) and tumor of unknown origin (30%). At POD1, median postoperative pain at rest was 2.1 (1; 2.8) in the TEA group and 2 (1.5; 3.8; p=0.62) in the PainBuster® group. At exercise, median pain was 4.3 (3.5; 3.8) in the TEA group compared to 5.0 (4.0; 6.5; p=0.07). Until POD 5 there were decreases in pain at rest and exercise but without significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sufficient analgesia after thoracotomy can be achieved with the intercostal PainBuster® system in patients, who cannot receive TEA.
