Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Oncol Rep ; 25(3): 155-162, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36729252

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This study aims to assess recent literature published on the post-acute care needs of cancer patients, specifically focusing on the acute inpatient rehabilitation setting. RECENT FINDINGS: The neurologic cancer population appears to be the most studied oncologic population in acute inpatient rehabilitation studies within the past 5 years. This finding is consistent with prior findings from the past several decades. Recent trends in inpatient cancer rehabilitation note a population with lower admission functional status and shorter lengths of stay compared to prior studies. Despite these findings, the percentage discharged to the community remains high. With new treatments yielding improved survival, cancer patients may live longer and risk accumulating more functional impairments. Physicians involved in their care must understand post-acute care needs and work in a multidisciplinary group to best determine post-acute disposition. This decision remains very individualized and should consider both oncologic and functional needs.


Subject(s)
Inpatients , Neoplasms , Humans , Subacute Care , Retrospective Studies , Patient Discharge , Neoplasms/rehabilitation , Length of Stay
2.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 18(6): e938-e947, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35175783

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In patients with metastatic prostate cancer (MPC), the contribution of nonmalignant etiologies to morbidity is often overlooked. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the documented specialist assessments of back pain in men with MPC in a joint medical oncology and physiatry clinic at our tertiary cancer care center. Data on cancer disease extent, hormonal status, sites of spread, pain characteristics, physiatric examination findings, imaging, and recommended management were reviewed, extracted, and codified. For those with back pain at a site of known disease, pain etiology was classified as malignant, nonmalignant, or mixed. RESULTS: Ninety-three men were collaboratively assessed for back pain, 24 (26%) with a biochemical recurrence and 69 (74%) with MPC of whom 53 (77%) reported pain in an area of known spinal metastases including 35 (66%) metastatic castration-resistant disease and 34 (64%) a precancer history of back pain. The presenting pain symptoms of the 53 patients were activity-related in 22 (42%), radicular in eight (15%), transitional movement-related in seven (13%), biologic in five (9%), and multifactorial in 11 (21%). Overall, pain was deemed malignant in 20 (38%; five castration-sensitive, 15 metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer), nonmalignant in 12 (23%; four castration-sensitive, eight CRPC), and of mixed etiology in 21 (40%; nine castration-sensitive, 12 CRPC). CONCLUSION: Nonmalignant etiologies contributed significantly to back pain at sites of metastatic spread for 33/53 (62%) patients with MPC assessed by medical oncology and physiatry. We recommend multidisciplinary care for patients with MPC and back pain to address nonmalignant etiologies that contribute to functional compromise.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Humans , Male , Pain , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Neurooncol Pract ; 7(Suppl 1): i54-i61, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33299574

ABSTRACT

Spinal tumors pose significant treatment challenges for the physicians treating them. Understanding the location of the tumor within the intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, or extradural (epidural) space is not only critical in determining a differential diagnosis but may also provide important information about current and future neurologic deficits. Despite significant advances in the treatment of spinal tumors over the past few decades, these patients may still experience significant symptoms related to the tumor or its treatment, such as pain, weakness, impaired sensation, and bowel and bladder dysfunction. Treatment of spinal tumors should involve a multidisciplinary team of neuro-oncologists, spine surgeons, medical and radiation oncologists, physiatrists, and pain specialists to provide comprehensive oncologic management, while optimizing the patient's functional status and quality of life.

4.
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am ; 28(1): 101-114, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27912991

ABSTRACT

Spinal tumors are classically grouped into 3 categories: extradural, intradural extramedullary, and intradural intramedullary. Spinal tumors may cause spinal cord compression and vascular compromise resulting in pain or neurologic compromise. They may also alter the architecture of the spinal column, resulting in spinal instability. Oncologic management of spinal tumors varies according to the stability of the spine, neurologic status, and presence of pain. Treatment options include surgical intervention, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and hormonal manipulation. When combined with this management, rehabilitation can serve to relieve symptoms, improve quality of life, enhance functional independence, and prevent further complications in patients.


Subject(s)
Pain Management , Quality of Life , Spinal Cord Neoplasms/rehabilitation , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...