ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Psychoeducation is a cornerstone as an add-on to pharmacotherapy in standard care for individuals with bipolar disorder. However, evidence of the effectiveness of psychoeducation in low-resource settings is scarce. AIMS: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of structured group psychoeducation versus waiting list on relapse prevention for individuals with bipolar disorder in Rwanda, a low-income country. METHODS: This was a randomized open-label superiority trial. Participants aged 18 years or older with bipolar disorder were recruited at the two referral hospitals for mental health in Rwanda and randomly assigned 12 sessions of group psychoeducation or a waiting list. The program was tailored to the setting and co-designed with patients and clinicians. The follow-up period was 12 months, and the primary outcome mean number of psychiatric hospitalizations. RESULTS: In February and March 2021, 154 participants were randomly assigned to receive group psychoeducation (n = 78) or to a waiting list (n = 76). The retention rate was high, with only three discontinuing the psychoeducation once they had received a session. Despite limited use of first-line pharmacotherapy, the psychoeducation reduced the risk of hospitalization by half during the 12-month follow-up (RR: 0.50(95 % CI 0.26-0.95)). Yet, no change in medical adherence was observed. LIMITATION: Weekly assessment of clinical status was not feasible. CONCLUSION: Structured group psychoeducation for bipolar disorder in a low-resource setting has a protective effect against readmission despite limited access to first-line pharmacotherapy. Further studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of the program in more decentralized settings with less highly trained staff. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04671225.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Patient Education as Topic , Psychotherapy, Group , Humans , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Rwanda , Male , Female , Adult , Psychotherapy, Group/methods , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Middle Aged , Secondary Prevention , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Waiting ListsABSTRACT
Most descriptive data on individuals with bipolar disorder originate from high-resource settings. Very little is known about the accessibility and service provision of intensive mental health care to persons living with bipolar disorder in low-resource settings. This information is needed to inform health systems and guide practitioners to improve standard treatment options and access to treatment. This cross-sectional study explored the level of care for outpatients with bipolar disorder and their help-seeking patterns at the two national referral hospitals in Rwanda. The study found that the majority, 93%, of outpatients with bipolar disorder in Rwanda were on prophylactic psychopharmacological treatment, but mainly first-generation antipsychotics and just 3% received lithium treatment. Furthermore, there was a lack of psychosocial intervention; consequently, 44% were not aware that they had bipolar disorder. Moreover, 1 in 5 participants utilized or had previously used traditional medicine. Awareness of own diagnostic status was not associated with educational level or use of traditional medicine. The study's sample size of 154 patients is relatively small, and the cross-sectional design does not provide causal inferences. The results demonstrate a considerable unmet need for improved mental health care services for individuals with bipolar disorder in Rwanda, including access to optimal medication and psychosocial interventions. Psychoeducation could be a possible starting point for improving the standard of care, informing the individual on their diagnosis and medication while empowering them to engage in their treatment plan. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04671225. Registered on November 2020.
