High sensitivity troponin and COVID-19 outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have demonstrated high troponin levels in patients affected with COVID-19. In the present study, we aimed to determine the association between admission and peak troponin levels and COVID-19 outcomes. METHODS: This was an observational multi-ethnic multi-centre study in a UK cohort of 434 patients admitted and diagnosed COVID-19 positive, across six hospitals in London, UK during the second half of March 2020. RESULTS: Myocardial injury, defined as positive troponin during admission was observed in 288 (66.4%) patients. Age (OR: 1.68 [1.49-1.88], p < .001), hypertension (OR: 1.81 [1.10-2.99], p = .020) and moderate chronic kidney disease (OR: 9.12 [95% CI: 4.24-19.64], p < .001) independently predicted myocardial injury. After adjustment, patients with positive peak troponin were more likely to need non-invasive and mechanical ventilation (OR: 2.40 [95% CI: 1.27-4.56], p = .007, and OR: 6.81 [95% CI: 3.40-13.62], p < .001, respectively) and urgent renal replacement therapy (OR: 4.14 [95% CI: 1.34-12.78], p = .013). With regards to events, and after adjustment, positive peak troponin levels were independently associated with acute kidney injury (OR: 6.76 [95% CI: 3.40-13.47], p < .001), venous thromboembolism (OR: 11.99 [95% CI: 3.20-44.88], p < .001), development of atrial fibrillation (OR: 10.66 [95% CI: 1.33-85.32], p = .026) and death during admission (OR: 2.40 [95% CI: 1.34-4.29], p = .003). Similar associations were observed for admission troponin. In addition, median length of stay in days was shorter for patients with negative troponin levels: 8 (5-13) negative, 14 (7-23) low-positive levels and 16 (10-23) high-positive (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Admission and peak troponin appear to be predictors for cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular events and outcomes in COVID-19 patients, and their utilisation may have an impact on patient management.

Ethnicity and COVID-19 cardiovascular complications: a multi-center UK cohort.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest an association between ethnicity and COVID-19 mortality. In the present multi-center study, we aimed to assess the differences underlying this association, and ascertain whether ethnicity also mediates other aspects of COVID-19 like cardiovascular complications. METHODS: Data were collected from a mixed-ethnicity UK cohort of 613 patients admitted and diagnosed COVID-19 positive, across six hospitals in London during the second half of March 2020: 292 were White Caucasian ethnicity, 203 were Asian and 118 were of Afro-Caribbean ethnicity. RESULTS: Caucasian patients were older (P<0.001) and less likely to have hypertension (P=0.038), while Afro-Caribbean patients had higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (P<0.001). Asian patients were more likely to present with venous thromboembolic disease (adj.OR=4.10, 95% CI 1.49-11.27, P=0.006). On the other hand, Afro-Caribbean had more heart failure (adj.OR=3.64, 95% CI 1.50-8.84, P=0.004) and myocardial injury (adj.OR=2.64, 95% CI 1.10-6.35, P=0.030). Importantly, our adjusted multi-variate Cox regression analysis revealed significantly higher all-cause mortality both for Asian (adj.HR=1.89, 95% CI 1.23-2.91, P=0.004) and Afro-Caribbean ethnicity (adj.HR=2.09, 95% CI 1.30-3.37, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that COVID-19 may have different presentations and follow different clinical trajectories depending on the ethnicity of the affected subject. Awareness of complications more likely to arise in specific ethnicities will allow a more timely diagnosis and preventive measures for patients at risk. Due to increased mortality, individuals of Afro-Caribbean and Asian ethnicity should be considered as high-risk groups. This may have an impact on health-resource allocation and planning, definition of vulnerable groups, disease management, and the protection of healthcare workers at the frontline.

Serial gray scale intravascular ultrasound findings in late drug-eluting stent restenosis.

The primary aim of the present study was to assess the gray scale intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings that might be associated with late drug-eluting stent restenosis. The study included 47 patients (54 lesions) who had undergone either baseline IVUS-guided stent implantation or IVUS-guided repeat stenting to treat in-stent restenosis and then had IVUS follow-up data for ≥1.5 years afterward without any intervening procedures. The left anterior descending artery was the culprit in 59% of cases, and 50% of the lesions were at bifurcation sites. Quantitative and qualitative IVUS analyses showed a decreased minimum lumen area at follow-up from 6.0 ± 1.8 to 3.8 ± 1.4 mm(2) (p <0.0001) that was mainly due to neointimal hyperplasia with chronic stent recoil (defined as a >15% decrease in minimum stent area) in only 2 lesions and stent fracture in only 5 lesions. Calcified neointima appeared in 12 lesions, mostly in the form of macrocalcification, and was associated with increased calcium both behind the stent and in the reference segment. In conclusion, late drug-eluting stent restenosis showed neointimal calcification in 20% of cases, and chronic stent recoil was rare.

Intravascular ultrasound comparison of left main coronary artery disease between white and Asian patients.

We assessed the ethnic differences in coronary atherosclerosis lesion morphology between white and Asian patients. Our hypothesis was that left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease was more focal and less complex in Asian than in Western white patients. We studied 99 Asian patients (Japan and South Korea) and 99 matched control United States white patients with a stable clinical presentation and >30% LMCA angiographic diameter stenosis by visual estimation. The matching parameters included age, gender, and diabetes mellitus. The vessel and lumen areas and calcium arc were analyzed every 0.5 mm and normalized for analysis length. Overall, 75.1% of the patients were men and 34.1% had diabetes. The patient age was 68.0 ± 10 years, with no differences between the Asian and white patients. The Asian patients had a lower prevalence of hyperlipidemia than the white patients (41.4% vs 81.8%; p <0.0001) and were smaller in size, and the white patients were more obese (body mass index 23.7 ± 2.6 vs 27.6 ± 4.1 kg/m(2), p <0.0001). The Asian patients had a smaller lumen area (5.2 ± 1.8 vs 6.2 ± 14 mm(2); p <0.0001), larger vessel area (20.0 ± 4.9 vs 18.4 ± 4.4 mm(2); p <0.0001), and larger plaque burden (72 ± 10 vs 64 ± 12%: p <0.0001) at the minimum lumen site and over the entire LMCA length. The white patients had more calcification, whether assessed by the maximum arc (82° ± 74° vs 49° ± 45°; p <0.0001) or total length (3.6 ± 3.2 vs 2.1 ± 2.1 mm; p <0.0001). In conclusion, after matching well-known risk factors, there appeared to be ethnic differences in coronary atherosclerosis morphology between Asian and white patients, at least as it affected LMCA morphology.