Impact of Discontinuing Both Hypertonic Saline and Dornase Alfa After Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Cystic Fibrosis.

Rationale Evaluating approaches to reduce treatment burden is a research priority among people with CF (pwCF) on highly effective modulators including elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI). Objective To evaluate the impact of discontinuing both hypertonic saline (HS) and dornase alfa (DA) versus continuing both therapies among a subgroup of participants in the SIMPLIFY study who sequentially participated in trials evaluating the independent clinical effects of discontinuing HS and DA. Methods SIMPLIFY participants ≥12 years old on ETI and comprising a subgroup using both HS and DA at study entry were randomized to the HS or DA trial, and then randomized 1:1 to continue or discontinue the applicable therapy for 6 weeks. After completion of the first trial, eligible participants could enroll in the second trial beginning with a 2-week run in. Study outcomes were compared across the duration of SIMPLIFY participation between a cohort remaining on both therapies during SIMPLIFY versus a cohort that sequentially discontinued both as a result of trial randomizations. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate treatment differences, adjusted for time between trials, trial order, baseline age, sex at birth and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (ppFEV1) at study entry. Results There were 43 participants who discontinued both therapies by the end of SIMPLIFY and 63 who remained on both, with overall average ppFEV1 at study entry 96.7% and average duration of follow up from beginning of the first trial to completion of the second trial 3.9 months, including time between trials. No clinically meaningful difference in the change in ppFEV1 from baseline to completion of the second trial was observed between those who discontinued versus remained on both therapies (difference: 0.22% Off-On, 95% CI: -1.60,2.03). Changes in LCI2.5, patient reported, and safety outcomes were also comparable. Patient reported treatment burden, as measured by a CFQ-R subscale, significantly decreased in those discontinuing both therapies. Conclusions SIMPLIFY participants who sequentially discontinued both HS and DA experienced no meaningful changes in clinical outcomes and reported decreased treatment burden as compared to those who remained on both therapies. These data continue to inform a new era of post-modulator care of pwCF.

Re-examining baseline lung function recovery following IV-treated pulmonary exacerbations.

CF registry pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) analyses have employed "before and after" spirometry recovery, where the best percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1) prior to PEx ("baseline") is compared to the best ppFEV1 <3 months post-PEx. This methodology lacks comparators and ascribes recovery failure to PEx. Herein, we describe 2014 CF Foundation Patient Registry PEx analyses including a comparator: recovery around nonPEx events, birthdays. 49.6% of 7357 individuals with PEx achieved baseline ppFEV1 recovery while 36.6% of 14,141 achieved baseline recovery after birthdays; individuals with both PEx and birthdays were more likely to recover baseline after PEx than after birthdays (47% versus 34%); mean ppFEV1 declines were 0.3 (SD=9.3) and 3.1 (9.3), respectively. Post-event measure number had more effect on baseline recovery than did real ppFEV1 loss in simulations, suggesting that PEx recovery analyses lacking comparators are prone to artifact and poorly describe PEx contributions to disease progression.

Discontinuation versus continuation of hypertonic saline or dornase alfa in modulator treated people with cystic fibrosis (SIMPLIFY): results from two parallel, multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trials.

BACKGROUND: Reducing treatment burden is a priority for people with cystic fibrosis, whose health has benefited from using new modulators that substantially increase CFTR protein function. The SIMPLIFY study aimed to assess the effects of discontinuing nebulised hypertonic saline or dornase alfa in individuals using the CFTR modulator elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor (ETI). METHODS: The SIMPLIFY study included two parallel, multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trials at 80 participating clinics across the USA in the Cystic Fibrosis Therapeutics Development Network. We included individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 12-17 years with percent predicted FEV1 (ppFEV1) of 70% or more, or those aged 18 years or older with ppFEV1 of 60% or more, if they had been taking ETI and either (or both) mucoactive therapies (≥3% hypertonic saline or dornase alfa) for at least 90 days before screening. Participants on both hypertonic saline and dornase alfa were randomly assigned to one of the two trials, and those on a single therapy were assigned to the applicable trial. All participants were then randomly assigned 1:1 to continue or discontinue therapy for 6 weeks using permuted blocks of varying size, stratified by baseline ppFEV1 (week 0; ≥90% or <90%), single or concurrent use of hypertonic saline and dornase alfa, previous SIMPLIFY study participation (yes or no), and age (≥18 or <18 years). For participants randomly assigned to continue their therapy during a given trial, this therapy was instructed to be taken at least once daily according to each participant's pre-existing, clinically prescribed regimen. Hypertonic saline concentration was required to be at least 3%. The primary objective for each trial was to determine whether discontinuing was non-inferior to continuing, measured by the 6-week change in ppFEV1 in the per-protocol population. We established a non-inferiority margin of -3% for the difference between groups in the 6-week change in ppFEV1. Safety outcomes were analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04378153. FINDINGS: From Aug 25, 2020, to May 25, 2022, a total of 672 unique participants were screened for eligibility for one or both trials, resulting in 847 total random assignments across both trials with 594 unique participants. 370 participants were randomly assigned in the hypertonic saline trial and 477 in the dornase alfa trial. Participants across both trials had an average ppFEV1 of 96·9%. Discontinuing treatment was non-inferior to continuing treatment with respect to the absolute 6-week change in ppFEV1 in both the hypertonic saline trial (-0·19% [95% CI -0·85 to 0·48] in the discontinuation group [n=133] vs 0·14% [-0·51 to 0·78] in the continuation group [n=140]; between-group difference -0·32% [-1·25 to 0·60]) and dornase alfa trial (0·18% [-0·38 to 0·74] in the discontinuation group [n=199] vs -0·16% [-0·73 to 0·41] in the continuation group [n=193]; between-group difference 0·35% [-0·45 to 1·14]), with consistent results in the intention-to-treat populations. In the hypertonic saline trial, 64 (35%) of 184 in the discontinuation group versus 44 (24%) of 186 participants in the continuation group and, in the dornase alfa trial, 89 (37%) of 240 in the discontinuation group versus 55 (23%) of 237 in the continuation group had at least one adverse event. INTERPRETATION: In individuals with cystic fibrosis on ETI with relatively well preserved pulmonary function, discontinuing daily hypertonic saline or dornase alfa for 6 weeks did not result in clinically meaningful differences in pulmonary function when compared with continuing treatment.

Variation in time to notification of enrollment and rates of withdrawal in resuscitation trials conducted under exception from informed consent.

IMPORTANCE: Emergency research is challenging to do well as it involves time sensitive interventions in unstable patients. There is limited time to obtain informed consent from the patient or their legally authorized representative (LAR). Such research is permitted under exception from informed consent (EFIC) if specific criteria are met, including notification after enrollment. Some question whether the risks of EFIC outweighs its benefits. To date, there is limited empiric information about time to notification (TTN) and rates of withdrawal in such trials. OBJECTIVE: To describe variation in TTN and rates of withdrawal among that patients enrolled in EFIC trials over a twelve-year period. DESIGN: We performed post hoc descriptive analyses of data from five trials conducted under EFIC. SETTING: Emergency medical services and receiving hospitals participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium in the United States and Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest or life-threatening traumatic injury. EXPOSURES: Notification strategies were specified at each site before initiation of enrollment by a local institutional review board. We monitored TTN within each site centrally throughout each study's enrollment period. OUTCOMES: TTN was defined as time from randomization to first-reported notification of patient or LAR of enrollment. Withdrawal was defined as patient or LAR opt out of ongoing participation at the time of notification. RESULTS: Of 35,442 patients enrolled in five trials, 33,805 had cardiac arrest; and 1636 had traumatic injury. TTN varied overall and by patient outcome. Among those with cardiac arrest, TTN ranged from median (5%ile, 95%ile) of 6 (1,27) days to 28 (2, 53) days across sites. 0.3% of notified patients with cardiac arrest withdrew. Among those with traumatic injury, TTN ranged from 0 (0, 5) days to 36 (5, 68) days across sites. 7.7% of notified patients with traumatic injury withdrew. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There is large variation in TTN in trials conducted under EFIC for emergency research. This may be due to several factors. It may or may not be modifiable. Overall rates of withdrawal are low, which suggests current practices related to EFIC are acceptable to those who have participated in emergency research.

Capuchins (Sapajus apella) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) fail to attend to the functional spatial relationship between a tool and a reward.

Capuchins (Sapajus apella) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) participated in 3 experiments in which they were presented with 2 objects, one appropriately oriented and the other inappropriately oriented to retrieve a food reward by pulling, replicating prior experiments with nonhuman primates described as evaluating "tool choice." Choice patterns were analyzed to assess whether monkeys learned that tools needed to be oriented with part of the tool on the far side of the reward to pull in the food. Both species learned to choose appropriately oriented tools after a similar number of sessions with a cane-shaped tool in the first task. Both species also transferred to a new tool shape in the second task, but squirrel monkeys' performance on particular trials suggested they did not use the functional relationship between the tool and the food to guide their choices. Tool shapes and configurations in the final task were designed to control for the potential use of extraneous spatial cues. Neither capuchins nor squirrel monkeys chose appropriately oriented tools above chance in control trials. Results suggest both species relied on other spatial cues to perform in previous tasks rather than learning to attend to the functional spatial relationship between a tool and a reward. Species differences emerged in the second task only, as capuchins mastered performance with the new tool shape faster than squirrel monkeys and seemed to use a more complex set of rules to guide their choices. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Oral Azithromycin Use and the Recovery of Lung Function from Pulmonary Exacerbations Treated with Intravenous Tobramycin or Colistimethate in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis.

Rationale: The potential of azithromycin to alter the antimicrobial and clinical benefits of inhaled tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) has been previously reported. The potential interaction between azithromycin and intravenous antibiotics in the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations is unknown. Objectives: To determine if chronic azithromycin use as a concomitant therapy is associated with change in lung function after receiving intravenous antibiotic regimens including tobramycin or colistimethate. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating the association of azithromycin with intravenous tobramycin or colistimethate in adult patients with CF treated for a pulmonary exacerbation. The primary outcome was relative lung function recovery (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]) after exacerbation treatment. Generalized estimating equations were applied to account for repeated events with independent correlation structures and robust standard errors, incorporating several confounders. Results: A total of 220 exacerbation events occurred in 121 patients in the tobramycin group (47% using azithromycin), and 207 exacerbation events occurred in 86 patients in the colistimethate group (59% using azithromycin). Azithromycin use was associated with less FEV1% recovery in patients treated with tobramycin (-3% relative FEV1% recovery [95% confidence interval (CI), -7 to 0.2] and -2.64% absolute FEV1% change [95% CI, -4.52 to -0.76]). Azithromycin use was associated with greater recovery of FEV1% when treated with colistimethate (+3% relative FEV1% recovery [95% CI, -0.1 to 7] and 2.00% absolute improvement in FEV1% [95% CI, 0.13 to 3.87]). The odds of 90% or 100% recovery to baseline FEV1% were lower with azithromycin use in the tobramycin cohort and higher with azithromycin use in the colistimethate cohort but were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Azithromycin use was associated with a more favorable response in adult patients with CF treated with intravenous colistimethate but a less favorable response in those treated with intravenous tobramycin.