Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 34(5): 898-906, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34535515

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted to assess family physicians' perception of the US Food and Drug Administration-approved mRNA Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, their plans to be vaccinated with an approved mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, and their support for vaccination of patients and family members. METHODS: The authors conducted a cross-sectional survey of 307 practicing family physicians, full-time faculty physicians, and resident physicians in Kansas from December 14, 2020, to December 31, 2020. The study participants completed an anonymous, 20-item survey assessing family physicians' concerns about exposure to COVID-19 and their perceptions of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to control SARS-CoV-2. A mixed-method approach was used to collect, analyze, and interpret the data. RESULTS: There was a 51.1% response rate. The proportion of family physicians who reported their intentions to be vaccinated for COVID-19 was significantly higher than those who were hesitant to receive the mRNA vaccines (90.6% vs 9.4%; χ2 [1, n = 307] = 201.9.1; P < .0001). Among those who were willing to be vaccinated with an approved mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, the main reasons were to prevent COVID-19 infection; protect self, family, and community; contribute to herd immunity; inspire confidence that the vaccines are safe and end the pandemic and bring life back to normal. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a significantly positive association between a physician's concerns and their willingness to be vaccinated with an approved mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. With the authorization of 2 new mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, future studies should investigate the number of physicians in our study who received the vaccine.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Perception , Physicians, Family , RNA, Messenger , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21255130

ABSTRACT

Serologic testing for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies can be used to confirm diagnosis, estimate seroprevalence, screen convalescent plasma donors, and assess vaccine efficacy. Several logistical and infrastructure challenges limit access to SARS-CoV-2 serologic testing. Dried blood spot (DBS) samples have been used for serology testing of various diseases in resource-limited settings. We examined the use of DBS samples and capillary blood (fingerstick) plasma collected in Microtainer tubes for SARS-CoV-2 testing with the automated Abbott ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG (List 6R86) and IgM assays and use of venous whole blood with a prototype PANBIO rapid point-of-care lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay. The ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay was initially optimized for use with DBS, venous and capillary plasma, and venous whole blood collected from patients with symptoms and PCR-confirmed COVID-19 and negative asymptomatic controls. Assay linearity and reproducibility was confirmed with 3 contrived DBS samples, with sample stability and signal recovery after 14 days at room temperature. ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM assay results showed high concordance between fingerstick DBS and venous DBS samples, and between fingerstick DBS and venous whole blood samples (n=61). Discordant results were seen in 3 participants (2 IgG, 1 IgM) who were in the process of seroreversion at the time of sample collection and had results near the assay cutoff. Use of fingerstick plasma collected in Microtainer tubes (n=109) showed 100% concordant results (R2=0.997) with matched patient venous plasma on the ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay. High concordance of assay results (92.9% positive, 100% negative) was also observed for the PANBIO SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay compared to the ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay run with matched venous plasma (n=61). Fingerstick DBS and plasma samples are easy and inexpensive to collect and, along with the use of rapid point-of-care testing platforms, will expand access to SARS-CoV-2 serology testing, particularly in resource-limited areas.

3.
Spine Deform ; 8(4): 605-611, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32162197

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess the role of insurance type, geographic socioeconomic status, and ethnicity in AIS disease severity in a state with mandated scoliosis screenings. Early detection of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is associated with reduced curve progression, surgical treatment, and long-term sequelae. Type of insurance, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status are important determinants in healthcare access. METHODS: Data were obtained for 561 AIS patients aged 10-18 years, living within a single county, and presenting to a single healthcare system for initial evaluation of AIS between 2010 and 2016 that met inclusion criteria. Demographic data including gender, age, self-reported ethnicity, insurance, and zip code were collected. Outcome measures included Cobb angle, curve severity, and referral delay. A single fellowship-trained pediatric orthopedic surgeon calculated presenting Cobb angle for each case. Zip code was used as a proxy for household income level. Independent sample t tests, analysis of variance and covariance, and χ2 analysis were used to determine the significant differences and correlations. RESULTS: Female patients (n = 326, CA = 22.4°) had significantly greater Cobb angle measurements compared with male patients (n = 117, CA = 18.1°). Patients with government-supported insurance had significantly higher Cobb angles (CA = 22.1°) than privately insured patients (CA = 19.2°) but were both classified within the "mild" range clinically, and are likely not clinically significant. There was no correlation between income level and Cobb angle. Referral delay and Cobb angle severity did not vary by age, income, or insurance. A χ2 analysis showed no association between Cobb angle and race. CONCLUSIONS: Cobb angle severity was not influenced by SES factors, including ethnicity and household income. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-II.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Healthcare Disparities , Negative Results , Scoliosis/pathology , Social Class , Thoracic Vertebrae/pathology , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Delayed Diagnosis , Female , Humans , Insurance, Health , Male , Racial Groups , Retrospective Studies , Scoliosis/ethnology , Scoliosis/surgery , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors
4.
Paediatr Respir Rev ; 1(1): 14-20, 2000 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16263437

ABSTRACT

The treatment of bacterial pneumonia can occur either in the community or hospital setting depending on the clinical status of the child. In the community, supportive management includes anti-pyretics, analgesia and early review by a medical practitioner if there is deterioration or no response to oral antibiotics within 48 hours. Suitable first-line antibiotics in the under fives are penicillin- or cephalosporin-based and in the over fives macrolides may also be considered. In a severely ill child, good oxygenation is essential and oxygen may be delivered by mask, nasal prong or headbox. Persistent fever, despite appropriate treatment warrants further investigations. The most common complication is an empyema and treatment is effective drainage with continuing high-dose antibiotics. Other lung complications include abscess formation and pneumatoceles. The syndrome of inappropriate anti-diuretic hormone secretion occurs in approximately one third of hospitalized patients with pneumonia. A rare but important complication is pericarditis.


Subject(s)
Pneumonia, Bacterial/complications , Pneumonia, Bacterial/therapy , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis
5.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm ; 12(1-2): 33-45, 1975 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-809370

ABSTRACT

Management of heroin addiction with oral methadone continues to create controversy. Since the first Dole-Nyswander experiments were reported almost a decade ago, methadone maintenance programs have been started in every major city in North America at an estimated public cost in the hundreds of millions of tax dollars. By the end of 1972, the United States alone spending at an annual rate in excess of $250 million, and an expenditure rate in excess of one billion dollars was occurring by the end of 1973. Despite the FDA investigational New Drug status of methadone when used for this purpose, objective data have still not been generated to substantiate the worth of Narcotic Substitution Therapy. Iatrogenic consequences are on the increase, and scepticism is growing among most pharmacologists. A critical evaluation of the entire methadone maintenance approach is being advocated by many and being attempted by some. Data currently being generated at the Philadelphia General Hospital suggest that many patients may have been better managed without methadone.


Subject(s)
Heroin Dependence/rehabilitation , Methadone/therapeutic use , Adult , Deception , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Health Expenditures , Humans , Male , Methadone/adverse effects , Methadone/urine , Morphine/urine , Patient Compliance , Research , Socioeconomic Factors , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...