Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pediatr Health Care ; 33(4): e19-e27, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31227124

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Postpartum depression (PPD) affects up to 20% of American mothers and, if left untreated, can have serious, lifelong effects on women and their children. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that pediatric practices screen for PPD at the 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-month well-child checks; however, few pediatric practices oblige. METHODS: This project standardized the PPD screening schedule and developed a novel referral algorithm that was concurrently implemented in a rural primary care pediatric practice. RESULTS: The project significantly increased the clinic's screening rate from 33% to 80% (p < .001) and improved referral rates from 66% to 79%. DISCUSSION: By standardizing PPD screening and implementing a referral algorithm in the ambulatory pediatric setting, more PPD cases can be identified, further evaluated, and, hopefully, treated to improve maternal and infant health outcomes.


Subject(s)
Depression, Postpartum/diagnosis , Mass Screening , Pediatrics/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Quality Improvement , Referral and Consultation , Algorithms , Depression, Postpartum/therapy , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Mass Screening/methods , Social Stigma , Young Adult
2.
EGEMS (Wash DC) ; 6(1): 9, 2018 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30094281

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study was performed to better characterize accessibility to electronic health records (EHRs) among informatics professionals in various roles, settings, and organizations across the United States and internationally. BACKGROUND: The EHR landscape has evolved significantly in recent years, though challenges remain in key areas such as usability. While patient access to electronic health information has gained more attention, levels of access among informatics professionals, including those conducting usability research, have not been well described in the literature. Ironically, many informatics professionals whose aim is to improve EHR design have restrictions on EHR access or publication, which interfere with broad dissemination of findings in areas of usability research. METHODS: To quantify the limitations on EHR access and publication rights, we conducted a survey of informatics professionals from a broad spectrum of roles including practicing clinicians, researchers, administrators, and members of industry. Results were analyzed and levels of EHR access were stratified by role, organizational affiliation, geographic region, EHR type, and restrictions with regard to publishing results of usability testing, including screenshots. RESULTS: 126 respondents completed the survey, representing all major geographic regions in the United States. 71.5 percent of participants reported some level of EHR access, while 13 percent reported no access whatsoever. Rates of no-access were higher among faculty members and researchers (19 percent). Among faculty members and researchers, 72 percent could access the EHR for usability and/or research purposes, but, of those, fewer than 1 in 3 could freely publish screenshots with results of usability testing and half could not publish such data at all. Across users from all roles, only 21 percent reported the ability to publish screenshots freely without restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers insight into current patterns of EHR accessibility among informatics professionals, highlighting restrictions that limit dissemination of usability research and testing. Further conversations and shared responsibility among the various stakeholders in industry, government, health care organizations, and informatics professionals are vital to continued EHR optimization.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...