Cross-sectional study to assess the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with monoclonal gammopathies

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is the most effective strategy to protect patients with haematologic malignancies against severe COVID-19, but primary vaccine responses are less effective in this population. Here, we characterized the humoral responses following 3 months after mRNA-based vaccines in patients at different stages of the same plasma cell diseases, including monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) and multiple myeloma on first line therapy (MM), compared to a healthy control population matched by sex and age. We observed that plasmas from uninfected MM patients after 3 months post-vaccine have lower SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG and IgA antibodies and decreased neutralization capacity compared with MGUS and SMM individuals, and a group of healthy controls. Importantly, we detected significantly higher plasma neutralization capacity in MM individuals who recovered from COVID-19 compared to their uninfected counterparts, highlighting that hybrid immunity elicit stronger immune responses even in this immunocompromised population. In contrast to MM group, no differences in the vaccine-induced humoral response were observed between uninfected MGUS, SMM and healthy individuals. In conclusion, a booster vaccine dose is recommended in uninfected MM patients to develop an adequate and effective humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Limited immune responses after three months of BNT162b2 vaccine in SARS-CoV-2 uninfected elders living in long-term care facilities

BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 vaccination is the most effective strategy to protect elders living in long-term care facilities (LTCF) against severe COVID-19, but primary vaccine responses are less effective in older adults. Here, we characterized the humoral responses following 3 months after mRNA/BNT162b2 vaccine in institutionalized elders. MethodsPlasma levels of specific SARS-CoV-2 total IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies were measured before and 3 months after vaccination in elders living in LTCF. Neutralization capacity was assessed in a pseudovirus neutralization assay against WH1 (original) and B.1.617.2/Delta variants. A group of younger adults was used as reference group. ResultsThree months after vaccination, uninfected-elders presented reduced specific SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels and significantly lower neutralization capacity against the WH1 and Delta virus compared to vaccinated uninfected younger individuals. In contrast, COVID-19 recovered elders showed significantly higher specific SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels after vaccination than younger counterparts, while showing similar neutralization activity against WH1 virus and increased neutralization capacity against Delta variant. Despite previously infected elders elicit potent cross-reactive immune responses similarly to younger individuals, higher quantities of specific SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies are required to reach the same neutralization levels. ConclusionsWhile hybrid immunity seems to be active in previously infected elders after three months from mRNA/BNT162b2 vaccination, humoral immune responses are diminished in COVID-19 uninfected vaccinated residents living in LTCF. These results suggests that a vaccine booster dose should be prioritized for this particularly vulnerable population. Word summaryWhile previously infected and vaccinated elders living in LTCF had comparable neutralizing antibody levels to younger individuals, vaccinated uninfected-residents showed limited neutralization capacity against both original and delta variants. Hybrid immunity seems to be active in elders and can be relevant to design vaccine boosting campaigns.

Clinical course impacts early kinetics and long-term magnitude and amplitude of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies beyond one year after infection

BackgroundUnderstanding the determinants of long-term immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 and the concurrent impact of vaccination and emerging variants of concern will guide optimal strategies to achieve global protection against the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsA prospective cohort of 332 COVID-19 patients was followed beyond one year. Plasma neutralizing activity was evaluated using HIV-based reporter pseudoviruses expressing different SARS-CoV-2 spikes and was longitudinally analyzed using mixed-effects models. FindingsLong-term neutralizing activity was stable beyond one year after infection in mild/asymptomatic and hospitalized participants. However, longitudinal models suggest that hospitalized individuals generate both short- and long-lived memory B cells, while outpatient responses were dominated by long-lived B cells. In both groups, vaccination boosted responses to natural infection, although viral variants, mainly B.1.351, reduced the efficacy of neutralization. Importantly, despite showing higher neutralization titers, hospitalized patients showed lower cross-neutralization of B.1.351 variant compared to outpatients. Multivariate analysis identified severity of primary infection as the factor that independently determines both the magnitude and the inferior cross-neutralization activity of long-term neutralizing responses. ConclusionsNeutralizing response induced by SARS-CoV-2 is heterogeneous in magnitude but stable beyond one year after infection. Vaccination boosts these long-lasting natural neutralizing responses, counteracting the significant resistance to neutralization of new viral variants. Severity of primary infection determines higher magnitude but poorer quality of long-term neutralizing responses.

Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection increases B.1.1.7 cross-neutralization by vaccinated individuals.

To assess the potential impact of predominant circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants on neutralizing activity of infected and/or vaccinated individuals, we analyzed neutralization of pseudoviruses expressing the spike of the original Wuhan strain, the D614G and B.1.1.7 variants. Our data show that parameters of natural infection (time from infection and infecting variant) determined cross-neutralization. Importantly, upon vaccination, previously infected individuals developed equivalent B.1.1.7 and Wuhan neutralizing responses. In contrast, uninfected vaccinees showed reduced neutralization against B.1.1.7. FundingThis study was funded by Grifols, the Departament de Salut of the Generalitat de Catalunya, the Spanish Health Institute Carlos III, CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya, and the crowdfunding initiatives #joemcorono, BonPreu/Esclat and Correos.

Vivência das mulheres diagnosticadas com câncer de colo de útero submetidas a tratamento cirúrgico / Experience of women diagnosed with cervical cancer submitted to surgical treatment

Objetivo: conhecer como as mulheres diagnosticadas com Câncer de Colo de Útero (CCU) vivenciam o diagnóstico, tratamento cirúrgico e seu retorno às atividades diárias. Método: estudo descritivo, de abordagem qualitativa, desenvolvido por meio de entrevista semiestruturada. As entrevistas gravadas foram transcritas e submetidas à técnica de Análise de Conteúdo, na modalidade Análise Temática. Resultados: emergiram quatro categorias: >; >; > e >. As mulheres apresentam medo, ansiedade e angústia perante o diagnóstico e o apoio familiar, a fé e o vínculo com os profissionais da saúde proporcionam conforto na fase de tratamento. Houve receio no retorno às atividades sexuais. Conclusão: a realização deste estudo ampliou o conhecimento das facetas que permeiam as vivências do diagnóstico, tratamento e retorno às atividades diárias por mulheres após tratamento cirúrgico de Câncer de Colo de Útero.