Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 38(10): 868-873, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36067795

ABSTRACT

Aim: To assess the effect of bariatric surgery on the lean mass of women after one year of the procedure, comparing its outcomes upon the classification from both the Foundation of the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) and the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in the Elderly People (EWGSOP). Material and methods: Twenty-eight obese women aged 40.5 ± 9.8 yrs who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were included. 27 of them were reassessed after 6 months of surgery, and 16 completed the one-year follow-up. Pre-sarcopenia condition was assessed through a handgrip strength test and body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Total body mass, body mass index, and lean mass (LM) were collected prior to, 6 and 12 months after RYGB surgery. Results: All subjects reassessed after 12 months were diagnosed with pre-sarcopenia according to the FNIH classification criteria, while according to the EWGSOP2 Consensus they presented normal values. LM represented 14% of the influence on handgrip strength (p = .049) after 6 months of surgery; however, its influence on strength after 12 months increased to 30% (p = .028). Conclusion: The FNIH classification is the most effective criteria since it uses LM content as the first test, considering that strength capacity needs more time to be affected by the surgical procedure. On the other hand, the EWGSOP2 classification should not be applied to determine the loss of LM in younger populations regardless of what may have caused such changes.


Subject(s)
Gastric Bypass , Sarcopenia , Aged , Female , Humans , United States , Sarcopenia/diagnostic imaging , Sarcopenia/etiology , Hand Strength , Absorptiometry, Photon/adverse effects , Gastric Bypass/adverse effects , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Prevalence
2.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 38(11): 983-987, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36150398

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between postural changes, osteoarthritis (OA) and bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women. METHODS: A total of 127 Brazilian women, aged 45 years or older, were included in this retrospective study. Subjects were divided in two groups: study group with postural changes (SG) and control group without postural changes (CG). Possible postural changes considered were scoliosis, kyphosis and lordosis. All women underwent BMD assessment and OA was identified at the region of the hip and lumbar spine by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis. RESULTS: SG was older (66.0 ± 7.3 years) than the CG (61.0 ± 8.6 years). In the entire sample we found thirteen women with OA and low BMD. Overall, the lumbar spine area was more affected by OA than the hip. The value of BMD T-score accounted for up to 77% of the changes observed in the SG group. CONCLUSION: Postural changes identified in women are directly related to aging and associated with bone loss and joint degeneration. Postural changes may be the primary sign of frailty as a result of body adaptation to pain related to musculoskeletal diseases.


Subject(s)
Bone Diseases, Metabolic , Osteoarthritis , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal , Female , Humans , Bone Density , Retrospective Studies , Postmenopause , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Absorptiometry, Photon , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/diagnostic imaging
3.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 37(10): 902-905, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33975504

ABSTRACT

AIM: To analyze the influence of body components on bone mineral density (BMD) in women from perimenopause to old age. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 117 women were allocated into three groups according to the reproductive stage (STRAW): perimenopausal (PEM, N = 28, mean age 44.8 ± 3.6), early postmenopausal (EPM, N = 36, mean age 51.4 ± 2.8) and late postmenopausal (LPM, N = 53; mean age 64.0 ± 1.7). Total body mass, body mass index (BMI), lean mass (LM), fat mass (FM), fat percentage (FP) and BMD at the lumbar spine (lBMD) and femoral neck (fBMD) were assessed. RESULTS: BMI, FM, LM and BMD values decreased from PEM to LPM. The total effect of FM on fBMD and lBMD was of 42% and 8% for PEM, 28% and 33% for EMP and 9% and 1% for LPM respectively. Additionally, the total effect of LM on fBMD and lBMD was 48% and 3% for PEM, 54% and 53% for EMP and 9% and 11% for LPM women respectively. CONCLUSION: BMI, LM, and FM decreased with aging. All these components had great influence on both fBMD and lBMD in EMP women. Conversely, in PEM these parameters only had influence on femoral BMD, but not on lumbar spine. These data suggests that LM is the most important component in BMD for women older than 50 years old, particularly in the hip.


Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Anthropometry , Bone Density/physiology , Perimenopause/physiology , Postmenopause/physiology , Adult , Aged , Body Composition/physiology , Body Mass Index , Female , Femur Neck , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae , Middle Aged , Thinness/physiopathology
4.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 36(7): 578-581, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32406280

ABSTRACT

Aim: To analyze the effects of body weight loss on bone mineral density (BMD) on hip (Hip BMD) and lumbar spine (Lumbar BMD) after six months of bariatric surgery. Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for morbid obesity. Nonetheless, there are scant data on the effect of weight bearing on bone structure.Material and methods: Seventeen obese women aged 41.2 ± 11.3 yrs. who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were included. Body composition assessments were performed through dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry immediately before and after 6-months RYGB. Data collected pre- and post-RYGB included total body weight, body mass index (BMI), lean body mass (LM), fat mass (FM) and bone mineral content. The pre- (PRE) and post-operative (POST) results were compared.Results: Lumbar BMD POST presented a non-significant loss of 1.8% whereas Hip BMD POST showed a significant loss of 17.8%. The analysis demonstrated that BMI and LM PRE explained 26% and 49%, respectively, of Hip BMD PRE variability. In addition, LM POST explained 30% of hip BMD POST variability and was not significant for Lumbar BMD POST.Conclusions: Obesity and rapid weight loss showed direct influence in Hip BMD after six months of bariatric surgery. However, its effect on the lumbar spine area was smaller due to the higher capacity of the spine to dissipate loads through its curvature.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery/adverse effects , Body Composition/physiology , Bone Density/physiology , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Absorptiometry, Photon , Adult , Bariatric Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Body Mass Index , Brazil/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastric Bypass/adverse effects , Gastric Bypass/statistics & numerical data , Hip , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Lumbar Vertebrae , Middle Aged , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Obesity, Morbid/metabolism , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...