Disc-damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS) as a Clinical Indicator of the Presence of a Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD).

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical parameters and their relationship to the presence of a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 672 consecutive patients who presented to the Glaucoma Service at Wills Eye Hospital from January 1 through May 29, 2012. Swinging flashlight method (SFM) was used to test for RAPDs. Records of visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), disc-damage likelihood scale (DDLS), cup/disc (C/D) ratio, visual field mean deviation (MD), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and Heidelberg retinal tomography (HRT) asymmetries were examined. We measured the prevalence of RAPDs as clinical asymmetries increase, calculated cut-off points for clinical asymmetries that optimized sensitivity and specificity in detecting RAPDs, and determined values of clinical asymmetries above which a RAPD always exists. RESULTS: Upon exclusion, we studied 409 patients, 175 (42.8%) with RAPDs and 234 (57.2%) without. Age, visual acuity, IOP, DDLS, C/D ratio, MD, retina nerve fiber layer thickness by OCT, HRT C/D, and HRT rim area asymmetries all correlated with RAPD status (OCT and HRT parameters did not include enough patients for multivariable analysis or cut-off determination). Multivariable analysis indicated that IOP, DDLS, and MD asymmetries were significantly correlated with RAPD status (P-value<0.05). Although the optimal cut-off values for the variables retained in the final multivariable model had low sensitivity and moderate specificity, DDLS had the highest specificity of 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: IOP, DDLS, and MD asymmetries had the best correlation with RAPD status, and increased asymmetries in these parameters were associated with higher likelihood of RAPDs. DDLS score had the highest specificity in predicting a RAPD, and DDLS asymmetry scores ≥6 identified all cases of RAPDs.

Comparison of 3 different releasable suture techniques in trabeculectomy.

PURPOSE: The use of releasable sutures provides an effective and simple way of titrating intraocular pressure (IOP) postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of 3 releasable suture techniques for closing scleral flaps in patients undergoing primary trabeculectomy. METHODS: The Wills Eye Glaucoma Research Center retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent primary trabeculectomy by 3 surgeons using 3 different releasable suture techniques. Ninety eyes of 90 glaucoma patients were divided into 3 groups by releasable suture technique (n = 30 eyes for each group). Main outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), rate of surgical success, use of supplemental medical therapy, need for additional glaucoma surgery, and complications during suture removal. RESULTS: The BCVA and IOP were similar among the groups for all follow-up visits. As a determinant of success rate of trabeculectomy, mean decrease of IOP after surgery was over 30% in all groups (p = 0.43). The number of postoperative antiglaucomatous medications, number of complications, and need for an additional glaucoma surgery were similar in all groups (p = 0.40, p = 0.87, and p = 0.47, respectively). The differences in suture-related complications, defined as suture break or need for laser suture lysis, were not significant among the groups (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the 3 most common surgical techniques had similar mechanisms of action. All techniques were safe and effective, yielding similar outcomes. All 3 techniques can be used for closing scleral flaps in patients undergoing primary trabeculectomy.