Development of the complex trauma screener: A brief measure of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD.

The purpose of this study was to develop the Complex Trauma Screener (CTS), a brief screener (seven items) of the ICD-11 trauma disorders that can be used in "quick-paced" facilities. We examined the factor structure of the CTS in two separate samples: civilian college students (N = 823) and military veterans (N = 130) who reported exposure to at least one traumatic event. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) supported two highly-correlated factors (post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD] and Disturbances in Self-Organization [DSO]) that loaded on the ICD-11-consistent items. The model fit indices indicated good to excellent model fit in both samples, and the internal consistencies for the scales were borderline to good (α = 0.68-0.86). Supplementary analyses supported the gender invariance of the CFA model in the civilian student sample, as well as convergent (with another trauma inventory) and discriminant validity (with borderline disorder features, depression, and mania) of the CTS in both samples. The CTS is, to our knowledge, the shortest instrument designed to measure the ICD-11 trauma disorders and is ideal for "fast-paced" facilities that have significant assessment time restraints. The CTS is, therefore, is a psychometrically-validated instrument that can help mental health professionals efficiently screen adults for ICD-11 trauma disorders.

Increased knee joint loads during walking are present in subjects with knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: This study tests the hypothesis that the peak external knee adduction moment during gait is increased in a group of ambulatory subjects with knee osteoarthritis (OA) of varying radiographic severity who are being managed with medical therapy. Tibiofemoral knee OA more commonly affects the medial compartment. The external knee adduction moment can be used to assess the load distribution between the medial and lateral compartments of the knee joint. Additionally, this study tests if changes in the knee angles, such as a reduced midstance knee flexion angle, or reduced sagittal plane moments previously identified by others as load reducing mechanisms are present in this OA group. DESIGN: Thirty-one subjects with radiographic evidence of knee OA and medial compartment cartilage damage were gait tested after a 2-week drug washout period. Thirty-one normal subjects (asymptomatic control subjects) with a comparable age, weight and height distribution were also tested. Significant differences in the sagittal plane knee motion and peak external moments between the normal and knee OA groups were identified using t tests. RESULTS: Subjects with knee OA walked with a greater than normal peak external knee adduction moment (P=0.003). The midstance knee flexion angle was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.625) nor were the peak flexion and extension moments (P> 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Load reducing mechanisms, such as a decreased midstance knee flexion angle, identified by others in subjects with endstage knee OA or reduced external flexion or extension moments were not present in this group of subjects with knee OA who were being managed by conservative treatment. The finding of a significantly greater than normal external knee adduction moment in the knee OA group lends support to the hypothesis that an increased knee adduction moment during gait is associated with knee OA.

The knee adduction moment during gait in subjects with knee osteoarthritis is more closely correlated with static alignment than radiographic disease severity, toe out angle and pain.

This study tested whether the peak external knee adduction moments during walking in subjects with knee osteoarthritis (OA) were correlated with the mechanical axis of the leg, radiographic measures of OA severity, toe out angle or clinical assessments of pain, stiffness or function. Gait analysis was performed on 62 subjects with knee OA and 49 asymptomatic control subjects (normal subjects). The subjects with OA walked with a greater than normal peak adduction moment during early stance (p = 0.027). In the OA group, the mechanical axis was the best single predictor of the peak adduction moment during both early and late stance (R = 0.74, p < 0.001). The radiographic measures of OA severity in the medial compartment were also predictive of both peak adduction moments (R = 0.43 to 0.48, p < 0.001) along with the sum of the WOMAC subscales (R = -0.33 to -0.31, p < 0.017). The toe out angle was predictive of the peak adduction moment only during late stance (R = -0.45, p < 0.001). Once mechanical axis was accounted for, other factors only increased the ability to predict the peak knee adduction moments by 10 18%. While the mechanical axis was indicative of the peak adduction moments, it only accounted for about 50% of its variation, emphasizing the need for a dynamic evaluation of the knee joint loading environment. Understanding which clinical measures of OA are most closely associated with the dynamic knee joint loads may ultimately result in a better understanding of the disease process and the development of therapeutic interventions.

Knee pain and joint loading in subjects with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Although treatments for osteoarthritis of the knee are often directed at relieving pain, pain may cause patients to alter how they perform activities to decrease the loads on the joints. The knee-adduction moment is a major determinant of the load distribution between the medial and lateral plateaus. Therefore, the interrelationship between pain and the external knee-adduction moment during walking may be especially important for understanding mechanical factors related to the progression of medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. Fifty-three subjects with symptomatic radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis of the knee were studied. These subjects were a subset of those enrolled in a double-blind study in which gait analysis and radiographic and clinical evaluations were performed after a 2-week washout of anti-inflammatory and analgesic treatment. The subjects then took a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, acetaminophen, or placebo for 2 weeks, and the gait and clinical evaluations were repeated. The change in the peak external adduction moment between the two evaluations was inversely correlated with the change in pain (R = 0.48, p < 0.001) and was significantly different between those whose pain increased (n = 7), decreased (n = 18), or remained unchanged (n = 28) (p = 0.009). Those with increased pain had a significant decrease in the peak external adduction (p = 0.005) and flexion moments (p = 0.023). In contrast, the subjects with decreased pain tended to have an increase in the peak external adduction moment (p = 0.095) and had a significant increase in the peak external extension moment (p = 0.017). The subjects whose pain was unchanged had no significant change in the peak external adduction (p = 0.757), flexion (p = 0.234), or extension (p = 0.465) moments. Thus, decreases in pain among patients with medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis were related to increased loading of the degenerative portion of the joints. Additional long-term prospective studies are needed to determine whether increased loading during walking actually results in accelerated progression of the disease.