ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: If primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is performed promptly, the procedure is superior to fibrinolysis in restoring flow to the infarct-related artery in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The benchmark for a timely PCI intervention has become a door-to-balloon time of less than 90 minutes. Whether regional strategies can be developed to achieve this goal is uncertain. METHODS: We developed an integrated-metropolitan-area approach in which all patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were referred to a specialized center for primary PCI. We sought to determine whether there was a difference in door-to-balloon times between patients who were referred directly from the field by paramedics trained in the interpretation of electrocardiograms and patients who were referred by emergency department physicians. RESULTS: Between May 1, 2005, and April 30, 2006, a total of 344 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were referred for primary PCI: 135 directly from the field and 209 from emergency departments. Primary PCI was performed in 93.6% of patients. The median door-to-balloon time was shorter in patients referred from the field (69 minutes; interquartile range, 43 to 87) than in patients needing interhospital transfer (123 minutes; interquartile range, 101 to 153; P<0.001). Door-to-balloon times of less than 90 minutes were achieved in 79.7% of patients who were transferred from the field and in 11.9% of those transferred from emergency departments (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Guideline door-to-balloon-times were more often achieved when trained paramedics independently triaged and transported patients directly to a designated primary PCI center than when patients were referred from emergency departments.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/standards , Clinical Protocols/standards , Emergency Medical Services/standards , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Referral and Consultation , Aged , Cardiac Catheterization , Coronary Angiography , Electrocardiography , Emergency Medical Technicians , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Patient Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Referral and Consultation/standards , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Triage , Urban Health Services/standardsABSTRACT
Emergency medical services (EMSs) play a key role in the recognition and treatment of ST-elevation of myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to determine contemporary use of EMS in patients with STEMI and its relation to treatment, morbidity, and mortality patterns. Patients who arrived by EMS were compared with those who arrived by self-transport. Among 401 patients, 59.9% arrived by EMS and 40.1% by self-transport. Patients who arrived by EMS were older (p <0.001) and had higher Killip's scores (p <0.001). Door-to-needle and door-to-balloon intervals were shorter in patients who arrived by EMS (42 vs 57 minutes, p <0.001, and 124 vs 154 minutes, p <0.001, respectively). In-hospital mortality was higher in patients who used EMS (13.3% vs 5.0%, p <0.001). Patients who arrived by EMS also had higher mortality within the first hour of hospital arrival (4.2% vs 0%, p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis showed that only age and systolic blood pressure were predictors of mortality. Despite faster onset of reperfusion therapy in patients who arrived by EMS, mortality was higher. Almost 33% of these deaths occurred in the early in-hospital period, which was due to older and sicker patients having the tendency to come by EMS. Our results suggest that regional approaches are needed to trigger earlier reperfusion therapy in patients with STEMI who use EMS.
