A Case Series Study of Weekly or Fortnightly Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in Major Depressive Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is frequently chronic and relapsing. The use of maintenance or continuation transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has received clinical and some research support. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a case series study to report the outcomes of once-weekly (OW) or once-fortnightly (OF) continuation TMS in a real-life setting. METHODS: We offered OW or OF TMS sessions to patients with MDD in remission or partial remission/relapse. RESULTS: Ten patients received OW TMS and four received OF TMS, for 8 to 46 weeks. No patients in either group who were in remission or partial remission at baseline experienced a relapse. Improvements in HAMD6 and CGI-S scores were statistically significant or of borderline significance for the total sample and the OW group. CONCLUSIONS: This naturalistic, open-label observational study indicates that OW TMS is effective as maintenance therapy in MDD, while also offering some support for OF TMS maintenance in preventing relapse.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) for Major Depressive Disorder-Modus Operandi!

Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is effective in the management of treatment resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) and has recently become widely available. Our aim was to explore the literature for evidence of the mechanism of action. Method: We examined our own accumulating TMS library, the reference lists of all available papers and used a search engine to collect information. We collated and examined this information under relevant heading. Results: TMS produces a large number of physiological changes including site of stimulation neurochemical, brain wave and blood flow effects, and distant structure effects including neurotransmitter effects and volume increase. TMS also corrects generalized and local functional connectivity (FC) abnormalities which are a feature of MDD. Conclusion: TMS produces a range of physiological changes. It is unclear which of these underpin its antidepressant. It is likely more than one work synergistically to this end-almost certainly the capacity to correct MDD induced FC abnormalities makes a strong antidepressant contribution.

One Hundred Courses of Cluster Maintenance Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (CM TMS)-A Clinical Audit Study.

Objective: Major depressive disorder (MDD) which comes to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is prone to relapse. Cluster maintenance (CM) TMS is courses of 5 treatments delivered over 2.5-5 days, separated by monthly or greater non-treatment periods. Our aim was to characterize the outcomes of 100 courses of CM TMS. Method: This was a Quality Assurance/Clinical Audit study. We studied consecutive CM TMS courses provided to private hospital inpatients. Mood was rated (on admission and discharge) using the six-item Hamilton depression rating (HAMD6) and the Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) scales. We also applied recent STAR*D criteria which are designed to measure the 'clinical change' expected to impact patient function [16]. Results: For the total sample, using the HAMD6, 83% of courses featured relapse or partial relapse on admission, and 81% featured remission on discharge. Of 46 courses featuring HAMD6 relapse on admission, 74% featured remission on discharge. For the 100 courses the HAMD6 discharge scores were significantly lower than the admission scores (p = 2.0 × 10-24), as were the CGI-S scores (p = 1.8 × 10-25). Using STAR*D criteria for people in relapse or partial relapse on admission, CM TMS provided least a 'clinically meaningful' outcome in 82% of the cases. Conclusion: For courses featuring relapse or partial relapse on admission, CM TMS converted greater than 70% to remission at discharge. It produced statistically significant reductions in HAMD6 and CGI-S scores, and using STAR*D criteria, at least 'clinically meaningful' change was extensively demonstrated. This evidence indicates CM TMS should be readily available to people living with relapsing MDD.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) during pregnancy: a fetal risk factor.

OBJECTIVE: To examine reports of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) during pregnancy for evidence of fetal risk. METHOD: PubMed was used to locate relevant literature for the years 1998-2020 and reference lists were examined for materials not located electronically. RESULTS: Ten reports were located dealing with 67 births over 20 years. Stimulation was applied is all trimesters, at low and high frequency, and as intermittent theta-burst stimulation. No mother or baby experienced a serious event. CONCLUSIONS: Certainty awaits large, standardized studies. However, the available reports provide no evidence that TMS to mother during pregnancy has detrimental effects on the fetus.

The impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on irritability occurring with acute major depressive disorder (MDD).

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact (if any) of a course of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on irritability occurring in association with acute major depressive disorder (MDD). METHOD: In a naturalistic study, patients with MDD according to DSM-5 criteria were given 20 daily TMS treatments. A visual analogue scale for irritability (VAS-I) was developed. Objective tools included the six-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMDS6) and the Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S). RESULTS: Fifty patients received 53 courses. Forty-seven courses achieved remission on both HAMD6 and CGI-S and six courses did not achieve remission with either. Irritability significantly reduced when MDD remission was achieved but was unchanged when remission was not achieved. CONCLUSION: TMS reduces irritability occurring in association with MDD when this treatment affects MDD remission, but not when remission is not affected.

Early relapse (ER) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in treatment resistant major depression.

BACKGROUND: There is interest in using TMS to keep patients with severe relapsing depression as well as possible, once remission has been achieved. This has been conceptualized as 'maintaining' the remission. One protocol employs series of 5 TMS sessions over 3 or 5 days, at about monthly intervals. We have suggested this practice is better conceptualized as early relapse (ER) TMS. AIM: To determine whether 5 TMS sessions at about monthly intervals are effective in keeping patients relatively well, and whether the concept of ER-TMS can be supported. METHOD: Prospective, naturalistic, 10-month study, administering pre- and post-TMS series, HAMD6, visual analogue scale for mood, and CGI-S. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (72% female) received 168 series of 5 TMS sessions and remained in the program for 21 weeks on average. Pre-post-treatment scores showed significant reductions on all measures. Post-series HAMD6 score 3.30 (2.28) indicates remission has been achieved. Pre-series scores of 6.24 (2.78) indicate a post-series decline in mood, in the direction of relapse. Before TMS series 70% were no longer in remission (being in partial remission or relapse), and after TMS series, 79% were in remission. CONCLUSION: In severe relapsing depression, monthly series of TMS move mood from the relapse/partial remission range in the direction or remission and is appropriately termed early relapse ER-TMS. Long-term availability of ER-TMS to patients with severe relapsing depression deserves consideration.

Cortical excitability of psychiatric disorders: reduced post-exercise facilitation in depression compared to schizophrenia and controls.

OBJECTIVE: In normal subjects, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) from the motor cortex are increased after non-fatiguing exercise of hand muscles. This phenomenon is called post-exercise facilitation. This study aims to test the hypothesis that psychiatric syndromes (major depressive episode, schizophrenia) have different levels of post-exercise facilitation compared to controls. METHODS: Patients with DSM-IV major depressive episode (six female, four male), schizophrenia (two female, nine male) and a control group (nine female, four male) participated. MEPs were elicited pre- and post-exercise from the contralateral abductor pollicis brevis by TMS over the primary motor cortex. RESULTS: Post-exercise facilitation expressed as a percentage of baseline was 510% in controls, 110% in depression and 190% in schizophrenia. There were significant differences in patients with depression and schizophrenia compared to controls (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Post-exercise facilitation was reduced in depression and schizophrenia, suggesting impaired cortical excitability in these disorders. Further studies may discriminate between the two groups.