Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
J Hand Surg Am ; 48(2): 165-176, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36333243

ABSTRACT

Hand and upper extremity (HUE) vascular disorders are encountered frequently by hand surgeons in clinical practice. A wide array of imaging and vascular interventional radiology modalities exists for the diagnosis and treatment of HUE vascular disorders, some of which may not be familiar to the HUE surgeons. In this review article, we summarize the vascular imaging and vascular interventional radiology modalities and their relative advantages, disadvantages, and indications with respect to HUE pathology. We aim to familiarize HUE surgeons with the available types of diagnostic and therapeutic options for HUE vascular pathologies and aid interdisciplinary communication with vascular interventional radiology specialists during the clinical decision-making process.


Subject(s)
Surgeons , Vascular Diseases , Humans , Radiology, Interventional , Upper Extremity/diagnostic imaging , Hand/diagnostic imaging
2.
Int Orthop ; 45(7): 1767-1774, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34027565

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The rotator cuff (RC) muscles contribute to dynamic stability and rotational actions of the glenohumeral joint. Moment arm can be used to demonstrate the potential work a muscle contributes to a musculoskeletal joint rotation. This study aimed to understand the moment arm contributions of the RC muscles and explore changes following a complete supraspinatus tear treated with either superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). METHODS: Five fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were prepared and mounted in an apparatus where each intact RC muscle was held in tension with a line of action toward its origin on the scapula. Mean moment arms for each muscle were determined experimentally based on Optotrak data collected during cadaveric shoulder arm abduction. RESULTS: Using ANOVA testing, our analysis demonstrated significant differences (p < 0.001) in infraspinatus and teres minor moment arms after rTSA compared to the intact shoulder model. After SCR, significant differences (p < 0.001) were seen in teres minor, with these differences being statistically similar to the changes seen in teres minor after rTSA. Subscapularis showed no significant difference in moment arm values between the models (p = 0.148). CONCLUSION: Our results illustrate that mean moment arms were preserved in the RC muscles after complete supraspinatus tear. This study also shows evidence that subscapularis function may be maintained after SCR or rTSA. After SCR, infraspinatus may maintain similar abduction ability compared to the anatomical shoulder, while teres minor ability may increase. Infraspinatus may have decreased abduction ability after rTSA while teres minor may have increased ability.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder , Rotator Cuff Injuries , Shoulder Joint , Arm , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Range of Motion, Articular , Rotator Cuff/surgery , Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery , Shoulder Joint/surgery
4.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 8(12): 2325967120964476, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33330732

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Degenerative and traumatic changes to the rotator cuff can result in massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs). PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The study objective was to conduct a biomechanical comparison between a small, incomplete RCT and a large, complete RCT. We hypothesized that the incomplete supraspinatus (SS) tear would lead to an incremental loss of abduction force and preserve vertical position of the humeral head, while a complete SS tear would cause superior humeral migration, decrease functional deltoid abduction force, and increase passive range of motion (ROM). STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Six cadaveric shoulders were evaluated using a custom testing apparatus. Each shoulder was subjected to 3 conditions: (1) intact/control, (2) 50%, full-thickness, incomplete SS tear, and (3) 100%, complete SS tear. Deltoid abduction force, superior humeral head migration, and passive ROM were measured in static conditions at 0°, 30°, and 60° of glenohumeral abduction, respectively. RESULTS: The intact SS resulted in a mean deltoid abduction force of 2.5, 3.3, and 3.8 N at 0°, 30°, and 60° of abduction, respectively. Compared with the intact shoulder, there was no significant difference in mean abduction force seen in the incomplete tear, while the force was significantly decreased by 52% at 30° of abduction in the complete tear (P = .009). Compared with the incomplete tear, there were significant decreases in abduction force seen in the complete tear, by 33% and 48% (0.9 N and 1.1 N) at 0° and 30° of abduction, respectively (P = .04 and .004). The intact configuration experienced a mean superior humeral head migration of 1.5, 1.4, and 1.1 mm at 0°, 30°, and 60° of abduction, respectively. The complete tear resulted in a superior migration of 3.0 and 4.4 mm greater than the intact configuration at 0° and 30° of abduction, respectively (P = .001). There was a 5° and 10° increase in abduction ROM with 50% and 100% tears, respectively (P = .003 and .03). CONCLUSION: An incomplete SS tear does not significantly alter the biomechanics of the shoulder, while a large, complete SS tear leads to a significant superior humeral migration, a decreased deltoid abduction force, and a mild increase in passive ROM. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings demonstrate the effects of large SS tears on key biomechanical parameters, as they progress from partial tears.

5.
Hand Clin ; 36(4): 539-547, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33040966

ABSTRACT

An unstable, arthritic elbow presents a therapeutic challenge. Patients may have painful, limited range of motion, often due to trauma or progressive joint destruction from rheumatologic disease. The options for management may be particularly challenging when treating young, active patients. While elbow arthroplasty usually provides predictable pain relief and joint range of motion, concerns exist regarding postoperative activity limitations and implant survival. Therefore, these procedures are limited to select subsets of patients, typically low-demand, elderly patients. Interposition arthroplasty is an option for the young, active patient with a painful arthritic elbow.


Subject(s)
Arthritis/surgery , Arthroplasty/methods , Elbow Joint/surgery , Joint Instability/surgery , Arthritis/physiopathology , Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Chronic Pain/surgery , Elbow Joint/physiopathology , Humans , Joint Instability/physiopathology , Postoperative Care
6.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 29(10): 1959-1966, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32669201

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has been gaining popularity as a treatment for irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs), especially in younger patients. This biomechanical study aimed to investigate how SCR affects functional abduction force, humeral head migration, and passive range of motion following an irreparable RCT. We hypothesized that SCR will restore these parameters to nearly intact shoulder levels. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were evaluated using a custom biomechanical testing apparatus. Each shoulder was taken through 3 conditions: (1) intact (control); (2) irreparable, complete supraspinatus (SS) tear; and (3) SCR. Functional abduction force, superior humeral head migration, and passive range of motion, including axial shoulder rotation, were measured in static condition at 0°, 30°, and 60° of glenohumeral abduction. Data were analyzed using the paired Student t test or Wilcoxon signed rank test, depending on the results of normality testing. RESULTS: The irreparable SS tear resulted in significantly lower functional abduction force at 30° of abduction (P = .01) and a trend toward a decrease (P = .17) at 60° compared with the intact configuration. SCR shoulders produced greater functional force at 0° compared with the tear configuration (P = .046). Humeral head migration was significantly increased by 4.4 and 3.0 mm at 0° and 30° of abduction, respectively, when comparing the intact vs. SS tear configurations (P = .001). SCR decreased superior migration down to levels of intact shoulders at 0° and 30° of abduction (P = .008 and P = .013, respectively) and was not significantly different from the intact configuration at any angle. SCR decreased passive shoulder extension compared with the tear configuration and increased abduction compared with the intact configuration (P = .007 and P = .03, respectively). The overall arc of axial rotation was not significantly different between SCR and the intact configuration at any angle. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of an irreparable SS tear, SCR restores key biomechanical parameters of the shoulder to intact levels. SCR should be considered for qualifying patients with irreparable RCTs.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty/methods , Humeral Head/physiopathology , Joint Capsule/surgery , Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery , Shoulder Joint/physiopathology , Aged , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cadaver , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Movement , Range of Motion, Articular
7.
Int Orthop ; 44(11): 2371-2377, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32638068

ABSTRACT

AIM OF THE STUDY: Our objective was to compare biomechanical effects of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) on shoulder motion, in the setting of an irreparable supraspinatus (SS) tear. We hypothesized that rTSA would produce greater improvement in abduction force and shift the humerus inferiorly, while SCR would produce greater range of motion (ROM) and prevent superior migration of the humerus during abduction. METHODS: Six cadaveric shoulders were evaluated using a custom biomechanical apparatus. Each shoulder underwent four experimental conditions: (1) intact/control, (2) irreparable SS tear, (3) SCR using dermal allograft, and (4) rTSA without SCR. Deltoid abduction force, superior humeral head translation, and passive range of motion were measured in static tendon loading condition at 0, 30, and 60° of glenohumeral abduction. RESULTS: Both rTSA and SCR restored abduction force to intact levels at all abduction angles. rTSA significantly increased abduction force compared with the SS-deficient shoulder at 0, 30, 60° (p = 0.04), while SCR produced a significant increase at 0° (p = 0.05) abduction. rTSA inferiorly shifted the humeral head by 27 mm (p = 0.002). SCR restored superior humeral head translation to intact SS levels. Compared with SCR, rTSA resulted in 25° less passive abduction (p = 0.001) without significant differences in forward flexion/extension. Compared with SCR, rTSA achieved 10° less passive internal rotation at 0° abduction (p = 0.03) and 26° and 17° greater external rotation at 30° and 60° abduction, respectively (p = 0.03, p = 0.04). DISCUSSION: Our investigation found that abduction force was restored to intact cuff levels by both procedures, without significant differences between the two techniques. SCR restored superior humeral head migration and rTSA translated the humerus inferiorly. rTSA resulted in decreased passive abduction ROM and increased external rotation, compared with SCR. CONCLUSION: Both SCR and rTSA restore key biomechanical parameters following an irreparable SS tear, although SCR offers superior passive abduction ROM.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder , Rotator Cuff Injuries , Shoulder Joint , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cadaver , Humans , Range of Motion, Articular , Rotator Cuff/surgery , Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery , Shoulder , Shoulder Joint/surgery
8.
Hip Int ; 29(4): 346-354, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31006272

ABSTRACT

Hip preservation is one of the fastest growing fields in orthopaedics and indications of intra-articular procedures are well established. In the last decade, extra-articular procedures have gained momentum and arthroscopic solutions to peri-articular hip pathologies have been offered. It should be noted that many of these pathologies are well-treated conservatively and only those who fail conservative management should be treated operatively. These indications can be divided into 5 categories: greater trochanteric pain syndrome; internal hip snapping; anterior inferior iliac spine/sub-spine impingement; sciatic nerve entrapment; and proximal hamstring injuries. This article reviews the anatomy, patient history and physical examination, imaging, non-operative treatment, endoscopic operative treatment and outcomes of each category. While indications for hip arthroscopy, specifically extra-articular procedures, are rising steadily, there is not enough data to support its superiority over open procedures. Current literature consists of case studies, case reports, and expert opinions and lacks large, randomised control studies.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Hip Joint , Joint Diseases , Arthroscopy/methods , Femur , Hip Joint/surgery , Humans , Ilium , Joint Diseases/surgery , Orthopedics
9.
Arthroscopy ; 35(2): 480-488, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30612775

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report clinical outcomes of arthroscopic labral reconstruction in the hip at minimum 2-year follow-up in comparison to a pair-matched labral repair group. METHODS: Patients were included in this study if they underwent labral reconstruction during hip arthroscopy and had minimum 2-year follow-up data available. Exclusion criteria were active workers' compensation claims or previous ipsilateral hip surgery or conditions. Reconstruction patients were matched 1:2 to patients that underwent arthroscopic labral repair but otherwise met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Matching criteria were age within 5 years, sex, body mass index within 5, same capsular treatment, and whether there was chondral damage of Outerbridge grade II or greater. Three patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were recorded preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. International Hip Outcome Tool and patient satisfaction were also collected at latest follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-four reconstruction patients were matched to 68 repair patients. There were no significant differences in age (P = .941), sex (P > .999), body mass index (P = .935), or any other demographics between groups. A statistically significant increase was seen in PROs for both the reconstruction group (Modified Harris Hip Score, P = .002; Hip Outcome Score - Sports Subscale, P<.001; Non-arthritic Hip Score, P<.001) and the repair group (Modified Harris Hip Score, P<.001; Hip Outcome Score - Sports Subscale, P < .001; Non-arthritic Hip Score, P<.001) at minimum 2-year follow-up. Significant decrease was shown for VAS for both groups (reconstruction VAS, P<.001; repair, P<.001) at minimum 2-year follow-up. There were no significant differences in rates of postoperative complications (P>.999), secondary arthroscopy (P>.999), or conversion to total hip arthroplasty (P = .728) between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic labral reconstruction is associated with significant improvement in PROs and a low incidence of secondary surgery within 2-year follow-up. Improvements in PROs, VAS, patient satisfaction, and incidence of secondary procedures were comparable to a match control treated with labral repair. Although there were no differences shown in the 2 groups with respect to complication rate, secondary arthroscopy, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty, the study was not powered to compare these outcome parameters. Based on this evidence, either labral repair or reconstruction may be selected depending upon the clinical scenario. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; retrospective comparative study.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy/methods , Fibrocartilage/surgery , Hip Joint/surgery , Acetabulum/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/statistics & numerical data , Arthroscopy/adverse effects , Body Mass Index , Cartilage, Articular/surgery , Female , Fibrocartilage/injuries , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Tendons/transplantation , Treatment Outcome , Visual Analog Scale , Young Adult
10.
Am J Sports Med ; 46(14): 3437-3445, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30419171

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Revision hip arthroscopy is increasingly common and often addresses acetabular labrum pathology. There is a lack of consensus on indications or outcomes of revision labral repair versus reconstruction. PURPOSE: To report clinical outcomes of labral reconstruction during revision hip arthroscopy at minimum 2-year follow-up as compared with pair-matched labral repair during revision hip arthroscopy (control group) and to suggest a decision-making algorithm for labral treatment in revision hip arthroscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients who underwent revision hip arthroscopy with labral reconstruction were matched 1:2 with patients who underwent revision arthroscopic labral repair. Patients were matched according to age, sex, and body mass index. Outcome scores, including the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale, and a visual analog scale for pain, were collected preoperatively and at minimum 2-year follow-up. At latest follow-up, patient satisfaction on a 0-10 scale and the abbreviated International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) were collected. Complications, subsequent arthroscopies, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty were collected as well. RESULTS: A total of 15 revision labral reconstructions were pair matched to 30 revision labral repairs. The reconstructions had fewer isolated Seldes type I detachments ( P = .008) and lower postoperative lateral center-edge angle, but there were otherwise no significant differences in demographics, radiographics, intraoperative findings, or procedures. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in all outcomes and visual analog scale at minimum 2-year follow-up. The revision repairs trended toward better preoperative scores: mHHS (mean ± SD: 59.3 ± 16.5 vs 54.2 ± 16.0), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (61.0 ± 16.7 vs 51.2 ± 17.6), Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale (39.6 ± 25.1 vs 30.5 ± 22.1), and visual analog scale (5.8 ± 1.8 vs 6.2 ± 2.2). At follow-up, the revision repair group had significantly higher mHHS (84.1 ± 14.8 vs 72.0 ± 18.3, P = .043) and iHOT-12 (72.2 ± 23.3 vs 49.0 ± 27.6, P = .023) scores than the reconstruction group. The magnitudes of pre- to postoperative improvement between the groups were comparable. The groups also had comparable rates of complications: 1 case of numbness in each group ( P > .999), subsequent arthroscopies (repair: n = 2, 6.5%; revision: n = 3, 20%; P = .150), and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (1 patient in each group, P > .999). CONCLUSION: Labral reconstruction safely and effectively treats irreparable labra in revision hip arthroscopy. However, labral repair is another treatment option for reparable labra, yielding similar magnitude of improvement. A proposed algorithm may assist in surgical decision making to achieve optimal outcomes based on the condition and history of each patient's acetabular labrum.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy/methods , Cartilage, Articular/surgery , Hip Joint/surgery , Adult , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroscopy/adverse effects , Body Mass Index , Female , Humans , Male , Matched-Pair Analysis , Pain/etiology , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Visual Analog Scale , Young Adult
11.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 57(6): 1092-1095, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30030038

ABSTRACT

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an evolving option for treating ankle arthritis. We assessed the national trends in usage and perioperative outcomes of TAA in the United States. International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9), codes were used to search the National Hospital Discharge Survey database for TAA from 1997 to 2010. Patient demographics, comorbidities, hospitalization length, discharge disposition, blood transfusion, lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and mortality data were gathered. Trends were evaluated using linear regression with Pearson's correlation coefficient, and statistical comparisons were performed using Student's t test and z-test for proportions with significance at p = .05. We identified 120 patients with TAA. TAA demonstrated a positive correlation with time (r = 0.57), significantly increasing from 2.4 cases per 100,000 admissions from 1997 to 2003 to 3.5 cases per 100,000 from 2004 to 2010 (p = .04). The mean age was 57.8 (range 19 to 83) years. The mean number of comorbidities was 4.5 (range 1 to ≥7). Although patient age remained stable (p = .21), the mean number of comorbidities significantly increased from 4.0 from 1997 to 2003 to 4.8 from 2004 to 2010 (p = .02); 8 patients (6.7%) had diabetes, 71 (59.2%) had primary osteoarthritis, and 35 (29.2%) had posttraumatic arthropathy. The mean length of stay significantly decreased from 3.1 to 2.3 days (p = .03). Three patients (2.5%) required a blood transfusion. No deep vein thrombosis or PE was diagnosed. No patients died during the operative admission; 95 patients (87%) were discharged home and 14 (13%) required a skilled rehabilitation facility. Discharge patterns showed no significant change with time (p = .59). Usage of TAA in the United States has increased nearly 50% over the past 14 years. TAA was associated with shorter hospitalization, infrequent rehabilitation facility requirements, and few perioperative complications.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle/statistics & numerical data , Joint Diseases/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Databases, Factual , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Joint Diseases/diagnosis , Joint Diseases/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , United States , Young Adult
12.
Hip Int ; 28(6): 649-656, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29865889

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity in the literature regarding mid-term results of microfracture in hip arthroscopy. We aim to assess 5-year outcomes of patients who underwent acetabular microfracture for full-thickness chondral lesions as a part of hip arthroscopy. METHODS: Between August 2008 and September 2011, data were prospectively gathered for patients undergoing acetabular microfracture during hip arthroscopy with minimum 5-year follow-up. All patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively, with modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score - Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and visual analog scale (VAS). International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) and satisfaction were collected postoperatively. Exclusion criteria included previous hip conditions, or preoperative Tönnis grade ≥2. RESULTS: Fifty three hips were eligible for this study. Of these, 43 (81.1%) hips in 42 patients had follow-up. The study group had a male majority (65.1%) and an average age of 44.4 ± 9.5 years. There was statistically significant improvement in all patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and VAS at follow-up. Patient satisfaction was 7.6 ± 2.6. A comparison of 2-year to minimum 5-year follow-up results identified no statistically significant deterioration in PROs, VAS, and patient satisfaction. Survivorship was 72.1% with 12 patients converted to total hip arthroplasty (THA). 4 patients (10.8%) underwent secondary arthroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: In the mid-term, microfracture as a part of hip arthroscopy demonstrated favourable outcomes and 72% survivorship. Careful patient selection is warranted to limit the risk of conversion to THA.


Subject(s)
Acetabulum/surgery , Arthroscopy , Cartilage Diseases/surgery , Fractures, Stress/etiology , Hip Joint/surgery , Acetabulum/injuries , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fractures, Stress/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Patient Satisfaction , Treatment Outcome , Visual Analog Scale
13.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 100(11): 965-973, 2018 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29870448

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a negative prognostic factor for various surgical procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare patients with obesity who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears with a match-controlled group of normal-weight patients. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent arthroscopy between February 2008 and December 2011. Inclusion criteria were treatment for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears and completed preoperative patient-reported outcomes and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Exclusion criteria were previous ipsilateral hip conditions or preoperative Tönnis grade of ≥2. Patients with obesity (body mass index [BMI] of ≥30 kg/m) were matched and were compared with normal-weight patients (BMI of 18.5 to 24.99 kg/m) using a 1:1 ratio by age at the time of the surgical procedure within 5 years, sex, acetabular Outerbridge grade (0 or 1 compared with 2, 3, or 4), and capsular treatment. RESULTS: Of the 96 obesity cases with follow-up, 74 were pair-matched to control cases. The mean BMI was 34.3 kg/m for the obesity group and 22.7 kg/m for the control group (p < 0.0001). The mean follow-up time was 71.6 months for the obesity group and 71.3 months for the control group (p = 0.41). All mean preoperative patient-reported outcomes and VAS scores for patients without conversion to total hip arthroplasty were significantly worse in the obesity group: modified Harris hip score (p = 0.0001), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (p = 0.0001), Hip Outcome Score Sports-Specific Scale (HOS-SSS) (p = 0.015), and VAS (p = 0.01). No significant differences were observed with regard to demographic characteristics, intraoperative findings, procedures, follow-up scores, magnitudes of improvement, or secondary arthroscopy rates (p > 0.05). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in mean outcome scores at ≥5 years (p < 0.0001). In both groups, no significant differences were detected in mean outcome scores between 2 years and ≥5 years (p > 0.05). The conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty was 29.7% for the obesity group and 14.9% for the control group (relative risk, 2.0 [95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 3.8]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears in patients with obesity yielded significant improvements at ≥5 years; these results were similar to a matched group of normal-weight patients. However, patients with obesity demonstrated a twofold increased risk of conversion to total hip arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Femoracetabular Impingement/surgery , Hip Joint/surgery , Obesity/complications , Acetabulum/surgery , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Female , Femoracetabular Impingement/complications , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Patient Satisfaction , Reoperation , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
14.
Am J Sports Med ; 45(10): 2294-2302, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28609644

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies on midterm outcomes of the arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tears with mild osteoarthritis (OA) are limited. PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of the arthroscopic treatment of FAI and labral tears in patients with mild preoperative OA (Tönnis grade 1) at a minimum 5-year follow-up, and to perform a matched-pair comparison to a control group with Tönnis grade 0. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery between February 2008 and April 2011. Inclusion criteria were arthroscopic treatment for FAI and labral tears and having preoperative patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, including the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and Hip Outcome Score-Sports-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain. Exclusion criteria were workers' compensation claims, preoperative Tönnis grade ≥2, and previous hip conditions (ipsilateral surgery, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, avascular necrosis, and dysplasia). Patients with minimum 5-year outcomes were eligible for matching on a 1:1 ratio (Tönnis grade 0 vs 1) based on age ±5 years, body mass index ±5 kg/m2, sex, labral treatment, and capsular treatment. RESULTS: Of 356 eligible hips, 292 hips had minimum 5-year outcomes (82%). Eighty-five hips with Tönnis grade 1 were evaluated. At 5-year follow-up, patients with Tönnis grade 1 had significant improvements in all PRO and VAS scores ( P < .0001). The overall satisfaction score was 8.2. The survivorship rate with respect to conversion to total hip arthroplasty for the Tönnis grade 1 group was 69.4% at 5 years, while in the Tönnis grade 0 group, it was 88.4% ( P = .0002). Sixty-two hips with Tönnis grade 0 were matched to 62 hips with Tönnis grade 1. Both groups demonstrated improvements in all PRO and VAS scores from preoperatively to postoperatively ( P < .0001). No significant differences existed between preoperative or postoperative scores or survivorship between the groups. CONCLUSION: The arthroscopic treatment of FAI and labral tears in patients with Tönnis grade 1 had good results at 5-year follow-up. After controlling for other variables using a matched-pair comparison, patients with Tönnis grade 1 had similar, durable improvements to those with Tönnis grade 0. While strict surgical indications and appropriate expectations are recommended for patients with mild OA, Tönnis grade 1 alone should not be considered a contraindication to hip arthroscopic surgery.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis/surgery , Activities of Daily Living , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Arthroscopy/methods , Female , Femoracetabular Impingement/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Matched-Pair Analysis , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
15.
Arthrosc Tech ; 3(4): e459-63, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25276604

ABSTRACT

Chondral injuries of the hip joint are often symptomatic and affect patient activity level. Several procedures are available for addressing chondral injuries, including microfracture. Microfracture is a marrow-stimulating procedure, which creates subchondral perforation in the bone, allowing pluripotent mesenchymal stem cells to migrate from the marrow into the chondral defect and form fibrocartilaginous tissue. In the knee, microfracture has been shown to relieve pain symptoms. In the hip, microfracture has been studied to a lesser extent, but published studies have shown promising clinical outcomes. The depth, joint congruity, and geometry of the hip joint make microfracture technically challenging. The most common technique uses hip-specific microfracture awls, but the trajectory of impaction is not perpendicular to the subchondral plate. Consequently, the parallel direction of impaction creates poorly defined channels. We describe an arthroscopic microfracture technique for the hip using a flexible microfracture drill. The drill and angled guides simplify access to the chondral defect. The microfracture drill creates clear osseous channels, avoiding compaction of the surrounding bone and obstruction of the channels. Furthermore, this technique allows for better control of the angle and depth of the drill holes, which enhances reproducibility and may yield improved clinical outcomes.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...