Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Zoonoses Public Health ; 57(7-8): 463-75, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19912607

ABSTRACT

In this study, we investigated how the likelihoods of Salmonella presence in various samples from broilers and their grow-out environment throughout one production cycle were related. Sixty-four broiler flocks from 10 complexes of two companies in the southern United States were included in the study. Samples from the gastrointestinal tracts of chicks, transport tray pads and litter and drag swabs from the house were collected on the day of placement of each flock. Approximately, 1 week before harvest, whole bird carcass rinses, caecum and crop samples were collected from birds from these same flocks. On the day of harvest, litter and drag swab samples were also taken from the house after the birds were removed. Upon arrival of the flocks at the processing plant, whole carcass rinses, caecum and crop samples were collected. As the flocks were processed, carcass rinses were collected just before the carcasses entered the immersion chill tank and as they exited the chill tank. Logistic regression was used to model the relationships between the likelihood of Salmonella in samples of each type collected at each sampling point and Salmonella frequencies in all the samples taken from the flock and grow-out environment at preceding production stages. The analysis demonstrated that increased likelihood of Salmonella contaminated carcasses entering the immersion chill tank was associated with higher contamination of the exteriors and crops of birds at arrival for processing as well as house environmental samples at the time of harvest and prior to placement. The best predictors of post-chill broiler carcass Salmonella status were the frequencies of Salmonella in the litter on the day of harvest and prior to placement. The immersion chilling appeared to disrupt some of the relationships between the processing plant and pre-harvest samples.


Subject(s)
Chickens/microbiology , Food-Processing Industry , Housing, Animal , Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Poultry Products/microbiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Animals , Cecum/microbiology , Environment , United States
2.
Poult Sci ; 84(7): 992-7, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16050114

ABSTRACT

Since the implementation of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP), the need for on-farm food safety risk assessment and management has greatly increased. In order to provide accurate risk assessments, attention should be focused on better characterization of the Salmonella isolation and identification techniques. In this work, we compared the isolation ability of 4 Salmonella-specific protocols: immunomagnetic separation (DB), tetrathionate (TT) broth, Rappaport-Vassiliadis R10 (RV) broth, and a secondary enrichment (TR) procedure as well as 2 selective solid media (brilliant green agar, BG; and xylose-lysine tergitol 4, XLT4). All 4 methods were compared in litter and drag swab samples that were collected weekly during the broiler grow out period in 7 houses. There were 65/126 (51.6%) pooled litter samples positive and 115/304 (37.8%) drag swab samples positive for Salmonella by at least one method. Of the 65 positive litter samples, DB, RV, and TT isolated 1 (2.7%), 31 (47.7%), and 23 (35.4%) of the samples as positive when using BG agar, respectively. The TR protocol identified 83.1% (54/65) of the positive samples as positive when using BG agar. In the drag swab samples, DB did not identify any samples as positive, whereas TT and RV found 28 (25.7%) and 26 (23.9%) of the 109 samples to be positive when using BG agar, respectively. Again, the TR protocol identified the highest percentage of positive samples (94.5%). An analysis of agreement, kappa, revealed that TT and RV did not always agree on which samples were positive, although the number of samples identified as positive by both were not different. A comparison between the 2 agar plates used, BG and XLT4, showed that they had high agreement when the secondary enrichment protocol was used, but agreement was only moderate to low when the other 3 methods were used.


Subject(s)
Chickens , Housing, Animal , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Animals , Bacteriological Techniques , Salmonella/growth & development
3.
Poult Sci ; 83(7): 1112-6, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15285501

ABSTRACT

The poultry industry is now operating under increased regulatory pressure following the introduction of the pathogen reduction and hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP) rule in 1996. This new operation scheme has greatly increased the need for on-farm food safety risk management of foodborne bacteria, such as Salmonella. Information needed to make informed food safety risk management decisions must be obtained from accurate risk assessments, which rely on the sensitivity of the isolation techniques used to identify Salmonella in the production environment. Therefore, better characterization of the Salmonella isolation and identification techniques is warranted. One new technique, immunomagnetic separation (IMS), may offer a benefit to the poultry industry, as it has been shown to be efficacious in the isolation of Salmonella from various sample matrices, including some poultry products. In this work, we compared the isolation ability of 4 Salmonella-specific protocols: IMS, tetrathionate (TT) broth, Rappaport-Vassiliadis R10 (RV) broth, and a secondary enrichment (TR) procedure. All 4 methods were compared in 4 different spiked sample matrices: Butterfield's, poultry litter, broiler crops, and carcass rinses. IMS was able to detect Salmonella at 3.66, 2.09, 3.06, and 3.97 log10 cfu/mL in Butterfield's, poultry litter, carcass rinse, and broiler crop matrices, respectively. For the broiler litter and Butterfield's solution, there were no (P > 0.05) differences among the 4 isolation protocols. However, in the carcass rinse and crop samples, there were no differences among the isolation of Salmonella using RV, TR, or TT, but all 3 were (P < or = 0.05) more successful at recovering Salmonella than the IMS method.


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Chickens/microbiology , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Animals , Crop, Avian/microbiology , Culture Media , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Food Microbiology , Immunomagnetic Separation , Meat/microbiology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tetrathionic Acid
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...